Mara Kaspers1, Elyse Llamocca1, Allison Quick2, Jhalak Dholakia3, Ritu Salani4, Ashley S Felix5. 1. Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 4. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 5. Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: Felix.20@osu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differences in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment might underlie well-established racial disparities in endometrial cancer mortality. OBJECTIVE: Using the National Cancer Database, we assessed the hypothesis that among women with endometrioid endometrial cancer, racial/ethnic minority women would have lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment than white women. In addition, we hypothesized that lack of guideline-concordant treatment was linked with worse survival. STUDY DESIGN: We defined receipt of guideline-concordant treatment using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between race and guideline-concordant treatment. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for relationships between guideline-concordant treatment and overall survival in the overall study population and stratified by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: This analysis was restricted to the 89,319 women diagnosed with an invasive, endometrioid endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2014. Overall, 74.7% of the cohort received guideline-concordant treatment (n = 66,699). Analyses stratified by race showed that 75.3% of non-Hispanic white (n = 57,442), 70.1% of non-Hispanic black (n = 4334), 71.0% of Hispanic (n = 3263), and 72.5% of Asian/Pacific Islander patients (n = 1660) received treatment in concordance with guidelines. In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic black (odds ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.98) and Hispanic women (odds ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence internal, 0.83-0.97) had lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment compared with non-Hispanic white women, while Asian/Pacific Islander women had a higher odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment (odds ratio, 1.11, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.23). Lack of guideline-concordant treatment was associated with lower overall survival in the overall study population (hazard ratio, 1.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.15) but was not significantly associated with overall survival among non-Hispanic black (hazard ratio, 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.21), Hispanic (hazard ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval=0.78-1.09), or Asian/Pacific Islander (hazard ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.16) women. CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women were less likely than non-Hispanic white women to receive guideline-concordant treatment, while Asian/Pacific Islander women more commonly received treatment in line with guidelines. Furthermore, in the overall study population, overall survival was worse among those not receiving guideline-concordant treatment, although low power may have had an impact on the race-stratified models. Future studies should evaluate reasons underlying disparate endometrial cancer treatment.
BACKGROUND: Differences in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment might underlie well-established racial disparities in endometrial cancermortality. OBJECTIVE: Using the National Cancer Database, we assessed the hypothesis that among women with endometrioid endometrial cancer, racial/ethnic minority women would have lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment than white women. In addition, we hypothesized that lack of guideline-concordant treatment was linked with worse survival. STUDY DESIGN: We defined receipt of guideline-concordant treatment using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between race and guideline-concordant treatment. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for relationships between guideline-concordant treatment and overall survival in the overall study population and stratified by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: This analysis was restricted to the 89,319 women diagnosed with an invasive, endometrioid endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2014. Overall, 74.7% of the cohort received guideline-concordant treatment (n = 66,699). Analyses stratified by race showed that 75.3% of non-Hispanic white (n = 57,442), 70.1% of non-Hispanic black (n = 4334), 71.0% of Hispanic (n = 3263), and 72.5% of Asian/Pacific Islander patients (n = 1660) received treatment in concordance with guidelines. In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic black (odds ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.98) and Hispanic women (odds ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence internal, 0.83-0.97) had lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment compared with non-Hispanic white women, while Asian/Pacific Islander women had a higher odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment (odds ratio, 1.11, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.23). Lack of guideline-concordant treatment was associated with lower overall survival in the overall study population (hazard ratio, 1.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.15) but was not significantly associated with overall survival among non-Hispanic black (hazard ratio, 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.21), Hispanic (hazard ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval=0.78-1.09), or Asian/Pacific Islander (hazard ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.16) women. CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women were less likely than non-Hispanic white women to receive guideline-concordant treatment, while Asian/Pacific Islander women more commonly received treatment in line with guidelines. Furthermore, in the overall study population, overall survival was worse among those not receiving guideline-concordant treatment, although low power may have had an impact on the race-stratified models. Future studies should evaluate reasons underlying disparate endometrial cancer treatment.
Authors: Amy J Bregar; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Ryan Spencer; Joel T Clemmer; John O Schorge; Laurel W Rice; Marcela G Del Carmen Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Louis A Penner; John F Dovidio; Richard Gonzalez; Terrance L Albrecht; Robert Chapman; Tanina Foster; Felicity W K Harper; Nao Hagiwara; Lauren M Hamel; Anthony F Shields; Shirish Gadgeel; Michael S Simon; Jennifer J Griggs; Susan Eggly Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Leslie H Clark; Amanda L Jackson; Paola A Gehrig; Victoria Bae-Jump; Linda Van Le; Emily M Ko Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Elizabeth A Jacobs; Paul J Rathouz; Kelly Karavolos; Susan A Everson-Rose; Imke Janssen; Howard M Kravitz; Tené T Lewis; Lynda H Powell Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: David A Barrington; Jennifer A Sinnott; Danaye Nixon; Tasleem J Padamsee; David E Cohn; Kemi M Doll; Macarius M Donneyong; Ashley S Felix Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 10.693
Authors: Leo Y Luo; Emeline M Aviki; Anna Lee; Marisa A Kollmeier; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; C Jillian Tsai; Kaled M Alektiar Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Diocésio Alves Pinto de Andrade; Luciane Sussuchi da Silva; Ana Carolina Laus; Marcos Alves de Lima; Gustavo Nóriz Berardinelli; Vinicius Duval da Silva; Graziela de Macedo Matsushita; Murilo Bonatelli; Aline Larissa Virginio da Silva; Adriane Feijó Evangelista; Jesus Paula Carvalho; Rui Manuel Reis; Ricardo Dos Reis Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Daniel H Saris; Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith; Colleen Brensinger; Sarah H Kim; Ashley F Haggerty; Nawar Latif; Lori Cory; Robert L Giuntoli; Mark A Morgan; Lilie L Lin; Emily M Ko Journal: Gynecol Oncol Rep Date: 2022-01-06
Authors: Rebecca C Arend; Carly B Scalise; Jhalak Dholakia; Maahum Z Kamal; Haley B Thigpen; David Crossman; Warner K Huh; Charles A Leath Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 4.452