Literature DB >> 32142825

Black and Hispanic women are less likely than white women to receive guideline-concordant endometrial cancer treatment.

Mara Kaspers1, Elyse Llamocca1, Allison Quick2, Jhalak Dholakia3, Ritu Salani4, Ashley S Felix5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differences in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment might underlie well-established racial disparities in endometrial cancer mortality.
OBJECTIVE: Using the National Cancer Database, we assessed the hypothesis that among women with endometrioid endometrial cancer, racial/ethnic minority women would have lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment than white women. In addition, we hypothesized that lack of guideline-concordant treatment was linked with worse survival. STUDY
DESIGN: We defined receipt of guideline-concordant treatment using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between race and guideline-concordant treatment. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for relationships between guideline-concordant treatment and overall survival in the overall study population and stratified by race/ethnicity.
RESULTS: This analysis was restricted to the 89,319 women diagnosed with an invasive, endometrioid endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2014. Overall, 74.7% of the cohort received guideline-concordant treatment (n = 66,699). Analyses stratified by race showed that 75.3% of non-Hispanic white (n = 57,442), 70.1% of non-Hispanic black (n = 4334), 71.0% of Hispanic (n = 3263), and 72.5% of Asian/Pacific Islander patients (n = 1660) received treatment in concordance with guidelines. In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic black (odds ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.98) and Hispanic women (odds ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence internal, 0.83-0.97) had lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment compared with non-Hispanic white women, while Asian/Pacific Islander women had a higher odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment (odds ratio, 1.11, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.23). Lack of guideline-concordant treatment was associated with lower overall survival in the overall study population (hazard ratio, 1.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.15) but was not significantly associated with overall survival among non-Hispanic black (hazard ratio, 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.21), Hispanic (hazard ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval=0.78-1.09), or Asian/Pacific Islander (hazard ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.16) women.
CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women were less likely than non-Hispanic white women to receive guideline-concordant treatment, while Asian/Pacific Islander women more commonly received treatment in line with guidelines. Furthermore, in the overall study population, overall survival was worse among those not receiving guideline-concordant treatment, although low power may have had an impact on the race-stratified models. Future studies should evaluate reasons underlying disparate endometrial cancer treatment.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemotherapy; disparities; guideline-concordant treatment; hospital-based cancer registry; race; radiation treatment; uterus neoplasm

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32142825      PMCID: PMC7483220          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  47 in total

1.  Racial disparities in ovarian cancer surgical care: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Marianna L Zahurak; Okechukwu A Ibeanu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Disparities in receipt of care for high-grade endometrial cancer: A National Cancer Data Base analysis.

Authors:  Amy J Bregar; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Ryan Spencer; Joel T Clemmer; John O Schorge; Laurel W Rice; Marcela G Del Carmen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Pre-operative imaging, surgery and adjuvant therapy for women diagnosed with cancer of the corpus uteri in community practice in the United States.

Authors:  Edward L Trimble; Linda C Harlan; Limin X Clegg; Jennifer L Stevens
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  The Effects of Oncologist Implicit Racial Bias in Racially Discordant Oncology Interactions.

Authors:  Louis A Penner; John F Dovidio; Richard Gonzalez; Terrance L Albrecht; Robert Chapman; Tanina Foster; Felicity W K Harper; Nao Hagiwara; Lauren M Hamel; Anthony F Shields; Shirish Gadgeel; Michael S Simon; Jennifer J Griggs; Susan Eggly
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  International Patterns and Trends in Endometrial Cancer Incidence, 1978-2013.

Authors:  Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Jacques Ferlay; Freddie Bray; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Insurance status and racial differences in uterine cancer survival: a study of patients in the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  S A Fedewa; C Lerro; D Chase; E M Ward
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Adjuvant Treatment and Clinical Trials in Elderly Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Time for Change?

Authors:  Leslie H Clark; Amanda L Jackson; Paola A Gehrig; Victoria Bae-Jump; Linda Van Le; Emily M Ko
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Perceived discrimination is associated with reduced breast and cervical cancer screening: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jacobs; Paul J Rathouz; Kelly Karavolos; Susan A Everson-Rose; Imke Janssen; Howard M Kravitz; Tené T Lewis; Lynda H Powell
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Differences in treatment and outcome between African-American and white women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Thomas C Randall; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  8 in total

1.  More than treatment refusal: a National Cancer Database analysis of adjuvant treatment refusal and racial survival disparities among women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  David A Barrington; Jennifer A Sinnott; Danaye Nixon; Tasleem J Padamsee; David E Cohn; Kemi M Doll; Macarius M Donneyong; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 10.693

2.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Mortality by Stage and Histologic Subtype.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Susan S Devesa; Anne Hammer; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 33.006

3.  Guideline-concordant treatment is associated with improved survival among women with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jhalak Dholakia; Elyse Llamocca; Allison Quick; Ritu Salani; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Socioeconomic inequality and omission of adjuvant radiation therapy in high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Leo Y Luo; Emeline M Aviki; Anna Lee; Marisa A Kollmeier; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; C Jillian Tsai; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  A 4-Gene Signature Associated With Recurrence in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Diocésio Alves Pinto de Andrade; Luciane Sussuchi da Silva; Ana Carolina Laus; Marcos Alves de Lima; Gustavo Nóriz Berardinelli; Vinicius Duval da Silva; Graziela de Macedo Matsushita; Murilo Bonatelli; Aline Larissa Virginio da Silva; Adriane Feijó Evangelista; Jesus Paula Carvalho; Rui Manuel Reis; Ricardo Dos Reis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Disparities in cancer-specific and overall survival in black women with endometrial cancer: A Medicare-SEER study.

Authors:  Daniel H Saris; Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith; Colleen Brensinger; Sarah H Kim; Ashley F Haggerty; Nawar Latif; Lori Cory; Robert L Giuntoli; Mark A Morgan; Lilie L Lin; Emily M Ko
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-01-06

7.  Guideline-adherent treatment, sociodemographic disparities, and cause-specific survival for endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Victoria E Rodriguez; Alana M W LeBrón; Jenny Chang; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.921

8.  Identifying a molecular profile to predict the risk of recurrence in high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca C Arend; Carly B Scalise; Jhalak Dholakia; Maahum Z Kamal; Haley B Thigpen; David Crossman; Warner K Huh; Charles A Leath
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.