Charles H Brown1, William J Savage, Courtney G Masear, Jeremy D Walston, Jing Tian, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Charles W Hogue, Steven M Frank. 1. From the *Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, †Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; ‡ and †Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and §Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials have shown no benefit for transfusion to a hemoglobin >10 g/dL compared with lower hemoglobin thresholds in the perioperative period, even among older adults. Nevertheless, physicians may choose to transfuse older adults more liberally than younger adults. It is unclear whether older patients have higher odds than younger patients of being transfused in the perioperative period. Our objective in this study was to determine whether the odds of transfusion are higher in older patients than in younger patients in the perioperative period. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective observational cohort study at a tertiary care academic medical center. We included adults who had undergone a surgical procedure as an inpatient at our institution from January 2010 to February 2012. The primary analysis compared the odds of transfusion for patients >65 years old with the odds of transfusion in younger patients based on multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses including adjustment for comorbidities, surgical service, lowest in-hospital hemoglobin value, gender, and estimated surgical blood loss and accounted for clustering by the surgeon and procedure. RESULTS: We included 20,930 patients in this analysis. In multilevel models adjusted for comorbidities, surgical service, estimated surgical blood loss, and lowest in-hospital hemoglobin value, with surgeon and procedure as random effects, patients > 65 years old had 62% greater odds (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.88; P < 0.0001) of being transfused than did younger patients. When patients were stratified by lowest in-hospital hemoglobin (7.00-7.99, 8.00-8.99, 9.00-9.99, and ≥10.00 g/dL), the odds of transfusion generally increased with each additional decade of age in every stratum, except for that containing patients in whom the lowest in-hospital hemoglobin did not decrease below 10 g/dL. When the odds of transfusion were compared between younger and older patients, significant differences were observed among surgical services (P = 0.02) but not among anesthesia specialty divisions (P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults have greater odds of receiving red blood cell transfusion in the perioperative period than do younger patients, despite the lack of evidence supporting higher hemoglobin triggers in elderly patients. Further research is needed to determine whether transfusion practice in the elderly is an opportunity for education to improve blood management.
BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials have shown no benefit for transfusion to a hemoglobin >10 g/dL compared with lower hemoglobin thresholds in the perioperative period, even among older adults. Nevertheless, physicians may choose to transfuse older adults more liberally than younger adults. It is unclear whether older patients have higher odds than younger patients of being transfused in the perioperative period. Our objective in this study was to determine whether the odds of transfusion are higher in older patients than in younger patients in the perioperative period. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective observational cohort study at a tertiary care academic medical center. We included adults who had undergone a surgical procedure as an inpatient at our institution from January 2010 to February 2012. The primary analysis compared the odds of transfusion for patients >65 years old with the odds of transfusion in younger patients based on multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses including adjustment for comorbidities, surgical service, lowest in-hospital hemoglobin value, gender, and estimated surgical blood loss and accounted for clustering by the surgeon and procedure. RESULTS: We included 20,930 patients in this analysis. In multilevel models adjusted for comorbidities, surgical service, estimated surgical blood loss, and lowest in-hospital hemoglobin value, with surgeon and procedure as random effects, patients > 65 years old had 62% greater odds (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.88; P < 0.0001) of being transfused than did younger patients. When patients were stratified by lowest in-hospital hemoglobin (7.00-7.99, 8.00-8.99, 9.00-9.99, and ≥10.00 g/dL), the odds of transfusion generally increased with each additional decade of age in every stratum, except for that containing patients in whom the lowest in-hospital hemoglobin did not decrease below 10 g/dL. When the odds of transfusion were compared between younger and older patients, significant differences were observed among surgical services (P = 0.02) but not among anesthesia specialty divisions (P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults have greater odds of receiving red blood cell transfusion in the perioperative period than do younger patients, despite the lack of evidence supporting higher hemoglobin triggers in elderly patients. Further research is needed to determine whether transfusion practice in the elderly is an opportunity for education to improve blood management.
Authors: Jeffrey L Carson; Michael L Terrin; Helaine Noveck; David W Sanders; Bernard R Chaitman; George G Rhoads; George Nemo; Karen Dragert; Lauren Beaupre; Kevin Hildebrand; William Macaulay; Courtland Lewis; Donald Richard Cook; Gwendolyn Dobbin; Khwaja J Zakriya; Fred S Apple; Rebecca A Horney; Jay Magaziner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven M Frank; Will J Savage; Jim A Rothschild; Richard J Rivers; Paul M Ness; Sharon L Paul; John A Ulatowski Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Steven M Frank; Linda M S Resar; James A Rothschild; Elizabeth A Dackiw; Will J Savage; Paul M Ness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Wilbert S Aronow; Jerome L Fleg; Carl J Pepine; Nancy T Artinian; George Bakris; Alan S Brown; Keith C Ferdinand; Mary Ann Forciea; William H Frishman; Cheryl Jaigobin; John B Kostis; Giuseppi Mancia; Suzanne Oparil; Eduardo Ortiz; Efrain Reisin; Michael W Rich; Douglas D Schocken; Michael A Weber; Deborah J Wesley Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Lena M Napolitano; Stanley Kurek; Fred A Luchette; Howard L Corwin; Philip S Barie; Samuel A Tisherman; Paul C Hebert; Gary L Anderson; Michael R Bard; William Bromberg; William C Chiu; Mark D Cipolle; Keith D Clancy; Lawrence Diebel; William S Hoff; K Michael Hughes; Imtiaz Munshi; Donna Nayduch; Rovinder Sandhu; Jay A Yelon Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Càndid Villanueva; Alan Colomo; Alba Bosch; Mar Concepción; Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Carles Aracil; Isabel Graupera; María Poca; Cristina Alvarez-Urturi; Jordi Gordillo; Carlos Guarner-Argente; Miquel Santaló; Eduardo Muñiz; Carlos Guarner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Linda Grüßer; András Keszei; Mark Coburn; Rolf Rossaint; Sebastian Ziemann; Ana Kowark Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eline A Vlot; Lisa Verwijmeren; Ewoudt M W van de Garde; Geoffrey T L Kloppenburg; Eric P A van Dongen; Peter G Noordzij Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 2.217