Literature DB >> 26517437

SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process.

Greg Ogrinc1, Louise Davies2, Daisy Goodman3, Paul Batalden4, Frank Davidoff5, David Stevens6.   

Abstract

Since the publication of Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015, using 1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group; 2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts; and 3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26517437      PMCID: PMC4625997          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/15-141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  19 in total

1.  General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education.

Authors:  Paul Batalden; David Leach; Susan Swing; Hubert Dreyfus; Stuart Dreyfus
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project.

Authors:  F Davidoff; P Batalden
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-10

3.  Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  The ethics of using QI methods to improve health care quality and safety.

Authors:  Mary Ann Baily; Melissa Bottrell; Joanne Lynn; Bruce Jennings
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 5.  The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study.

Authors:  Victoria Howell; Amanda Eva Schwartz; James Daniel O'Leary; Conor Mc Donnell
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  SQUIRE and the evolving science of healthcare improvement.

Authors:  David P Stevens
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 7.  How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types.

Authors:  Margareth Crisóstomo Portela; Peter J Pronovost; Thomas Woodcock; Pam Carter; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Demystifying theory and its use in improvement.

Authors:  Frank Davidoff; Mary Dixon-Woods; Laura Leviton; Susan Michie
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  The SQUIRE Guidelines: an evaluation from the field, 5 years post release.

Authors:  Louise Davies; Paul Batalden; Frank Davidoff; David Stevens; Greg Ogrinc
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: user road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0.

Authors:  Louise Davies; Kyla Z Donnelly; Daisy J Goodman; Greg Ogrinc
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prospective Investigation of the Operating Room Time-Out Process.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Catherine M Bulka; Jonathan P Wanderer; Brian S Rothman; Warren S Sandberg; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Utilisation of the 2019 IWGDF diabetic foot infection guidelines to benchmark practice and improve the delivery of care in persons with diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  Matthew Malone; Adriaan Erasmus; Saskia Schwarzer; Namson S Lau; Mehtab Ahmad; Hugh G Dickson
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Impact of a multifaceted and multidisciplinary intervention on pain, agitation and delirium management in an intensive care unit: an experience of a Canadian community hospital in conducting a quality improvement project.

Authors:  Zechen Ma; Mercedes Camargo Penuela; Madelyn Law; Divya Joshi; Han-Oh Chung; Joyce Nga Hei Lam; Jennifer Ly Tsang
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-12

4.  Evaluation of Sexual Harassment Policies at Medical Institutions to Understand Attention to Harassment of Physicians by Patients.

Authors:  Gabriela Reed; Sarah R Ahmad; Elaine C Khoong; Kristan Olazo; Reshma Jagsi; Christina Mangurian; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

5.  Quality Initiative to Improve time to Antibiotics for Febrile Pediatric Patients with Potential Neutropenia.

Authors:  Kathy Monroe; Clay T Cohen; Kimberly Whelan; Amber King; Lisa Maloney; Janet Deason; John Charles Nichols; Gregory K Friedman; Matthew Kutny; Leslie Hayes
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2018-08-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.