Literature DB >> 8086904

Relation between increase in length of hip axis in older women between 1950s and 1990s and increase in age specific rates of hip fracture.

I R Reid1, K Chin, M C Evans, J G Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether length of hip axis in elderly women has increased over the past 40 years and, if so, whether the increase may have contributed to the increase in the age adjusted rate of hip fractures during those years.
DESIGN: Retrospective assessment of anteroposterior x ray films of the pelvis.
SETTING: Radiology department of a rheumatology hospital, New Zealand. PATIENTS: Two cohorts of women aged > 60 (mean 70) who were x rayed on the same apparatus in either the 1950s or the 1990s. MAIN OUTCOME: Length of hip axis (distance from the medial aspect of the pelvis to the lateral aspect of the femur along the axis of the femoral neck), length of femoral neck (length of hip axis excluding the femoral head and more medial structures), and width of femoral neck (see figure).
RESULTS: Both the mean length of the hip axis and the mean length of the femoral neck were significantly greater in the women whose x ray films were taken in the 1990s than in those in the 1950s (124.0 mm (SE 1) v 130.5 (1), P = 0.0002; 79.4 (1) v 84.9 (1), P < 0.0001, respectively). The width of the femoral neck did not change, and the lengths expressed as ratios to width were greater in the more recent x ray films, indicating that these findings are not due to an unrecognised change in radiographic technique.
CONCLUSIONS: An increase in the length of the hip axis in elderly women in New Zealand during the past 40 years has occurred which is large enough to account for the increase in the age adjusted rate of hip fractures during those years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8086904      PMCID: PMC2542715          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6953.508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  Hip fractures: a future epidemic?

Authors:  P R Rockwood; J G Horne; C Cryer
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Age and sex patterns of hip fracture--changes in 30 years.

Authors:  O Johnell; B Nilsson; K Obrant; I Sernbo
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1984-06

3.  Secular increase and geographical differences in hip fracture incidence in Norway.

Authors:  J A Falch; T S Kaastad; G Bøhler; J Espeland; O J Sundsvold
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Fractures of the proximal end of the femur in Göteborg, Sweden, 1940-1979.

Authors:  C Zetterberg; G B Andersson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1982-06

5.  Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; S R Cummings; D Black; L Palermo; C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  The increasing incidence of fractures of the proximal femur: an orthopaedic epidemic.

Authors:  W A Wallace
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-06-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Rising incidence of fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  W J Boyce; M P Vessey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

  7 in total
  19 in total

1.  Hip axis length in mid-life Japanese and Caucasian U.S. residents: no evidence for an ethnic difference.

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; Jean T Young; Mei-Hua Huang; Alexander Bucur; Yan Wang; Teresa Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Secular trends in proximal femoral fracture, Oxford record linkage study area and England 1968-86.

Authors:  J G Evans; V Seagroatt; M J Goldacre
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Proximal hip geometry is linked to several chromosomal regions: genome-wide linkage results from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  S Demissie; J Dupuis; L A Cupples; T J Beck; D P Kiel; D Karasik
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Changes in femur neck bone density in US adults between 1988-1994 and 2005-2008: demographic patterns and possible determinants.

Authors:  A C Looker; L J Melton; L G Borrud; J A Shepherd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Clinical usefulness of risk factors for osteoporosis.

Authors:  S A Earnshaw; D J Hosking
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Changing proximal femoral geometry in north east Scotland: an osteometric study.

Authors:  R A Duthie; M F Bruce; J D Hutchison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-16

7.  Direct costs of osteoporosis for New Zealand women.

Authors:  A Lane
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Differences in hip axis and femoral neck length in premenopausal women of Polynesian, Asian and European origin.

Authors:  K Chin; M C Evans; J Cornish; T Cundy; I R Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Length of hip axis and rate of hip fracture.

Authors:  C Todd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-11

10.  Length of femoral neck and rates of hip fractures. Measurements may not be reliable.

Authors:  A Høiseth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.