A C Looker1, L J Melton, L G Borrud, J A Shepherd. 1. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Room 4310, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA. ALooker@cdc.gov
Abstract
SUMMARY: This analysis compares femur neck bone mineral density (FNBMD) and bone determinants in adults between National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988-1994) and NHANES 2005-2008. FNBMD was higher in NHANES 2005-2008 than in NHANES III, but between-survey differences varied by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The likelihood that FNBMD has improved appears strongest for older white women. INTRODUCTION: Recent data on hip fracture incidence and femur neck osteoporosis suggest that the skeletal status of older US adults has improved since the 1990s, but the explanation for these changes remains uncertain. METHODS: The present study compares mean FNBMD of adults ages 20 years and older between the third (NHANES III, 1988-1994) and NHANES 2005-2008. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems (pencil beam in NHANES III, fan beam in NHANES 2005-2008) were used to measure hip BMD, and several bone determinants are compared between surveys to assess their potential role in explaining observed FNBMD differences. RESULTS: FNBMD was higher overall in NHANES 2005-2008 than in NHANES III, but between-survey differences varied by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Although FNBMD differences in several groups were small enough (≤3%) to be attributable to use of different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems in the two surveys, variability in size and direction of the differences does not support artifactual differences in DXA methodology as the sole explanation. Several FNBMD determinants (body size, smoking, selected bone-active medications, self-reported health status, calcium intake, and caffeine consumption) changed in a bone-improving direction in older adults, but FNBMD in older non-Hispanic white women remained significantly higher in 2005-2008 even after adjusting for DXA methodology or for the selected bone determinants. CONCLUSION: The likelihood that FNBMD has improved appears strongest for older white women, but the reason for the improvement in this group remains unclear.
SUMMARY: This analysis compares femur neck bone mineral density (FNBMD) and bone determinants in adults between National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988-1994) and NHANES 2005-2008. FNBMD was higher in NHANES 2005-2008 than in NHANES III, but between-survey differences varied by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The likelihood that FNBMD has improved appears strongest for older white women. INTRODUCTION: Recent data on hip fracture incidence and femur neck osteoporosis suggest that the skeletal status of older US adults has improved since the 1990s, but the explanation for these changes remains uncertain. METHODS: The present study compares mean FNBMD of adults ages 20 years and older between the third (NHANES III, 1988-1994) and NHANES 2005-2008. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems (pencil beam in NHANES III, fan beam in NHANES 2005-2008) were used to measure hip BMD, and several bone determinants are compared between surveys to assess their potential role in explaining observed FNBMD differences. RESULTS: FNBMD was higher overall in NHANES 2005-2008 than in NHANES III, but between-survey differences varied by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Although FNBMD differences in several groups were small enough (≤3%) to be attributable to use of different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems in the two surveys, variability in size and direction of the differences does not support artifactual differences in DXA methodology as the sole explanation. Several FNBMD determinants (body size, smoking, selected bone-active medications, self-reported health status, calcium intake, and caffeine consumption) changed in a bone-improving direction in older adults, but FNBMD in older non-Hispanic white women remained significantly higher in 2005-2008 even after adjusting for DXA methodology or for the selected bone determinants. CONCLUSION: The likelihood that FNBMD has improved appears strongest for older white women, but the reason for the improvement in this group remains unclear.
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sarah Henzell; Satvinder S Dhaliwal; Roger I Price; Faye Gill; Chandra Ventouras; Carmel Green; Fatima Da Fonseca; Marianne Holzherr; Richard Prince Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.963
Authors: Cher M Dallal; Jeffrey A Tice; Diana S M Buist; Douglas C Bauer; James V Lacey; Jane A Cauley; Trisha F Hue; Andrea Lacroix; Roni T Falk; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Barbara J Fuhrman; Timothy D Veenstra; Xia Xu; Louise A Brinton Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Elaine Cheung; Cora Bow; Connie Loong; K K Lee; A Y Y Ho; Cissy Soong; Y Y Chan; Kathyn C B Tan; Annie W C Kung Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: Nicole C Wright; Anne C Looker; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis; Elizabeth S Delzell; Susan Randall; Bess Dawson-Hughes Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: J C Lo; P Zheng; C D Grimsrud; M Chandra; B Ettinger; A Budayr; G Lau; M M Baur; R L Hui; R Neugebauer Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 4.507