Literature DB >> 21580297

Guanidinium 4-amino-benzoate.

P S Pereira Silva1, M Ramos Silva, J A Paixão, A Matos Beja.   

Abstract

In the title compound, CH(6)N(3) (+)·C(7)H(6)NO(2) (-), the cation and anion lie on crystallographic mirror planes. The 4-amino-benzoate anion is almost in a planar conformation with a maximum deviation of 0.024 (2) Å for the N atom. The bond length in the deprotonated carboxyl group is inter-mediate between those of normal single and double Csp(2)=O bonds, indicating delocalization of the charge over both O atoms of the COO(-) group. In the crystal, N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds assemble the ions in layers propagating in the bc plane. This structure is very similar to that of guanidinium benzoate.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21580297      PMCID: PMC2983752          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681000396X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For a related structure, see: Pereira Silva et al. (2007 ▶). 4-Amino­benzoic acid has two known polymorphs, see: Gracin & Rasmuson (2004 ▶). For the potential applications of guanidine compounds in non-linear optics, see: Zyss et al. (1993 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

CH6N3C7H6NO2 M = 196.22 Orthorhombic, a = 14.9833 (4) Å b = 8.0602 (2) Å c = 8.4737 (2) Å V = 1023.36 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.33 × 0.19 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003 ▶) T min = 0.898, T max = 0.986 19879 measured reflections 1323 independent reflections 960 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.026

