Literature DB >> 25173584

The effect of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on racial differences in ovarian cancer treatment in a population-based analysis in Chicago.

Charlotte E Joslin1, Katherine C Brewer2, Faith G Davis3, Kent Hoskins4, Caryn E Peterson2, Heather A Pauls5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Less than half of women with ovarian cancer and blacks specifically receive therapy adherent to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. The purpose is to assess the effect of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) on black-white treatment differences in a population-based analysis in a highly-segregated community.
METHODS: Illinois State Cancer Registry data for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in Cook County, IL in non-Hispanic white (NHW) or black (NHB) women from 1998 to 2009 was analyzed. As few women receive NCCN-adherent care, variables were constructed to assess extent of treatment, including receipt of: 1) debulking surgery; 2) any surgery; 3) multi-agent chemotherapy; and 4) any chemotherapy. Two measures (concentrated affluence and disadvantage) were used to estimate neighborhood-level SES. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), with generalized linear mixed models to account for hierarchical data.
RESULTS: 2766 (81.0%) NHW and 647 (19.0%) NHB women were diagnosed. Adjusting for covariates, NHB were less likely to receive debulking surgery (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.30-0.50), any surgery (OR: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.29-0.49), multi-agent chemotherapy (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.45-0.71) and any chemotherapy (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.74). Concentrated affluence but not disadvantage was significant in final models for multi-agent and any chemotherapy, but not debulking or any surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Results identify black-white differences consistent across treatments that persist despite adjustment for neighborhood-level SES. IMPACT: Results advance inequality awareness beyond "ideal" NCCN-adherent care, indicating inequality exists in delivery of even the most basic oncologic care.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comorbidities; Neighborhood socioeconomic status; Ovarian cancer; Racial disparities; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25173584      PMCID: PMC4443897          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  73 in total

1.  Racial disparities in diabetes mortality in the 50 most populous US cities.

Authors:  Summer Rosenstock; Steve Whitman; Joseph F West; Michael Balkin
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England.

Authors:  Eva J A Morris; Elizabeth F Taylor; James D Thomas; Philip Quirke; Paul J Finan; Michel P Coleman; Bernard Rachet; David Forman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Disparities in the allocation of treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: are there certain patient characteristics associated with nonstandard therapy?

Authors:  Dana M Chase; Stacey Fedewa; Tatiana Stanisic Chou; Amy Chen; Elizabeth Ward; Wendy R Brewster
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Comorbid illnesses and health care utilization among Medicare beneficiaries with lung cancer.

Authors:  Sydney M Dy; Phoebe Sharkey; Robert Herbert; Kathleen Haddad; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Assessing the initiation and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy in a large nationwide and population-based cohort of elderly patients with stage-III colon cancer.

Authors:  Chung-Yuan Hu; George L Delclos; Wenyaw Chan; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Survival and prognostic factors in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Solveig Tingulstad; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Tore B Halvorsen; Bjørn Hagen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Improved prognosis of ovarian cancer in The Netherlands during the period 1975-1985: a registry-based study.

Authors:  H R Balvert-Locht; J W Coebergh; W C Hop; H A Brölmann; M Crommelin; D J van Wijck; M T Verhagen-Teulings
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Ovarian cancer: screening, treatment, and follow-up.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  A community effort to reduce the black/white breast cancer mortality disparity in Chicago.

Authors:  David Ansell; Paula Grabler; Steven Whitman; Carol Ferrans; Jacqueline Burgess-Bishop; Linda Rae Murray; Ruta Rao; Elizabeth Marcus
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of surgery and chemotherapy on survival during 1977-1990.

Authors:  P Venesmaa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  7 in total

1.  Neighborhood-Based Socioeconomic Position and Risk of Oral Clefts Among Offspring.

Authors:  Philip J Lupo; Heather E Danysh; Elaine Symanski; Peter H Langlois; Yi Cai; Michael D Swartz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The influence of neighborhood socioeconomic status and race on survival from ovarian cancer: a population-based analysis of Cook County, Illinois.

Authors:  Katherine C Brewer; Caryn E Peterson; Faith G Davis; Kent Hoskins; Heather Pauls; Charlotte E Joslin
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Racial disparities in individual breast cancer outcomes by hormone-receptor subtype, area-level socio-economic status and healthcare resources.

Authors:  Tomi Akinyemiju; Justin Xavier Moore; Akinyemi I Ojesina; John W Waterbor; Sean F Altekruse
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  The effect of neighborhood disadvantage on the racial disparity in ovarian cancer-specific survival in a large hospital-based study in cook county, illinois.

Authors:  Caryn E Peterson; Garth H Rauscher; Timothy P Johnson; Carolyn V Kirschner; Sally Freels; Richard E Barrett; Seijeoung Kim; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Charlotte E Joslin; Faith G Davis
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-01-22

Review 5.  Racial health disparities in ovarian cancer: not just black and white.

Authors:  Sanjeev K Srivastava; Aamir Ahmad; Orlandric Miree; Girijesh Kumar Patel; Seema Singh; Rodney P Rocconi; Ajay P Singh
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Health-Care Access Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Treatment and Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shama Karanth; Mackenzie E Fowler; XiHua Mao; Lauren E Wilson; Bin Huang; Maria Pisu; Arnold Potosky; Tom Tucker; Tomi Akinyemiju
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-10-09

Review 7.  Systematic review of neighborhood socioeconomic indices studied across the cancer control continuum.

Authors:  Kristen A Sorice; Carolyn Y Fang; Daniel Wiese; Angel Ortiz; Yuku Chen; Kevin A Henry; Shannon M Lynch
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.711

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.