Literature DB >> 29110186

Patient safety ward round checklist via an electronic app: implications for harm prevention.

C Keller1, S Arsenault1, M Lamothe1, S R Bostan1, R O'Donnell2, J Harbison2, C P Doherty3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient safety is a value at the core of modern healthcare. Though awareness in the medical community is growing, implementing systematic approaches similar to those used in other high reliability industries is proving difficult. The aim of this research was twofold, to establish a baseline for patient safety practices on routine ward rounds and to test the feasibility of implementing an electronic patient safety checklist application.
METHODS: Two research teams were formed; one auditing a medical team to establish a procedural baseline of "usual care" practice and an intervention team concurrently was enforcing the implementation of the checklist. The checklist was comprised of eight standard clinical practice items. The program was conducted over a 2-week period and 1 month later, a retrospective analysis of patient charts was conducted using a global trigger tool to determine variance between the experimental groups. Finally, feedback from the physician participants was considered.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated a statistically significant difference on five variables of a total of 16. The auditing team observed low adherence to patient identification (0.0%), hand decontamination (5.5%), and presence of nurse on ward rounds (6.8%). Physician feedback was generally positive.
CONCLUSIONS: The baseline audit demonstrated significant practice bias on daily ward rounds which tended to omit several key-proven patient safety practices such as prompting hand decontamination and obtaining up to date reports from nursing staff. Results of the intervention arm demonstrate the feasibility of using the Checklist App on daily ward rounds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Global trigger tool; Harm; Medical error; Patient safety; Population and developmental health

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29110186     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-017-1687-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  12 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Defining and measuring patient safety.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; David A Thompson; Christine G Holzmueller; Lisa H Lubomski; Laura L Morlock
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  The effects of safety checklists in medicine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ø Thomassen; A Storesund; E Søfteland; G Brattebø
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions?

Authors:  Stephanie L Taylor; Sydney Dy; Robbie Foy; Susanne Hempel; Kathryn M McDonald; John Ovretveit; Peter J Pronovost; Lisa V Rubenstein; Robert M Wachter; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 5.  Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices.

Authors:  K G Shojania; B W Duncan; K M McDonald; R M Wachter; A J Markowitz
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ)       Date:  2001

6.  Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care.

Authors:  Christopher P Landrigan; Gareth J Parry; Catherine B Bones; Andrew D Hackbarth; Donald A Goldmann; Paul J Sharek
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured.

Authors:  David C Classen; Roger Resar; Frances Griffin; Frank Federico; Terri Frankel; Nancy Kimmel; John C Whittington; Allan Frankel; Andrew Seger; Brent C James
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Use of incident reports by physicians and nurses to document medical errors in pediatric patients.

Authors:  James A Taylor; Dena Brownstein; Dimitri A Christakis; Susan Blackburn; Thomas P Strandjord; Eileen J Klein; Jaleh Shafii
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I.

Authors:  T A Brennan; L L Leape; N M Laird; L Hebert; A R Localio; A G Lawthers; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada.

Authors:  G Ross Baker; Peter G Norton; Virginia Flintoft; Régis Blais; Adalsteinn Brown; Jafna Cox; Ed Etchells; William A Ghali; Philip Hébert; Sumit R Majumdar; Maeve O'Beirne; Luz Palacios-Derflingher; Robert J Reid; Sam Sheps; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  Simulated ward round training in the medical curriculum Munich.

Authors:  Christian Lottspeich; Leah T Braun; Martin R Fischer; Ralf Schmidmaier
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.