BACKGROUND: We evaluated the validity and responsiveness of three instruments: the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8), and the 40-item Quality of Recovery from Anesthesia (QoR) Survey in 154 outpatients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The objective was to provide a robust psychometric basis for outcome survey selection for surgical outpatients undergoing regional anesthesia without general anesthesia. METHODS:Patients undergoing ACLR with a standardized spinal anesthesia plan were randomized to receive a perineural catheter with either placebo injection-infusion, or injection-infusion with levobupivacaine. Patients completed the NRS, SF-8, and QoR instruments for four postoperative days to evaluate pain, physical function, and mental function. RESULTS: Regarding pain, neither the NRS nor the QoR offered advantages over the SF-8. Regarding physical function, the QoR physical independence composite offered no advantage over the SF-8 physical component summary. The QoR physical comfort composite assessed short-term changes in treatment-related side effects, and thus provided information not covered by the SF-8. Regarding mental function, the SF-8 mental component summary and QoR emotional state composite showed little change over the four days, although the latter measure showed higher responsiveness to change. CONCLUSIONS: For ACLR outpatients receiving regional anesthesia, the SF-8 is sufficient to assess postoperative pain and physical function. Adding the QoR physical comfort composite will help assess short-term side effects.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the validity and responsiveness of three instruments: the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8), and the 40-item Quality of Recovery from Anesthesia (QoR) Survey in 154 outpatients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The objective was to provide a robust psychometric basis for outcome survey selection for surgical outpatients undergoing regional anesthesia without general anesthesia. METHODS:Patients undergoing ACLR with a standardized spinal anesthesia plan were randomized to receive a perineural catheter with either placebo injection-infusion, or injection-infusion with levobupivacaine. Patients completed the NRS, SF-8, and QoR instruments for four postoperative days to evaluate pain, physical function, and mental function. RESULTS: Regarding pain, neither the NRS nor the QoR offered advantages over the SF-8. Regarding physical function, the QoR physical independence composite offered no advantage over the SF-8 physical component summary. The QoR physical comfort composite assessed short-term changes in treatment-related side effects, and thus provided information not covered by the SF-8. Regarding mental function, the SF-8 mental component summary and QoR emotional state composite showed little change over the four days, although the latter measure showed higher responsiveness to change. CONCLUSIONS: For ACLR outpatients receiving regional anesthesia, the SF-8 is sufficient to assess postoperative pain and physical function. Adding the QoR physical comfort composite will help assess short-term side effects.
Authors: Thomas A Aloia; Bradford J Kim; Yun Shin Segraves-Chun; Juan P Cata; Mark J Truty; Qiuling Shi; Alexander Holmes; Jose M Soliz; Keyuri U Popat; Thomas F Rahlfs; Jeffrey E Lee; Xin Shelley Wang; Jeffrey S Morris; Vijaya N R Gottumukkala; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Carlton D Dampier; Wally R Smith; Carrie G Wager; Hae-Young Kim; Margaret C Bell; Scott T Miller; Debra L Weiner; Caterina P Minniti; Lakshmanan Krishnamurti; Kenneth I Ataga; James R Eckman; Lewis L Hsu; Donna McClish; Sonja M McKinlay; Robert Molokie; Ifeyinwa Osunkwo; Kim Smith-Whitley; Marilyn J Telen Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: J T Yadeau; E A Goytizolo; D E Padgett; S S Liu; D J Mayman; A S Ranawat; M C Rade; G H Westrich Journal: Bone Joint J Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 5.082
Authors: Trevor A Lentz; Susan M Tillman; Peter A Indelicato; Michael W Moser; Steven Z George; Terese L Chmielewski Journal: Sports Health Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.843