Literature DB >> 23287913

Influence of shell properties on high-frequency ultrasound imaging and drug delivery using polymer-shelled microbubbles.

Parag V Chitnis1, Sujeethraj Koppolu, Jonathan Mamou, Ceciel Chlon, Jeffrey A Ketterling.   

Abstract

This two-part study investigated shell rupture of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) under static overpressure conditions and the subharmonic component from UCAs subjected to 20-MHz tonebursts. Five different polylactide-shelled UCAs with shell-thickness-to-radius ratios (STRRs) of 7.5, 30, 40, 65, and 100 nm/¿m were subjected to static overpressure in a glycerol-filled test chamber. A video microscope imaged the UCAs as pressure varied from 2 to 330 kPa over 90 min. Images were postprocessed to obtain the pressure threshold for rupture and the diameter of individual microbubbles. Backscatter from individual UCAs was investigated by flowing a dilute UCA solution through a wall-less flow phantom placed at the geometric focus of a 20-MHz transducer. UCAs were subjected to 10- and 20-cycle tonebursts of acoustic pressures ranging from 0.3 to 2.3 MPa. A method based on singular-value decomposition (SVD) was employed to obtain a cumulative subharmonic score (SHS). Different UCA types exhibited distinctly different rupture thresholds that were linearly related to their STRR, but uncorrelated with UCA size. The rupture threshold for the UCAs with an STRR = 100 nm/μm was more than 4 times greater than the UCAs with an STRR = 7.5 nm/μm. The polymer-shelled UCAs produced substantial subharmonic response but the subharmonic response to 20- MHz excitation did not correlate with STRRs or UCA-rupture pressures. The 20-cycle excitation resulted in an SHS that was 2 to 3 times that of UCAs excited with 10-cycle tonebursts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23287913      PMCID: PMC3709566          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  40 in total

1.  Optical imaging of contrast agent microbubbles in an ultrasound field with a 100-MHz camera.

Authors:  N de Jong; P J Frinking; A Bouakaz; M Goorden; T Schourmans; X Jingping; F Mastik
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  The behaviour of individual contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  V Sboros; C M Moran; S D Pye; W N McDicken
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  High frequency nonlinear B-scan imaging of microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  David E Goertz; Emmanuel Cherin; Andrew Needles; Raffi Karshafian; Allison S Brown; Peter N Burns; F Stuart Foster
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.

Authors:  Azzdine Y Ammi; Robin O Cleveland; Jonathan Mamou; Grace I Wang; S Lori Bridal; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Buckling resistance of solid shell bubbles under ultrasound.

Authors:  Philippe Marmottant; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Catherine Quilliet
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A new ultrasound instrument for in vivo microimaging of mice.

Authors:  F S Foster; M Y Zhang; Y Q Zhou; G Liu; J Mehi; E Cherin; K A Harasiewicz; B G Starkoski; L Zan; D A Knapik; S L Adamson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  A new three-dimensional ultrasound microimaging technology for preclinical studies using a transgenic prostate cancer mouse model.

Authors:  Lauren A Wirtzfeld; Guojun Wu; Michael Bygrave; Yasuto Yamasaki; Hideki Sakai; Madeleine Moussa; Jonathan I Izawa; Dónal B Downey; Norman M Greenberg; Aaron Fenster; Jim W Xuan; James C Lacefield
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Oil-filled polymer microcapsules for ultrasound-mediated delivery of lipophilic drugs.

Authors:  Klazina Kooiman; Marcel R Böhmer; Marcia Emmer; Hendrik J Vos; Ceciel Chlon; William T Shi; Christopher S Hall; Suzanne H P M de Winter; Karin Schroën; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Annemieke van Wamel
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Effect of molecular weight, crystallinity, and hydrophobicity on the acoustic activation of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Ceciel Chlon; Constant Guédon; Bram Verhaagen; William T Shi; Christopher S Hall; Johan Lub; Marcel R Böhmer
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 6.988

10.  Ultrasound imaging of apoptosis in tumor response: novel preclinical monitoring of photodynamic therapy effects.

Authors:  Behzad Banihashemi; Roxana Vlad; Branislav Debeljevic; Anoja Giles; Michael C Kolios; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  8 in total

1.  Correlation of rupture dynamics to the nonlinear backscatter response from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sujeethraj Koppolu; Parag V Chitnis; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Mechanistic Insight into Sonoporation with Ultrasound-Stimulated Polymer Microbubbles.

Authors:  Brandon L Helfield; Xucai Chen; Bin Qin; Simon C Watkins; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Post-buckling of a pressured biopolymer spherical shell with the mode interaction.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; C Q Ru
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.704

Review 4.  Targeting of microbubbles: contrast agents for ultrasound molecular imaging.

Authors:  Shiying Wang; John A Hossack; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.121

5.  Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Rahul Nahire; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 6.  Microbubbles Stabilized by Protein Shell: From Pioneering Ultrasound Contrast Agents to Advanced Theranostic Systems.

Authors:  Polina G Rudakovskaya; Roman A Barmin; Pavel S Kuzmin; Elena P Fedotkina; Alexander N Sencha; Dmitry A Gorin
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.525

7.  Microbubble-Mediated Enhanced Delivery of Curcumin to Cervical Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Awaneesh Upadhyay; Bhrugu Yagnik; Priti Desai; Sameer V Dalvi
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-10-08

8.  Collapse pressure measurement of single hollow glass microsphere using single-beam acoustic tweezer.

Authors:  Jinhee Yoo; Hyunhee Kim; Yeonggeun Kim; Hae Gyun Lim; Hyung Ham Kim
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 7.491

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.