BACKGROUND: Swimming, a sport practiced in hypogravity, has sometimes been associated with decreased bone mass. AIM: This systematic review aims to summarize and update present knowledge about the effects of swimming on bone mass, structure and metabolism in order to ascertain the effects of this sport on bone tissue. METHODS: A literature search was conducted up to April 2013. A total of 64 studies focusing on swimmers bone mass, structure and metabolism met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. RESULTS: It has been generally observed that swimmers present lower bone mineral density than athletes who practise high impact sports and similar values when compared to sedentary controls. However, swimmers have a higher bone turnover than controls resulting in a different structure which in turn results in higher resistance to fracture indexes. Nevertheless, swimming may become highly beneficial regarding bone mass in later stages of life. CONCLUSION: Swimming does not seem to negatively affect bone mass, although it may not be one of the best sports to be practised in order to increase this parameter, due to the hypogravity and lack of impact characteristic of this sport. Most of the studies included in this review showed similar bone mineral density values in swimmers and sedentary controls. However, swimmers present a higher bone turnover than sedentary controls that may result in a stronger structure and consequently in a stronger bone.
BACKGROUND: Swimming, a sport practiced in hypogravity, has sometimes been associated with decreased bone mass. AIM: This systematic review aims to summarize and update present knowledge about the effects of swimming on bone mass, structure and metabolism in order to ascertain the effects of this sport on bone tissue. METHODS: A literature search was conducted up to April 2013. A total of 64 studies focusing on swimmers bone mass, structure and metabolism met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. RESULTS: It has been generally observed that swimmers present lower bone mineral density than athletes who practise high impact sports and similar values when compared to sedentary controls. However, swimmers have a higher bone turnover than controls resulting in a different structure which in turn results in higher resistance to fracture indexes. Nevertheless, swimming may become highly beneficial regarding bone mass in later stages of life. CONCLUSION: Swimming does not seem to negatively affect bone mass, although it may not be one of the best sports to be practised in order to increase this parameter, due to the hypogravity and lack of impact characteristic of this sport. Most of the studies included in this review showed similar bone mineral density values in swimmers and sedentary controls. However, swimmers present a higher bone turnover than sedentary controls that may result in a stronger structure and consequently in a stronger bone.
Authors: Béatrice Ferry; Eric Lespessailles; Pierre Rochcongar; Martine Duclos; Daniel Courteix Journal: Joint Bone Spine Date: 2012-03-09 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Michael T C Liang; Sara B Arnaud; Charles R Steele; Patrick Hatch; Alexjandro Moreno Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2005-04-28 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: James N Roemmich; Pamela A Clark; Christos S Mantzoros; Cathy M Gurgol; Art Weltman; Alan D Rogol Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Samuel Vasikaran; Cyrus Cooper; Richard Eastell; Andrea Griesmacher; Howard A Morris; Tommaso Trenti; John A Kanis Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 3.694
Authors: Alejandro Gomez-Bruton; Jesús Montero-Marín; Alejandro González-Agüero; Javier García-Campayo; Luis A Moreno; Jose A Casajús; Germán Vicente-Rodríguez Journal: Sports Med Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: A Gómez-Bruton; A González-Agüero; A Gómez-Cabello; A Matute-Llorente; J A Casajús; G Vicente-Rodríguez Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Magni Mohr; Eva W Helge; Liljan F Petersen; Annika Lindenskov; Pál Weihe; Jann Mortensen; Niklas R Jørgensen; Peter Krustrup Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-08-09 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: A Gomez-Bruton; A Gonzalez-Aguero; A Matute-Llorente; G Lozano-Berges; A Gomez-Cabello; L A Moreno; J A Casajus; G Vicente-Rodríguez Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Joao Pedro Pinho; Arturo Forner-Cordero; Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira; Arnaldo Jose Hernandez; Egidio Lima Dorea; Bruno Mezencio; Liliam Takayama; Jackeline Couto Alvarenga; Julio Cerca Serrao; Alberto Carlos Amadio Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 3.316
Authors: Gilton de Jesus Gomes; Ricardo Junqueira Del Carlo; Márcia Ferreira da Silva; Daise Nunes Queiroz da Cunha; Edson da Silva; Karina Ana da Silva; Miguel Araújo Carneiro-Junior; Thales Nicolau Prímola-Gomes; Antônio José Natali Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 2.365