Literature DB >> 6520138

Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling.

L E Lanyon, C T Rubin.   

Abstract

Remodelling activity in the avian ulna was assessed under conditions of disuse alone, disuse with a superimposed continuous compressive load, and disuse interrupted by a short daily period of intermittent loading. The ulnar preparation consisted of the 110mm section of the bone shaft between two submetaphyseal osteotomies. Each end of the preparation was transfixed by a stainless steel pin and the shaft either protected from normal functional loading with the pins joined by external fixators, loaded continuously in compression by joining the pins with springs, or loaded intermittently in compression for a single 100s period per day by engaging the pins in an Instron machine. Similar loads (525 N) were used in both static and dynamic cases. The strains engendered were determined by strain gauges, and at their maximum around the bone's midshaft were -0.002. The intermittent load was applied at a frequency of 1 Hz as a ramped square wave, with a rate of change of strain during the ramp of 0.01 s-1. Peak strain at the midshaft of the ulna during wing flapping in the intact bone was recorded from bone bonded strain gauges in vivo as -0.0033 with a maximum rate of change of strain of 0.056 s-1. Examination of bone sections from the midpoint of the preparation after an 8 week period indicated that in both non-loaded and statically loaded bones there was an increase in both endosteal diameter and intra cortical porosity. These changes produced a decrease in cross sectional area which was similar in the two groups (-13%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6520138     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(84)90003-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  142 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphism of femoral neck cross-sectional bone geometry in athletes and non-athletes: a hip structural analysis study.

Authors:  Karen Hind; Lisa Gannon; Emma Whatley; Carlton Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Enhancing muscle force and femur compressive loads via feedback-controlled stimulation of paralyzed quadriceps in humans.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Andrew E Littmann; Shuo-Hsiu Chang; Colleen L McHenry; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Relationships among body weight, joint moments generated during functional activities, and hip bone mass in older adults.

Authors:  Man-Ying Wang; Sean P Flanagan; Joo-Eun Song; Gail A Greendale; George J Salem
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  How do tissues respond and adapt to stresses around a prosthesis? A primer on finite element stress analysis for orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Richard A Brand; Clark M Stanford; Colby C Swan
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

5.  Cultured embryonic bone shafts show osteogenic responses to mechanical loading.

Authors:  G Zaman; S L Dallas; L E Lanyon
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  A generalized procedure for predicting bone mass regulation by mechanical strain.

Authors:  M Viceconti; A Seireg
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  An in vivo assessment of muscular activity and the importance of electrical phenomena in bone remodelling.

Authors:  F McDonald; W J Houston
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 8.  Optimal mechanical environment of the healing bone fracture/osteotomy.

Authors:  Blaž Mavčič; Vane Antolič
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Body composition and skeletal health: too heavy? Too thin?

Authors:  Alexander Faje; Anne Klibanski
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 10.  Bone mineral density deficits and fractures in survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Carmen L Wilson; Kirsten K Ness
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.