BACKGROUND: Stable circadian rhythm is important for both maternal and fetal health. This retrospective analysis of women in a semiconductor factory evaluated the effect of shift work exposure on childbearing and birth weight. METHODS: Records of 440 female employees (initial mean age: 28.4 years) including 111 mothers who had 158 live births during the period of observation (1997-2007) were reviewed. The data analyzed included maternal age, general health condition, highest educational level, life-style and occupational factors, as well as newborn gender, birth weight, birth order and gestational age. RESULTS: The childbearing rates of female workers on three different work schedules (consistent daytime work (CDW), intermittent (i-) or persistent (p-) rotating shift works (RSW)) were 32.1%, 20.0% and 25.4%, respectively (P=0.047). After controlling for potential confounding factors, childbearing rates among women with CDW exceeded those of shift workers (odds ratio (OR), 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0-3.0). The birth weights of newborns from mothers on the three work schedules (CDW, i-RSW and p-RSW) were significantly different (3271.7±395.4, 3251.3±460.9, and 2998.5±381.2 g, respectively (P<0.01). Newborns within the lightest birth weight quintile were significantly more likely to be born to mothers with exposure to p-RSW (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.1-16.8). CONCLUSIONS: Rotating shift work exposure was significantly associated with decreased childbearing and lighter birth weight in women working in this semiconductor manufacturing factory. Work schedules should be carefully planned for female employees who are pregnant or preparing for pregnancy. Prenatal evaluations for mothers with persistent day-night rotating shift work exposures are especially necessary.
BACKGROUND: Stable circadian rhythm is important for both maternal and fetal health. This retrospective analysis of women in a semiconductor factory evaluated the effect of shift work exposure on childbearing and birth weight. METHODS: Records of 440 female employees (initial mean age: 28.4 years) including 111 mothers who had 158 live births during the period of observation (1997-2007) were reviewed. The data analyzed included maternal age, general health condition, highest educational level, life-style and occupational factors, as well as newborn gender, birth weight, birth order and gestational age. RESULTS: The childbearing rates of female workers on three different work schedules (consistent daytime work (CDW), intermittent (i-) or persistent (p-) rotating shift works (RSW)) were 32.1%, 20.0% and 25.4%, respectively (P=0.047). After controlling for potential confounding factors, childbearing rates among women with CDW exceeded those of shift workers (odds ratio (OR), 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0-3.0). The birth weights of newborns from mothers on the three work schedules (CDW, i-RSW and p-RSW) were significantly different (3271.7±395.4, 3251.3±460.9, and 2998.5±381.2 g, respectively (P<0.01). Newborns within the lightest birth weight quintile were significantly more likely to be born to mothers with exposure to p-RSW (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.1-16.8). CONCLUSIONS: Rotating shift work exposure was significantly associated with decreased childbearing and lighter birth weight in women working in this semiconductor manufacturing factory. Work schedules should be carefully planned for female employees who are pregnant or preparing for pregnancy. Prenatal evaluations for mothers with persistent day-night rotating shift work exposures are especially necessary.
Authors: R C Elliott; J R Jones; D M McElvenny; M J Pennington; C Northage; T A Clegg; S D Clarke; J T Hodgson; J Osman Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: James M Tielsch; Joanne Katz; Ravilla D Thulasiraj; Christian L Coles; S Sheeladevi; Elizabeth L Yanik; Lakshmi Rahmathullah Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: See Ling Loy; Poh Hui Wee; Marjorelee T Colega; Yin Bun Cheung; Izzuddin M Aris; Jerry Kok Yen Chan; Keith M Godfrey; Peter D Gluckman; Kok Hian Tan; Lynette Pei-Chi Shek; Yap-Seng Chong; Padmapriya Natarajan; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Ngee Lek; Victor Samuel Rajadurai; Mya-Thway Tint; Yung Seng Lee; Mary Foong-Fong Chong; Fabian Yap Journal: J Nutr Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Keith T Palmer; Matteo Bonzini; E Clare Harris; Cathy Linaker; Jens Peter Bonde Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Rosaria Cappadona; Sara Puzzarini; Vanessa Farinelli; Piergiorgio Iannone; Alfredo De Giorgi; Emanuele Di Simone; Roberto Manfredini; Rosita Verteramo; Pantaleo Greco; María Aurora Rodríguez Borrego; Fabio Fabbian; Pablo Jesús López Soto Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.390