Literature DB >> 16875335

Influence of anthropometric parameters and bone size on bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry at the hip.

G Guglielmi1, C van Kuijk, J Li, M D Meta, A Scillitani, T F Lang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of anthropometric parameters (age, height, and weight) and bone size on bone mineral density (BMD) using volumetric quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a group of elderly women.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: BMD values were obtained with DXA and QCT at the spine and hip in a cohort of 84 elderly women (mean age 73 +/- 6 years). QCT measures included trabecular, integral, and cortical BMD assessed at the hip and spine as well as cross-sectional areas of the mid-vertebrae and proximal femora. Spinal integral and femoral neck BMD measures were well matched to the regions of bone quantified on anteroposterior (AP) spine DXA and the femoral neck region of hip DXA.
RESULTS: When QCT parameters were linearly regressed against body height and weight, only the relationships with weight were found to be statistically significant. Except for cortical BMD at the femoral neck, all BMD and geometric parameters measured from both DXA and QCT showed statistically significant associations with body weight (r2 = 0.4, 0.0001 < P < 0.02). The strongest associations with weight were found for DXA Neck (DXA_NECK) and DXA lumbar spine (DXA_LSP) (r2 = 0.4, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The relationship of DXA BMD is stronger than QCT BMD with body weight and it encompasses the response of both bone size and density to increasing body mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875335     DOI: 10.1080/02841850600690363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

Review 1.  Body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  A Andreoli; G Scalzo; S Masala; U Tarantino; G Guglielmi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Changes in femur neck bone density in US adults between 1988-1994 and 2005-2008: demographic patterns and possible determinants.

Authors:  A C Looker; L J Melton; L G Borrud; J A Shepherd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Soda intake and osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal American-Indian women.

Authors:  Joy D Supplee; Glen E Duncan; Barbara Bruemmer; Jack Goldberg; Yang Wen; Jeffrey A Henderson
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Eric D Thorhauer; Joon Y Lee; William F Donaldson; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Relationship of circulating total homocysteine and C-reactive protein to trabecular bone in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Shilpa N Bhupathiraju; D Lee Alekel; Jeanne W Stewart; Laura N Hanson; Kristine M Shedd; Manju B Reddy; Kathy B Hanson; Marta D Van Loan; Ulrike Genschel; Kenneth J Koehler
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  Imaging of metabolic bone disease.

Authors:  Maria Mattera; Alfonso Reginelli; Silvia Bartollino; Claudio Russo; Antonio Barile; Domenico Albano; Giovanni Mauri; Carmelo Messina; Salvatore Cappabianca; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-01-19

7.  Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Fat Content Evaluation by Dixon Chemical Shift MRI.

Authors:  Fei-Xia Chang; Dun-Hui Fan; Gang Huang; Jian-Hong He
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-08-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.