Literature DB >> 21570688

The effect of femoral tunnel placement on ACL graft orientation and length during in vivo knee flexion.

Ermias S Abebe1, Jong-Pil Kim, Gangadhar M Utturkar, Dean C Taylor, Charles E Spritzer, Claude T Moorman, William E Garrett, Louis E DeFrate.   

Abstract

Anatomically placed grafts are believed to more closely restore the function of the ACL. This study measured the effect of femoral tunnel placement on graft orientation and length during weight-bearing flexion. Both knees of twelve patients where the graft was placed near the anteroproximal border of the ACL and ten where the graft was placed near the center of the ACL were imaged using MR. These images were used to create 3D models of the reconstructed and intact contralateral knees, including the attachment sites of the native ACL and graft. Next, patients were imaged using biplanar fluoroscopy while performing a quasi-static lunge. The models were registered to the fluoroscopic images to reproduce in vivo knee motion. From the relative motion of the attachment sites on the models, the length and orientation of the graft and native ACL were measured. Grafts placed anteroproximally on the femur were longer and more vertical than the native ACL in both the sagittal and coronal planes, while anatomically placed grafts more closely mimicked ACL motion. In full extension, the grafts placed anteroproximally were 12.3±5.2° (mean and 95%CI) more vertical than the native ACL in the sagittal plane, whereas the grafts placed anatomically were 2.9±3.7° less vertical. Grafts placed anteroproximally were up to 6±2 mm longer than the native ACL, while the anatomically placed grafts were a maximum of 2±2 mm longer. In conclusion, grafts placed anatomically more closely restored native ACL length and orientation. As a result, anatomic grafts are more likely to restore intact knee kinematics.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21570688      PMCID: PMC3131226          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  46 in total

1.  Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study.

Authors:  M P Arnold; J Kooloos; A van Kampen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Evaluation and treatment of recurrent instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  C D Harner; J R Giffin; R C Dunteman; C C Annunziata; M J Friedman
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2001

3.  Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper.

Authors:  John C Loh; Yukihisa Fukuda; Eiichi Tsuda; Richard J Steadman; Freddie H Fu; Savio L Y Woo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Effect of the angle of the femoral and tibial tunnels in the coronal plane and incremental excision of the posterior cruciate ligament on tension of an anterior cruciate ligament graft: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Richard Simmons; Stephen M Howell; M L Hull
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Six degrees-of-freedom kinematics of ACL deficient knees during locomotion-compensatory mechanism.

Authors:  Li-Qun Zhang; Richard G Shiavi; Thomas J Limbird; Jay M Minorik
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Scott Tashman; David Collon; Kyle Anderson; Patricia Kolowich; William Anderst
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  E S Abebe; G M Utturkar; D C Taylor; C E Spritzer; J P Kim; C T Moorman; W E Garrett; L E DeFrate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The relationship between the angle of the tibial tunnel in the coronal plane and loss of flexion and anterior laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S M Howell; M E Gittins; J E Gottlieb; S M Traina; T M Zoellner
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knee during walking.

Authors:  Anastasios D Georgoulis; Anastasios Papadonikolakis; Christos D Papageorgiou; Argyris Mitsou; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts.

Authors:  Jason M Scopp; Louis E Jasper; Stephen M Belkoff; Claude T Moorman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  26 in total

1.  Impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparing the direct versus indirect femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  J P van der List; H A Zuiderbaan; D H Nawabi; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A modified quadrant method for describing the femoral tunnel aperture positions in ACL reconstruction using two-view plain radiographs.

Authors:  Masafumi Horie; Takeshi Muneta; Junya Yamazaki; Tomomasa Nakamura; Hideyuki Koga; Toshifumi Watanabe; Ichiro Sekiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Direct Visualization of Existing Footprint and Outside-In Drilling of the Femoral Tunnel in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Knee.

Authors:  E Grant Sutter; John A Anderson; William E Garrett
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-03-09

Review 5.  Review of evolution of tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Faizal Rayan; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Darryl Ramoutar; Sujith Konan; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 6.  The anatomy of the ACL and its importance in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  K Markatos; M K Kaseta; S N Lallos; D S Korres; N Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-09-22

7.  Effect of tibial tunnel diameter on femoral tunnel placement in transtibial single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Sanjeev Bhatia; Kyle Korth; Geoffrey S Van Thiel; Rachel M Frank; Deepti Gupta; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Effects of ACL graft placement on in vivo knee function and cartilage thickness distributions.

Authors:  Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  The effects of femoral graft placement on cartilage thickness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eziamaka C Okafor; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Margaret R Widmyer; Ermias S Abebe; Amber T Collins; Dean C Taylor; Charles E Spritzer; C T Moorman; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ha Sung Kim; Jong Keun Seon; Ah Reum Jo
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.