Literature DB >> 25040454

Who is using long-acting reversible contraceptive methods? Findings from nine low-fertility countries.

Mieke C W Eeckhaut1, Megan M Sweeney, Jessica D Gipson.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods-IUDs and implants-are more effective than other reversible methods, yet are little used in the United States. Examining which U.S. women use LARC methods and how they differ from users in other low-fertility countries may help point the way toward increasing use.
METHODS: Data from married or cohabiting women participating in the National Survey of Family Growth (2008-2010) and in eight countries' Generations and Gender Programme surveys (2004-2010) were used in bivariate and multinomial logistic regression analyses examining LARC use within each setting.
RESULTS: The proportion of contraceptive use accounted for by LARC methods was generally greater in Europe (10-32%) than in the United States (10%) and Australia (7%). Compared with LARC use among comparable groups in other countries, use was particularly low among U.S. women who were married, were aged 40-44 or had had three or more children, yet was comparatively high among 18-24-year-olds. Among U.S. women, those aged 35-39 or 40-44 were more likely than 18-29-year-olds to rely on sterilization rather than on LARC methods (odds ratios, 3.0 and 10.7, respectively), those who had had three or more children were more likely to do so than were those who had had none or one (4.9), and women who had completed college were less likely than those who had not finished high school to do so (0.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Certain subgroups of U.S. women may benefit from the reversibility and effectiveness of LARC methods.
Copyright © 2014 by the Guttmacher Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25040454      PMCID: PMC4167921          DOI: 10.1363/46e1914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  25 in total

Review 1.  Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception.

Authors:  Catherine d'Arcangues
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Surgical sterilization in the United States: prevalence and characteristics, 1965-95.

Authors:  A Chandra
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  1998-06

3.  Young women's knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to long-acting reversible contraceptives.

Authors:  Erica L Spies; Natoshia M Askelson; Emma Gelman; Mary Losch
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

4.  Correlates of use of long-acting reversible methods of contraception among adolescent and young adult women.

Authors:  Amy K Whitaker; Annie M Dude; Amy Neustadt; Melissa L Gilliam
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008.

Authors:  William D Mosher; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2010-08

6.  U S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2010-06-18

7.  Improving contraceptive use in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost; Jacqueline E Darroch; Lisa Remez
Journal:  Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst)       Date:  2008

8.  Race, insurance status, and desire for tubal sterilization reversal.

Authors:  Sonya B Borrero; Matthew F Reeves; Eleanor B Schwarz; James E Bost; Mitchell D Creinin; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Intrauterine devices and reproductive health: American women in feast and famine.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Diana Cheng
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Forgettable contraception.

Authors:  David A Grimes
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  11 in total

1.  Internet-Based Information on Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents.

Authors:  Kari Harris; Kelly Byrd; Matt Engel; Kerri Weeks; Carolyn R Ahlers-Schmidt
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2015-12-07

2.  Funding policies and postabortion long-acting reversible contraception: results from a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Kirsten M J Thompson; Suzan Goodman; Carolyn L Westhoff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis)advantage in ten low-fertility countries.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Megan M Sweeney
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-21

4.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Placement, Continuation, and Removal Rates at an Inner-City Academic Medical Center Clinic.

Authors:  Aliye Runyan; Robert A Welch; Katherine J Kramer; Sarah Cortez; LeAnne J Roberts; Clementina Asamoah; Sarah Ottum; Jessica Sanders; Adib Shafi; Maurice-Andre Recanati
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Understanding the low uptake of long-acting reversible contraception by young women in Australia: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Cameryn C Garrett; Louise A Keogh; Anne Kavanagh; Jane Tomnay; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Contraceptive method use among women and its association with age, relationship status and duration: findings from the third British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3).

Authors:  Nicola Firman; Melissa J Palmer; Ian M Timæus; Kaye Wellings
Journal:  BMJ Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-05-25

7.  Women's Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Birth Timing and Birth Stopping.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Michael S Rendall; Polina Zvavitch
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2021-08-01

8.  The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008-2012.

Authors:  Amie L Bingham; Cameryn C Garrett; Christine Bayly; Anne M Kavanagh; Louise A Keogh; Rebecca J Bentley; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Uptake and Associated Factors among Women of Reproductive Age in Rural Kenya.

Authors:  Susan Ontiri; Gathari Ndirangu; Mark Kabue; Regien Biesma; Jelle Stekelenburg; Collins Ouma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Impact of a pay-for-performance scheme for long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) advice on contraceptive uptake and abortion in British primary care: An interrupted time series study.

Authors:  Richard Ma; Elizabeth Cecil; Alex Bottle; Rebecca French; Sonia Saxena
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.