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.037 wR(F 2) = 0.109 S = 1.04 1323 reflections 85 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.13 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681000396X/ds2019sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681000396X/ds2019Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
CH6N3+·C7H6NO2F(000) = 416
Mr = 196.22Dx = 1.274 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PnmaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2nCell parameters from 8009 reflections
a = 14.9833 (4) Åθ = 2.8–27.5°
b = 8.0602 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 8.4737 (2) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1023.36 (4) Å3Irregular edge, light brown
Z = 40.33 × 0.19 × 0.15 mm
Bruker APEX2 CCD area-detector diffractometer1323 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube960 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.026
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.1°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)h = −18→19
Tmin = 0.898, Tmax = 0.986k = −10→9
19879 measured reflectionsl = −10→11
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.109H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.051P)2 + 0.1635P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1323 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
85 parametersΔρmax = 0.13 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.34385 (6)0.11290 (10)−0.04842 (10)0.0519 (3)
C10.43652 (10)0.25000.13590 (17)0.0390 (4)
C20.46854 (8)0.10235 (14)0.19926 (13)0.0462 (3)
H20.44900.00190.15770.055*
C30.52869 (8)0.10183 (16)0.32253 (14)0.0542 (3)
H30.54910.00150.36300.065*
C40.55904 (11)0.25000.3867 (2)0.0556 (5)
C50.37086 (10)0.25000.00390 (17)0.0391 (4)
N40.61881 (15)0.25000.5120 (3)0.0886 (7)
H40.6353 (13)0.149 (3)0.543 (2)0.106*
N10.25025 (7)0.10833 (13)0.66469 (14)0.0551 (3)
H1A0.2845 (9)0.1093 (16)0.7576 (18)0.066*
H1B0.2285 (9)0.016 (2)0.6258 (17)0.066*
N20.17018 (11)0.25000.47745 (19)0.0563 (4)
H2A0.1493 (9)0.147 (2)0.4470 (16)0.068*
C60.22330 (11)0.25000.6031 (2)0.0426 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0705 (6)0.0334 (4)0.0519 (5)−0.0031 (4)−0.0139 (4)−0.0006 (3)
C10.0415 (8)0.0398 (8)0.0358 (7)0.0000.0050 (6)0.000
C20.0489 (6)0.0455 (6)0.0442 (6)0.0021 (5)0.0014 (5)0.0013 (5)
C30.0530 (7)0.0627 (8)0.0467 (7)0.0100 (6)−0.0004 (5)0.0089 (6)
C40.0443 (9)0.0813 (14)0.0411 (9)0.000−0.0018 (8)0.000
C50.0460 (8)0.0335 (8)0.0380 (8)0.0000.0035 (7)0.000
N40.0818 (13)0.1110 (19)0.0732 (13)0.000−0.0344 (11)0.000
N10.0655 (7)0.0379 (6)0.0618 (7)0.0026 (5)−0.0206 (5)−0.0012 (5)
N20.0656 (10)0.0446 (9)0.0587 (9)0.000−0.0226 (8)0.000
C60.0419 (8)0.0398 (8)0.0460 (8)0.000−0.0036 (7)0.000
O1—C51.2575 (11)C4—N41.390 (3)
C1—C2i1.3910 (13)C5—O1i1.2575 (11)
C1—C21.3910 (13)N4—H40.89 (2)
C1—C51.490 (2)N1—C61.3188 (13)
C2—C31.3796 (17)N1—H1A0.940 (15)
C2—H20.9300N1—H1B0.875 (16)
C3—C41.3886 (15)N2—C61.329 (2)
C3—H30.9300N2—H2A0.923 (16)
C4—C3i1.3886 (15)C6—N1i1.3188 (13)
C2i—C1—C2117.65 (14)O1—C5—O1i122.98 (14)
C2i—C1—C5121.18 (7)O1—C5—C1118.50 (7)
C2—C1—C5121.18 (7)O1i—C5—C1118.50 (7)
C3—C2—C1121.34 (11)C4—N4—H4113.7 (13)
C3—C2—H2119.3C6—N1—H1A119.5 (8)
C1—C2—H2119.3C6—N1—H1B118.1 (10)
C2—C3—C4120.50 (12)H1A—N1—H1B121.7 (13)
C2—C3—H3119.7C6—N2—H2A115.3 (9)
C4—C3—H3119.7N1i—C6—N1119.95 (15)
C3—C4—C3i118.64 (15)N1i—C6—N2120.02 (8)
C3—C4—N4120.68 (8)N1—C6—N2120.02 (8)
C3i—C4—N4120.68 (8)
C2i—C1—C2—C31.2 (2)C2i—C1—C5—O1−179.70 (13)
C5—C1—C2—C3−179.36 (12)C2—C1—C5—O10.8 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.1 (2)C2i—C1—C5—O1i−0.8 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C3i−1.0 (3)C2—C1—C5—O1i179.70 (13)
C2—C3—C4—N4179.23 (16)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1ii0.940 (15)1.869 (16)2.8068 (14)175.4 (13)
N1—H1B···O1iii0.875 (16)2.107 (16)2.9032 (15)151.0 (13)
N2—H2A···O1iii0.923 (16)2.099 (16)2.9408 (8)151.1 (12)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i0.940 (15)1.869 (16)2.8068 (14)175.4 (13)
N1—H1B⋯O1ii0.875 (16)2.107 (16)2.9032 (15)151.0 (13)
N2—H2A⋯O1ii0.923 (16)2.099 (16)2.9408 (8)151.1 (12)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  Guanidinium 3-nitro-benzoate.

Authors:  Graham Smith; Urs D Wermuth
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-07-07

2.  Guanidinium 2-phenyl-acetate.

Authors:  Graham Smith; Urs D Wermuth
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-07-07

3.  Crystal structure of 4-(di-methyl-amino)-pyridinium 4-amino-benzoate dihydrate.

Authors:  A Thirunavukkarasu; A Silambarasan; R Mohan Kumar; P R Umarani; G Chakkaravarthi
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-01-01

4.  Synthesis, intermolecular interactions and biological activities of two new organic-inorganic hybrids C6H10N2,2Br and C6H10N2,2Cl·H2O.

Authors:  Intissar Hamdi; Intidhar Bkhairia; Andreas Roodt; Thierry Roisnel; Moncef Nasri; Houcine Naïli
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.036

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.