Literature DB >> 26340846

Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy.

Daniel Schmidtke1, Victor Kuperman2, Christina L Gagné3, Thomas L Spalding3.   

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that the conceptual representation of a compound is based on a relational structure linking the compound's constituents. Existing accounts of the visual recognition of modifier-head or noun-noun compounds posit that the process involves the selection of a relational structure out of a set of competing relational structures associated with the same compound. In this article, we employ the information-theoretic metric of entropy to gauge relational competition and investigate its effect on the visual identification of established English compounds. The data from two lexical decision megastudies indicates that greater entropy (i.e., increased competition) in a set of conceptual relations associated with a compound is associated with longer lexical decision latencies. This finding indicates that there exists competition between potential meanings associated with the same complex word form. We provide empirical support for conceptual composition during compound word processing in a model that incorporates the effect of the integration of co-activated and competing relational information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conceptual combination; Entropy; Lexical decision; Morphology; Word recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26340846      PMCID: PMC6507423          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0926-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  Lexical and relational influences on the processing of novel compounds.

Authors:  Christina L Gagné
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun-noun compounds.

Authors:  Christina L Gagné; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological processing.

Authors:  Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín; Aleksandar Kostić; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-11

4.  Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Mark Pluymaekers; Mirjam Ernestus; Harald Baayen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  CARIN theory reanalysis reanalyzed: a comment on Maguire, Devereux, Costello, and Cater (2007).

Authors:  Thomas L Spalding; Christina L Gagné
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

7.  An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning.

Authors:  R Harald Baayen; Petar Milin; Dusica Filipović Đurđević; Peter Hendrix; Marco Marelli
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Relation priming in established compounds: facilitation?

Authors:  Thomas L Spalding; Christina L Gagné
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

9.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

10.  The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.

Authors:  Emmanuel Keuleers; Paula Lacey; Kathleen Rastle; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Christina L Gagné; Victor Kuperman; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Conceptual relations compete during auditory and visual compound word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Christina L Gagné; Victor Kuperman; Thomas L Spalding; Benjamin V Tucker
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Adult Age Differences in the Use of Conceptual Combination as an Associative Encoding Strategy.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Resh S Gupta; Ryan J Hubbard; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.