Literature DB >> 21598087

Relation priming in established compounds: facilitation?

Thomas L Spalding1, Christina L Gagné.   

Abstract

Gagné and Spalding (Brain and Language, 90, 478-486, 2004, Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 20-35, 2009) have shown that the difficulty of interpreting an established compound (e.g., snowball) can be influenced by recent exposure to a compound with the same modifier and that this influence depends on the relation linking the constituents of the compound. For example, snowball (a ball made of snow) was processed more quickly following snowfort (a fort made of snow; same relation) than following snowshovel (a shovel for snow; different relation). In three experiments, we investigated the basis of this relation-priming effect. The results indicated that the relation-priming effect in established compounds is due to slower processing in the different-relation condition rather than to faster processing in the same-relation condition. These results pose a challenge for most models of compound-word processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21598087     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0112-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations.

Authors:  C L Gagné
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Lexical and relational influences on the processing of novel compounds.

Authors:  Christina L Gagné
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Compound fracture: the role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness.

Authors:  Gary Libben; Martha Gibson; Yeo Bom Yoon; Dominiek Sandra
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun-noun compounds.

Authors:  Christina L Gagné; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination?

Authors:  Gert Storms; Edward J Wisniewski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

6.  Sentential context and the interpretation of familiar open-compounds and novel modifier-noun phrases.

Authors:  Christina L Gagné; Thomas L Spalding; Melissa C Gorrie
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  An asymmetric effect of relational integration on recognition memory.

Authors:  Lara L Jones; Zachary Estes; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  CARIN theory reanalysis reanalyzed: a comment on Maguire, Devereux, Costello, and Cater (2007).

Authors:  Thomas L Spalding; Christina L Gagné
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: consequences for representation, processing, and impairment.

Authors:  G Libben
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  The time course of sense creation.

Authors:  R J Gerrig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  Conceptual relations compete during auditory and visual compound word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Christina L Gagné; Victor Kuperman; Thomas L Spalding; Benjamin V Tucker
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Victor Kuperman; Christina L Gagné; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

3.  Effects of Grammatical Structure of Compound Words on Word Recognition in Chinese.

Authors:  Lei Cui; Fengjiao Cong; Jue Wang; Wenxin Zhang; Yuwei Zheng; Jukka Hyönä
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-09

4.  Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations.

Authors:  Lara L Jones; Sabrina Golonka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.