Literature DB >> 21627924

Red cell transfusion in orthopaedic surgery: a benchmark study performed combining data from different data sources.

Franco Verlicchi1, Fausto Desalvo, Gabriele Zanotti, Loretta Morotti, Ivana Tomasini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown the usefulness of combining information from different data sources to identify and analyse variations in transfusion practices. Good knowledge of the conditions leading to blood use is a fundamental requirement for the assessment of the appropriateness of blood transfusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study we combined blood transfusion data obtained from the Blood Bank information system with patients' data from the Hospital Discharge Database, based on the ICD9 classification system, from 1,827 surgical procedures performed in seven different orthopaedic divisions in the Ravenna area between January and December 2009. Hip and knee replacement surgery (primary or revision) and operations following femoral fractures (partial hip replacement and reduction with internal fixation) were considered. For a subgroup of patients clinical and transfusion data were also combined with haemoglobin values obtained from the laboratory information system.
RESULTS: Of the 1,827 surgical procedures, 1,038 (56.8%) were followed by transfusion of red cells. The likelihood of receiving a transfusion varied depending on the patient's sex (49% for males, 60% for females), age, and on the surgical procedure, being higher for interventions following femoral fractures and for revisions of hip replacement: about 70% of patients undergoing these interventions required transfusion. A large variability in transfusion rates was observed between the seven divisions, which was only partially explained by the different types of surgery (post-traumatic or elective) performed by any of them: relevant variations were also observed for the same type of intervention. DISCUSSION: Combining information from different data sources could be a time-sparing way to gain useful information about transfusion practices, so contributing to optimising blood usage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21627924      PMCID: PMC3200406          DOI: 10.2450/2011.0095-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Transfus        ISSN: 1723-2007            Impact factor:   3.443


  11 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; R E Thomas; G MacLennan; C Fraser; C R Ramsay; L Vale; P Whitty; M P Eccles; L Matowe; L Shirran; M Wensing; R Dijkstra; C Donaldson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  G Jamtvedt; J M Young; D T Kristoffersen; M A O'Brien; A D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

3.  Adequacy of physician documentation of red blood cell transfusion and correlation with assessment of transfusion appropriateness.

Authors:  Mark T Friedman; Amber Ebrahim
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 4.  Clinical quality improvement information for transfusion practice.

Authors:  Brian McClelland
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Blood use in elective surgery: the Austrian benchmark study.

Authors:  Hans Gombotz; Peter H Rehak; Aryeh Shander; Axel Hofmann
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Optimizing blood usage through benchmarking.

Authors:  Tiina Maki
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Use of fresh-frozen plasma at Royal Darwin Hospital: a retrospective audit.

Authors:  S Moylan; F Szabo; H Scott; G Kwok
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.048

Review 8.  Clinical appropriateness of blood component transfusion: regulatory requirements and standards set by the Scientific Society in Italy.

Authors:  Giuliano Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.443

9.  Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group.

Authors:  L A Bero; R Grilli; J M Grimshaw; E Harvey; A D Oxman; M A Thomson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-15

10.  Audit of the clinical use of fresh-frozen plasma in Umbria: study design and results of the pilot phase.

Authors:  Alfonso Iorio; Michela Basileo; Emanuela Marchesini; Gian Paolo Palazzesi; Mario Materazzi; Mauro Marchesi; Antonella Esposito; Lucio Pellegrini; Antonella Germani; Lauretta Rocchetti; Carla Maria Silvani
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.443

View more
  15 in total

1.  Blood transfusion practices: a little consistency please.

Authors:  Mark T Friedman
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Restrictive transfusion triggers in major orthopaedic surgery: effective and safe?

Authors:  Manuel Muñoz; Santiago Ramón Leal-Noval
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Odds of transfusion for older adults compared to younger adults undergoing surgery.

Authors:  Charles H Brown; William J Savage; Courtney G Masear; Jeremy D Walston; Jing Tian; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Charles W Hogue; Steven M Frank
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Variation in prophylactic tranexamic acid administration among anesthesiologists and surgeons in orthopedic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Brett L Houston; Dean A Fergusson; Jamie Falk; Robert Ariano; Donald S Houston; Emily Krupka; Anna Blankstein; Iris Perelman; Rodney H Breau; Daniel I McIsaac; Emily Rimmer; Allan Garland; Alan Tinmouth; Robert Balshaw; Alexis F Turgeon; Eric Jacobsohn; Eric Bohm; Ryan Zarychanski
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Monitoring compliance with transfusion guidelines in hospital departments by electronic data capture.

Authors:  Astrid Norgaard; Trine Honnens De Lichtenberg; Jens Nielsen; Pär I Johansson
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  Tranexamic acid for reducing blood transfusions in arthroplasty interventions: a cost-effective practice.

Authors:  Federica Vigna-Taglianti; Leonardo Basso; Paola Rolfo; Romeo Brambilla; Federica Vaccari; Gisella Lanci; Roberto Russo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-04-30

7.  A restrictive policy for red blood cell transfusion in older hip fracture patients: experiences from a patient register.

Authors:  Mette Irene Martinsen; Haldor Valland; Ludvig Fjeld Solheim; Kristin Holvik; Anette Ranhoff
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-02-09

8.  Protocol for a national blood transfusion data warehouse from donor to recipient.

Authors:  Loan R van Hoeven; Babette H Hooftman; Mart P Janssen; Martine C de Bruijne; Karen M K de Vooght; Peter Kemper; Maria M W Koopman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Benchmarking the use of blood products in cardiac surgery to stimulate awareness of transfusion behaviour : Results from a four-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  C Brouwers; B Hooftman; S Vonk; A Vonk; W Stooker; W H Te Gussinklo; R M Wesselink; C Wagner; M C de Bruijne
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Preoperative risk factors for postoperative blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery: establishment of a nomogram.

Authors:  Fu Cheng Bian; Xiao Kang Cheng; Yong Sheng An
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.