Literature DB >> 20234896

Influence of the supporting structure on stress distribution in all-ceramic FPDs.

Marc Philipp Dittmer1, Philipp Kohorst, Lothar Borchers, Meike Stiesch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the design and material composition of the supporting structure of a zirconia four-unit fixed partial denture (FPD) on stress distribution during in vitro loading.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional finite element model of an all-ceramic FPD ranging from the maxillary left first premolar to second molar was constructed. The supporting structures were modeled in four versions. In version 1, the socket and rigidly fixed abutment teeth were made of a nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr) alloy. Version 2 was similar to version 1 but abutment teeth were embedded resiliently. Version 3 replaced the Ni-Cr alloy with polyurethane as the material for the socket and abutment teeth. Version 4 was designed according to the in vivo situation with a simulated periodontal ligament, the socket consisting of spongiosa, and abutment teeth composed of dentin. An occlusal force of 1,630 N was distributed over the marginal ridges of the pontics.
RESULTS: The highest tensile stresses were located within the framework underneath the connector between the second premolar and first molar and ranged between 289 and 633 MPa, according to the model version. The resilient support of abutment teeth resulted in considerably higher maximum tensile stresses.
CONCLUSIONS: The choice of material for abutment teeth and the socket, as well as the type of tooth support, significantly influence stresses generated in FPDs during in vitro load tests. To achieve realistic results, FPDs should be supported by resiliently embedded abutment teeth made of a moderately rigid material (eg, polyurethane). In clinical practice, risk of failure is likely to rise with an increasing resilience of the abutment teeth if occlusal contacts are directed over the pontic/connector region rather than being spread over the retainers. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:63-68.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20234896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  5 in total

1.  Tooth-implant-supported posterior fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks: 3-year clinical result.

Authors:  Florian Beuer; Caroline Sachs; Julian Groesser; Jan-Frederik Gueth; Michael Stimmelmayr
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Influence of the supporting die structures on the fracture strength of all-ceramic materials.

Authors:  Munir Tolga Yucel; Isa Yondem; Filiz Aykent; Oğuz Eraslan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Load-bearing capacity of artificially aged zirconia fixed dental prostheses with heterogeneous abutment supports.

Authors:  Katia Sarafidou; Meike Stiesch; Marc Philipp Dittmer; Daniela Jörn; Lothar Borchers; Philipp Kohorst
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Vinicius Pavesi Fardin; Gerson Bonfante; Paulo G Coelho; Edmara T P Bergamo; Dimorvan Bordin; Malvin N Janal; Nick Tovar; Lukasz Witek; Estevam A Bonfante
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.144

5.  Load-bearing capacity of various CAD/CAM monolithic molar crowns under recommended occlusal thickness and reduced occlusal thickness conditions.

Authors:  Sulki Choi; Hyung-In Yoon; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.904

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.