Literature DB >> 21617166

What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions?

Stephanie L Taylor1, Sydney Dy, Robbie Foy, Susanne Hempel, Kathryn M McDonald, John Ovretveit, Peter J Pronovost, Lisa V Rubenstein, Robert M Wachter, Paul G Shekelle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differences in contexts (eg, policies, healthcare organisation characteristics) may explain variations in the effects of patient safety practice (PSP) implementations. However, knowledge of which contextual features are important determinants of PSP effectiveness is limited and consensus is lacking on a taxonomy of which contexts matter.
METHODS: Iterative, formal discussions were held with a 22-member technical expert panel composed of experts or leaders in patient safety, healthcare systems, and methods. First, potentially important contextual features were identified, focusing on five PSPs. Then, two surveys were conducted to determine the context likely to influence PSP implementations.
RESULTS: The panel reached a consensus on a taxonomy of four broad domains of contextual features important for PSP implementations: safety culture, teamwork and leadership involvement; structural organisational characteristics (eg, size, organisational complexity or financial status); external factors (eg, financial or performance incentives or PSP regulations); and availability of implementation and management tools (eg, training organisational incentives). Panelists also tended to rate specific patient safety culture, teamwork and leadership contexts as high priority for assessing their effects on PSP implementations, but tended to rate specific organisational characteristic contexts as high priority only for use in PSP evaluations. Panelists appeared split on whether specific external factors and implementation/management tools were important for assessment or only description.
CONCLUSION: This work can guide research commissioners and evaluators on the contextual features of PSP implementations that are important to report or evaluate. It represents a first step towards developing guidelines on contexts in PSP implementation evaluations. However, the science of context measurement needs maturing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21617166     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  45 in total

Review 1.  Consensus-based recommendations for research priorities related to interventions to safeguard patient safety in the crowded emergency department.

Authors:  Christopher Fee; Kendall Hall; J Bradley Morrison; Robert Stephens; Karen Cosby; Rollin Terry J Fairbanks; Barbara Youngberg; Gail Lenehan; Jameel Abualenain; Kevin O'Connor; Robert Wears
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Team Learning for Healthcare Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Narine Manukyan; Margaret J Eppstein; Jeffrey D Horbar
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Campaigning for safety.

Authors:  Alan F Merry
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

4.  SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process.

Authors:  Greg Ogrinc; Louise Davies; Daisy Goodman; Paul Batalden; Frank Davidoff; David Stevens
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015

5.  Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change.

Authors:  Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Debra L Scammon; Norman J Waitzman; Peter F Cronholm; Jacqueline R Halladay; David L Driscoll; Leif I Solberg; Clarissa Hsu; Ming Tai-Seale; Vanessa Hiratsuka; Sarah C Shih; Michael D Fetters; Christopher G Wise; Jeffrey A Alexander; Diane Hauser; Carmit K McMullen; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Manasi A Tirodkar; Laura Schmidt; Katrina E Donahue; Michael L Parchman; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Promoters and Barriers to Implementation of Tracheal Intubation Airway Safety Bundle: A Mixed-Method Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine Finn Davis; Natalie Napolitano; Simon Li; Hayley Buffman; Kyle Rehder; Matthew Pinto; Sholeen Nett; J Dean Jarvis; Pradip Kamat; Ronald C Sanders; David A Turner; Janice E Sullivan; Kris Bysani; Anthony Lee; Margaret Parker; Michelle Adu-Darko; John Giuliano; Katherine Biagas; Vinay Nadkarni; Akira Nishisaki
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  How to Sustain Change and Support Continuous Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Samuel A Silver; Rory McQuillan; Ziv Harel; Adam V Weizman; Alison Thomas; Gihad Nesrallah; Chaim M Bell; Christopher T Chan; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  System-related interventions to reduce diagnostic errors: a narrative review.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Mark L Graber; Stephanie M Kissam; Asta V Sorensen; Nancy F Lenfestey; Elizabeth M Tant; Kerm Henriksen; Kenneth A LaBresh
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Patient safety ward round checklist via an electronic app: implications for harm prevention.

Authors:  C Keller; S Arsenault; M Lamothe; S R Bostan; R O'Donnell; J Harbison; C P Doherty
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Effectiveness of an electronic health record-based intervention to improve follow-up of abnormal pathology results: a retrospective record analysis.

Authors:  Archana Laxmisan; Dean F Sittig; Kenneth Pietz; Donna Espadas; Bhuvaneswari Krishnan; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.