Literature DB >> 21570805

The reliability and variation of acetabular component anteversion measurements from cross-table lateral radiographs.

Ryan M Nunley1, James A Keeney, Jinjun Zhu, John C Clohisy, Robert L Barrack.   

Abstract

Although cross-table lateral (CL) radiographs are frequently used to assess acetabular component anteversion, the reliability of this method has not been established. We compared serial CL radiographs with computed tomography (CT) scans for 98 total hip arthroplasty patients (119 hips) undergoing surveillance of primary or revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular anteversion averaged 26.1° (range, -2° to 48.3°) on CL imaging and 28.8° (range, -7° to 54°) on CT scan. There was a strong correlation between anteversion determined from CT scans and serial CL images. However, variation on serial CL studies exceeded 10° for 20% of patients. Although CL imaging provides acceptable assessment of general component position, it has limited use for precise analysis in research, outcome reporting, or determination of cause of implant failure.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21570805     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph?

Authors:  Benjamin McArthur; Michael Cross; Christina Geatrakas; David Mayman; Bernard Ghelman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Posterior Hip Precautions Do Not Impact Early Recovery in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Matthew J Dietz; Adam E Klein; Brock A Lindsey; Stephen T Duncan; Jennifer M Eicher; Jonathan D Gillig; Brett R Smith; G Daxton Steele
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Cross table lateral radiography for measurement of acetabular cup version.

Authors:  Olav Reikeras; Ragnhild Beate Gunderson
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

Review 4.  Radiographic assessment of the cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  Jing-Xin Zhao; Xiu-Yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Ruo-Xiu Xiao; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

5.  How Reliable is the Acetabular Cup Position Assessment from Routine Radiographs?

Authors:  Jaime A Carvajal Alba; Heather K Vincent; Jagdeep S Sodhi; Loren L Latta; Hari K Parvataneni
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

6.  Validity, reliability and reproducibility of plain radiographic measurements after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sarwar S Mahmood; Bariq Al-Amiry; Sebastian S Mukka; Saida Baea; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Biplanar Low-Dose Radiography Is Accurate for Measuring Combined Anteversion After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christina I Esposito; Theodore T Miller; Joseph D Lipman; Kaitlin M Carroll; Douglas E Padgett; David J Mayman; Seth A Jerabek
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-02-05

8.  GeoGebra: A reliable and free software for measuring acetabular cup anteversion on digitalized plain radiographs.

Authors:  Vikas Bachhal; Gaurav Saini; Nipun Jindal; Radheshyam Sament; Ankit Dadra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-02-05

9.  Assessment of cup orientation in hip resurfacing: a comparison of TraumaCad and computed tomography.

Authors:  Daniel J Westacott; John McArthur; Richard J King; Pedro Foguet
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs.

Authors:  Yang Soo Park; Won Chul Shin; Sang Min Lee; Sang Ho Kwak; Jung Yun Bae; Kuen Tak Suh
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.