OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to broadly review the scientific literature and summarize the most up-to-date findings on ovarian cancer health disparities worldwide and in the United States (U.S.). METHODS: The present literature on disparities in ovarian cancer was reviewed. Original research and relevant review articles were included. RESULTS: Ovarian cancer health disparities exist worldwide and in the U.S. Ovarian cancer disproportionately affect African American women at all stages of the disease, from presentation through treatment, and ultimately increased mortality and decreased survival, compared to non-Hispanic White women. Increased mortality is likely to be explained by unequal access to care and non-standard treatment regimens frequently administered to African American women, but may also be attributed to genetic susceptibility, acquired co-morbid conditions and increased frequency of modifiable risk factors, albeit to substantially lesser extent. Unequal access to care is, in turn, largely a consequence of lower socioeconomic status and lack of private health insurance coverage among the African American population. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the need for policy changes aimed at facilitating equal access to quality medical care. At the same time, further research is necessary to fully resolve racial disparities in ovarian cancer.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to broadly review the scientific literature and summarize the most up-to-date findings on ovarian cancer health disparities worldwide and in the United States (U.S.). METHODS: The present literature on disparities in ovarian cancer was reviewed. Original research and relevant review articles were included. RESULTS:Ovarian cancer health disparities exist worldwide and in the U.S. Ovarian cancer disproportionately affect African American women at all stages of the disease, from presentation through treatment, and ultimately increased mortality and decreased survival, compared to non-Hispanic White women. Increased mortality is likely to be explained by unequal access to care and non-standard treatment regimens frequently administered to African American women, but may also be attributed to genetic susceptibility, acquired co-morbid conditions and increased frequency of modifiable risk factors, albeit to substantially lesser extent. Unequal access to care is, in turn, largely a consequence of lower socioeconomic status and lack of private health insurance coverage among the African American population. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the need for policy changes aimed at facilitating equal access to quality medical care. At the same time, further research is necessary to fully resolve racial disparities in ovarian cancer.
Authors: Joellen M Schildkraut; Ellen L Goode; Merlise A Clyde; Edwin S Iversen; Patricia G Moorman; Andrew Berchuck; Jeffrey R Marks; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise Brinton; Beata Peplonska; Julie M Cunningham; Robert A Vierkant; David N Rider; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Penelope M Webb; Jonathan Beesley; Xiaoqing Chen; Catherine Phelan; Rebecca Sutphen; Thomas A Sellers; Leigh Pearce; Anna H Wu; David Van Den Berg; David Conti; Christopher K Elund; Rebecca Anderson; Marc T Goodman; Galina Lurie; Michael E Carney; Pamela J Thompson; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus; Ian Jacobs; Susanne Krüger Kjaer; Estrid Hogdall; Jan Blaakaer; Claus Hogdall; Douglas F Easton; Honglin Song; Paul D P Pharoah; Alice S Whittemore; Valerie McGuire; Lydia Quaye; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Kathryn L Terry; Daniel W Cramer; Susan E Hankinson; Shelley S Tworoger; Brian Calingaert; Stephen Chanock; Mark Sherman; Montserrat Garcia-Closas Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Michael J Hall; Julia E Reid; Lynn A Burbidge; Dmitry Pruss; Amie M Deffenbaugh; Cynthia Frye; Richard J Wenstrup; Brian E Ward; Thomas A Scholl; Walter W Noll Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ellen L Goode; Brooke L Fridley; Robert A Vierkant; Julie M Cunningham; Catherine M Phelan; Stephanie Anderson; David N Rider; Kristin L White; V Shane Pankratz; Honglin Song; Estrid Hogdall; Susanne K Kjaer; Alice S Whittemore; Richard DiCioccio; Susan J Ramus; Simon A Gayther; Joellen M Schildkraut; Paul P D Pharaoh; Thomas A Sellers Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Swantje Piszczan; Dawit Desalegn; Hezkiel Petros; Mengistu Gurmu; Eric Sven Kroeber; Adamu Addissie; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Rahel G Ghebre; Assefa Mathewos; Christoph Thomssen; Ahmedin Jemal; Eva Johanna Kantelhardt Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-04-25
Authors: Teresa K L Boitano; David A Barrington; Sadhvi Batra; Gerald McGwin; Taylor B Turner; Meagan B Farmer; Aimee M Brown; Michael J Straughn; Charles A Leath Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Bo Qin; Patricia G Moorman; Linda E Kelemen; Anthony J Alberg; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Melissa Bondy; Michele L Cote; Ellen Funkhouser; Edward S Peters; Ann G Schwartz; Paul Terry; Joellen M Schildkraut; Elisa V Bandera Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Elisa V Bandera; Valerie S Lee; Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez; C Bethan Powell; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J Vorwergk; M P Radosa; K Nicolaus; N Baus; J Jimenez Cruz; M Rengsberger; M Gajda; H Diebolder; I B Runnebaum Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 4.553