Literature DB >> 18038210

Socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy and abortion decision.

Laia Font-Ribera1, Glòria Pérez, Joaquín Salvador, Carme Borrell.   

Abstract

Pregnancy planning allows women to better control their life trajectory and contributes to the future child's health and development. Many studies that have analyzed socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy only took into account those pregnancies ending in births. Few of them that analyzed unintended pregnancy, including both induced abortion and births, and its socioeconomic determinants, concluded that unintended pregnancy is more frequent in young, poor, or unmarried women. These inequalities have been poorly studied in Europe, especially in the southern European context. The aim of the present study is to describe socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy and in abortion decision in Barcelona, Spain. The major findings are that unintended pregnancies accounted for 41% of total pregnancy and of these, 60% ended in abortion. From all pregnancies, the proportion of induced abortion reached 25.6%. Compared to women with university studies, those with primary education incomplete had more unintended pregnancies (OR=7.22). When facing an unintended pregnancy, women of lower socioeconomic position are more likely to choose induced abortion, although this is not the case among young or single women. This study reveals deep socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancies and abortion decision in Barcelona, Spain, where the birth rate is very low and the abortion rate is rising. Women in low socioeconomic positions have many more unintended pregnancies than better educated women. Except for young or single women, the lower the socioeconomic position, the higher the proportion of women who choose an induced abortion when facing an unintended pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18038210      PMCID: PMC2430141          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-007-9233-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  31 in total

1.  [Proposal for a social class measure. Working Group of the Spanish Society of Epidemiology and the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine].

Authors:  A Domingo-Salvany; E Regidor; J Alonso; C Alvarez-Dardet
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Relying on surveys to understand abortion behavior: some cautionary evidence.

Authors:  R Jagannathan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A history of the measurement of unintended pregnancies and births.

Authors:  A A Campbell; W D Mosher
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

4.  Abortion trends 1990-1999 in a Swiss region and determinants of abortion recurrence.

Authors:  V Addor; Françoise Narring; P-A Michaud
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2003-04-19       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Unintended pregnancy among the urban poor.

Authors:  Melanie Besculides; Fabienne Laraque
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Knowledge and willingness to use emergency contraception among low-income post-partum women.

Authors:  R Jackson; E B Schwarz; L Freedman; P Darney
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  Pharmacoeconomics of medical abortion: a review of cost in the United States, Europe and Asia.

Authors:  Amitasrigowri Murthy; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.889

8.  Women's life cycle and abortion decision in unintended pregnancies.

Authors:  S Sihvo; N Bajos; B Ducot; M Kaminski
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Linda A Bartlett; Cynthia J Berg; Holly B Shulman; Suzanne B Zane; Clarice A Green; Sara Whitehead; Hani K Atrash
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Safe abortion: WHO technical and policy guidance.

Authors:  R J Cook; B M Dickens; M Horga
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.561

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effect of rotating shift work on childbearing and birth weight: a study of women working in a semiconductor manufacturing factory.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Lin; Mei-Huei Chen; Chia-Jung Hsieh; Pau-Chung Chen
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Induced abortion in a Southern European region: examining inequalities between native and immigrant women.

Authors:  Elena Rodriguez-Alvarez; Luisa N Borrell; Yolanda González-Rábago; Unai Martín; Nerea Lanborena
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Trends in inequalities in induced abortion according to educational level among urban women.

Authors:  Gloria Pérez; Irene García-Subirats; Maica Rodríguez-Sanz; Elia Díez; Carme Borrell
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Clustering of characteristics associated with unplanned pregnancies: the generation R study.

Authors:  Clair A Enthoven; Hanan El Marroun; M Elisabeth Koopman-Verhoeff; Wilma Jansen; Mijke P Lambregtse-van den Berg; Frouke Sondeijker; Manon H J Hillegers; Hilmar H Bijma; Pauline W Jansen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-10-24       Impact factor: 4.135

5.  Decision making on unsafe abortions in Sri Lanka: a case-control study.

Authors:  Carukshi Arambepola; Lalini C Rajapaksa
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  The role of birthplace and educational attainment on induced abortion inequalities.

Authors:  Yolanda González-Rábago; Elena Rodriguez-Alvarez; Luisa N Borrell; Unai Martín
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Compliance to the recommended use of folic acid supplements for women in Sweden is higher among those under treatment for infertility than among fertile controls and is also related to socioeconomic status and lifestyle.

Authors:  Tiina Murto; Agneta Yngve; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Signe Altmäe; Andres Salumets; Kjell Wånggren; Anneli Stavreus-Evers
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy and associated factors in Britain: findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3).

Authors:  Kaye Wellings; Kyle G Jones; Catherine H Mercer; Clare Tanton; Soazig Clifton; Jessica Datta; Andrew J Copas; Bob Erens; Lorna J Gibson; Wendy Macdowall; Pam Sonnenberg; Andrew Phelps; Anne M Johnson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Is pregnancy planning associated with background characteristics and pregnancy-planning behavior?

Authors:  Jenny Stern; Lana Salih Joelsson; Tanja Tydén; Anna Berglund; Maria Ekstrand; Hanne Hegaard; Clara Aarts; Andreas Rosenblad; Margareta Larsson; Per Kristiansson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland.

Authors:  Heini Väisänen
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2015-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.