Literature DB >> 21607679

Bone cross-sectional geometry in male runners, gymnasts, swimmers and non-athletic controls: a hip-structural analysis study.

Karen Hind1, Lisa Gannon, Emma Whatley, Carlton Cooke, John Truscott.   

Abstract

Loading of the skeleton is important for the development of a functionally and mechanically appropriate bone structure, and can be achieved through impact exercise. Proximal femur cross-sectional geometry was assessed in the male athletes (n = 55) representing gymnastics, endurance running and swimming, and non-athletic controls (n = 22). Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (iDXA, GE Healthcare, UK) measurements of the total body (for body composition) and the left proximal femur were obtained. Advanced hip structural analysis (AHA) was utilised to determine the areal bone mineral density (aBMD), hip axis length (HAL), cross-sectional area (CSA), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) and the femoral strength index (FSI). Gymnasts and runners had greater age, height and weight adjusted aBMD than in swimmers and controls (p < 0.05). Gymnasts and runners had greater resistance to axial loads (CSA) and the runners had increased resistance against bending forces (CSMI) compared to swimmers and controls (p < 0.01). Controls had a lower FSI compared to gymnasts and runners (1.4 vs. 1.8 and 2.1, respectively, p < 0.005). Lean mass correlated with aBMD, CSA and FSI (r = 0.365-0.457, p < 0.01), particularly in controls (r = 0.657-0.759, p < 0.005). Skeletal loading through the gymnastics and running appears to confer a superior bone geometrical advantage in the young adult men. The importance of lean body mass appears to be of particular significance for non-athletes. Further characterisation of the bone structural advantages associated with different sports would be of value to inform the strategies directed at maximising bone strength and thus, preventing fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21607679     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2008-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  34 in total

Review 1.  From mechanostat theory to development of the "Functional Muscle-Bone-Unit".

Authors:  E Schoenau
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.041

2.  Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling.

Authors:  L E Lanyon; C T Rubin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Varying contributions of growth and ageing to racial and sex differences in femoral neck structure and strength in old age.

Authors:  Xiao-Fang Wang; Yunbo Duan; Thomas J Beck; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  The fracture risk index and bone mineral density as predictors of vertebral structural failure.

Authors:  Yunbo Duan; François Duboeuf; Françoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Femoral bone structural geometry adapts to mechanical loading and is influenced by sex steroids: the Penn State Young Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Moira A Petit; Thomas J Beck; Hung-Mo Lin; Christy Bentley; Richard S Legro; Tom Lloyd
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Comparison of DXA hip structural analysis with volumetric QCT.

Authors:  Sven Prevrhal; John A Shepherd; Kenneth G Faulkner; Ken W Gaither; Dennis M Black; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  Skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage: results from tibial loading studies in rats.

Authors:  M R Forwood; C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Physical activity and femoral neck bone strength during childhood: the Iowa Bone Development Study.

Authors:  Kathleen F Janz; Julie M Eichenberger Gilmore; Steven M Levy; Elena M Letuchy; Trudy L Burns; Thomas J Beck
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  The bone response to non-weight-bearing exercise is sport-, site-, and sex-specific.

Authors:  Faidon Magkos; Stavros A Kavouras; Mary Yannakoulia; Melina Karipidou; Silia Sidossi; Labros S Sidossis
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.638

10.  Functional adaptation to mechanical loading in both cortical and cancellous bone is controlled locally and is confined to the loaded bones.

Authors:  Toshihiro Sugiyama; Joanna S Price; Lance E Lanyon
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  10 in total

1.  Bone: impact loading-nature's way to strengthen bone.

Authors:  Harri Sievänen
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Mechanical loading with or without weight-bearing activity: influence on bone strength index in elite female adolescent athletes engaged in water polo, gymnastics, and track-and-field.

Authors:  David A Greene; Geraldine A Naughton; Elizabeth Bradshaw; Mark Moresi; Gaele Ducher
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Bone mineral density, energy availability, and dietary restraint in collegiate cross-country runners and non-running controls.

Authors:  William P McCormack; Todd C Shoepe; Joseph LaBrie; Hawley C Almstedt
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Estradiol levels predict bone mineral density in male collegiate athletes: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Gary S Skrinar; Eva Medvedova; Madhusmita Misra; Karen K Miller
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 5.  Bone mechanotransduction may require augmentation in order to strengthen the senescent skeleton.

Authors:  Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross; Steven D Bain
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 10.895

6.  Weight loss in obese older adults increases serum sclerostin and impairs hip geometry but both are prevented by exercise training.

Authors:  Reina Armamento-Villareal; Corinn Sadler; Nicola Napoli; Krupa Shah; Suresh Chode; David R Sinacore; Clifford Qualls; Dennis T Villareal
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Is bone tissue really affected by swimming? A systematic review.

Authors:  Alejandro Gómez-Bruton; Alejandro Gónzalez-Agüero; Alba Gómez-Cabello; José A Casajús; Germán Vicente-Rodríguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sport Activity Load and Skeletomuscular Robustness in Elite Youth Athletes.

Authors:  Irina Kalabiska; Annamaria Zsakai; Dorina Annar; Robert M Malina; Tamas Szabo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  A review of the effect of swim training and nutrition on bone mineral density in female athletes.

Authors:  Namju Lee; Jongkyu Kim
Journal:  J Exerc Nutrition Biochem       Date:  2015-12-31

10.  Intensive terrestrial or marine locomotor strategies are associated with inter- and intra-limb bone functional adaptation in living female athletes.

Authors:  Alison A Macintosh; Jay T Stock
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 2.868

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.