Literature DB >> 21602503

MR imaging of multiple sclerosis.

Massimo Filippi1, Maria A Rocca.   

Abstract

Owing to its ability to depict the pathologic features of multiple sclerosis (MS) in exquisite detail, conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an established tool in the diagnosis of this disease and in monitoring its evolution. MR imaging has been formally included in the diagnostic work-up of patients who present with a clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of MS, and ad hoc diagnostic criteria have been proposed and are updated on a regular basis. In patients with established MS and in those participating in treatment trials, examinations performed with conventional MR pulse sequences provide objective measures to monitor disease activity and progression; however, they have a limited prognostic role. This has driven the application of newer MR imaging technologies, including higher-field-strength MR units, to estimate overall MS burden and mechanisms of recovery in patients at different stages of the disease. These techniques have allowed in vivo assessment of the heterogeneity of MS pathologic features in focal lesions and in normal-appearing tissues. More recently, some of the finer details of MS, including macrophage infiltration and abnormal iron deposition, have become quantifiable with MR imaging. The utility of these modern MR techniques in clinical trial monitoring and in the assessment of the individual patient's response to treatment still need to be evaluated. RSNA, 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21602503     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  72 in total

Review 1.  Multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alyssa Nylander; David A Hafler
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  PET/MRI of central nervous system: current status and future perspective.

Authors:  Zhen Lu Yang; Long Jiang Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Accuracy of postcontrast 3D turbo spin-echo MR sequence for the detection of enhanced inflammatory lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J Hodel; O Outteryck; E Ryo; A-L Bocher; O Lambert; D Chéchin; H Zéphir; A Lacour; J-P Pruvo; P Vermersch; X Leclerc
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Inversion recovery ultrashort echo time imaging of ultrashort T2 tissue components in ovine brain at 3 T: a sequential D2 O exchange study.

Authors:  Shu-Juan Fan; Yajun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Graeme M Bydder; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  MS lesions are better detected with 3D T1 gradient-echo than with 2D T1 spin-echo gadolinium-enhanced imaging at 3T.

Authors:  A Crombé; M Saranathan; A Ruet; M Durieux; E de Roquefeuil; J C Ouallet; B Brochet; V Dousset; T Tourdias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Neuroinflammatory imaging biomarkers: relevance to multiple sclerosis and its therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Tourdias; Vincent Dousset
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  The "central vein sign": is there a place for susceptibility weighted imaging in possible multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  Thomas Kau; Manuel Taschwer; Hannes Deutschmann; Martina Schönfelder; Jörg R Weber; Klaus A Hausegger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  MRI artefacts after Bonebridge implantation.

Authors:  C Steinmetz; I Mader; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; F Hassepass
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  PET imaging in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Daniele de Paula Faria; Sjef Copray; Carlos Buchpiguel; Rudi Dierckx; Erik de Vries
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Association of white matter hyperintensities with low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels.

Authors:  J M Prager; C Thomas; W J Ankenbrandt; J R Meyer; Y Gao; A Ragin; S Sidharthan; R Hutten; Y G Wu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.