Literature DB >> 21607567

Load-bearing capacity of artificially aged zirconia fixed dental prostheses with heterogeneous abutment supports.

Katia Sarafidou1, Meike Stiesch, Marc Philipp Dittmer, Daniela Jörn, Lothar Borchers, Philipp Kohorst.   

Abstract

Aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of artificial ageing and differential abutment support on the load-bearing capacity of zirconia posterior four-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Thirty-six FDPs were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and divided into three groups. Specimens in the first group were cemented onto tooth analogues with simulated periodontal resilience, in the second group onto a dental implant and a tooth analogue, but in the third group only onto implants. Half of the samples in each group underwent artificial ageing. Afterwards, all FDPs were loaded until bulk fracture in a universal testing machine. Load-displacement curves and forces at fracture were recorded and results were statistically analysed using ANOVA. Load-bearing capacities within the different test groups averaged as follows (control/artificially aged): tooth-tooth supported (2,009/1,751 N), tooth-implant supported (2,144/1,935 N) and implant-implant supported (2,689/2,484 N). Artificial ageing as well as differential abutment support did have a significant influence on the fracture strength of the zirconia FDPs. Implant-retained prostheses demonstrated the highest load-bearing capacity, while resilient support was demonstrated to be unfavourable. According to these in vitro results, zirconia four-unit prostheses may be promising for application in posterior areas with all three support scenarios (implant-assisted, tooth-retained, or implant-tooth-interconnected prostheses). However, the restorations' mechanical strength may expected to be significantly influenced in situ by ageing of the material on the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21607567     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0569-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  30 in total

1.  Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography.

Authors:  Virgilio F Ferrario; Chiarella Sforza; Gianfranco Zanotti; Gianluca M Tartaglia
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids.

Authors:  D S Palmer; M T Barco; E J Billy
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  What future for zirconia as a biomaterial?

Authors:  Jérôme Chevalier
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Use of abutment-teeth vs. dental implants to support all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: an in-vitro study on fracture strength.

Authors:  Per Vult von Steyern; Yuji Kokubo; Krister Nilner
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  2005

5.  In vitro evaluation of low-temperature aging effects and finishing procedures on the flexural strength and structural stability of Y-TZP dental ceramics.

Authors:  Harry P Papanagiotou; Steven M Morgano; Russell A Giordano; Richard Pober
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  ZrO2 three-unit fixed partial dentures: comparison of failure load before and after exposure to a mastication simulator.

Authors:  W Att; M Grigoriadou; J R Strub
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli.

Authors:  S S Scherrer; W G de Rijk
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Influence of the supporting structure on stress distribution in all-ceramic FPDs.

Authors:  Marc Philipp Dittmer; Philipp Kohorst; Lothar Borchers; Meike Stiesch
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

9.  Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures with different computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) fabricated framework materials.

Authors:  Florian Beuer; Bastian Steff; Michael Naumann; John A Sorensen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.612

10.  Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.

Authors:  Carola Kolbeck; Michael Behr; Martin Rosentritt; Gerhard Handel
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  3 in total

1.  Tooth-implant-supported posterior fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks: 3-year clinical result.

Authors:  Florian Beuer; Caroline Sachs; Julian Groesser; Jan-Frederik Gueth; Michael Stimmelmayr
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Influence of the supporting die structures on the fracture strength of all-ceramic materials.

Authors:  Munir Tolga Yucel; Isa Yondem; Filiz Aykent; Oğuz Eraslan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns.

Authors:  Sami Aldhuwayhi; Muhammad Syafiq Alauddin; Nicolas Martin
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.329

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.