| Literature DB >> 21566796 |
Emilie Rederstorff1,2, Ahmed Fatimi2, Corinne Sinquin1, Jacqueline Ratiskol1, Christophe Merceron2, Claire Vinatier2, Pierre Weiss2, Sylvia Colliec-Jouault1.
Abstract
Polysaccharides are highly heat-sensitive macromolecules, so high temperature treatments are greatly destructive and cause considerable damage, such as a great decrease in both viscosity and molecular weight of the polymer. The technical feasibility of the production of exopolysaccharides by deep-sea bacteria Vibrio diabolicus and Alteromonas infernus was previously demonstrated using a bioproduct manufacturing process. The objective of this study was to determine which sterilization method, other than heat sterilization, was the most appropriate for these marine exopolysaccharides and was in accordance with bioprocess engineering requirements. Chemical sterilization using low-temperature ethylene oxide and a mixture of ionized gases (plasmas) was compared to the sterilization methods using gamma and beta radiations. The changes to both the physical and chemical properties of the sterilized exopolysaccharides were analyzed. The use of ethylene oxide can be recommended for the sterilization of polysaccharides as a weak effect on both rheological and structural properties was observed. This low-temperature gas sterilizing process is very efficient, giving a good Sterility Assurance Level (SAL), and is also well suited to large-scale compound manufacturing in the pharmaceutical industry.Entities:
Keywords: characterization; marine biotechnology; molecular weight distribution; polysaccharides; rheology; sterilization procedures
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21566796 PMCID: PMC3093254 DOI: 10.3390/md9020224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 6.085
Figure 1Repeating units of marine bacterial polysaccharides produced by Vibrio diabolicus (HE800 EPS) and Alteromonas infernus (GY785 EPS), respectively.
Figure 2Flow curves of the untreated (control) and treated EPS in water solutions at 25 °C. (a) HE800 EPS produced by Vibrio diabolicus (1.5% w/w); (b) GY785 EPS produced by Alteromonas infernus (1.25% w/w).
Figure 3Weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of the untreated (control) and treated EPSs. (a) HE800 EPS produced by Vibrio diabolicus; (b) GY785 EPS produced by Alteromonas infernus.
Figure 4Electroforetic migration of the untreated (control) and treated EPSs: 1: Control; 2: EO; 3: Control; 4: Gamma 15; 5: Gamma 25; 6: Control; 7: Beta 15; 8: Beta 25; 9: Control; 10: CP. (a) HE800 EPS produced by Vibrio diabolicus; (b) GY785 EPS produced by Alteromonas infernus.
Figure 5FTIR spectra of the untreated (control) and treated EPSs by gamma rays at a dose of 15 kGy: control () and gamma (). (a) HE800 EPS produced by Vibrio diabolicus; (b) GY785 EPSproduced by Alteromonas infernus.
Figure 6Cytotoxicity of the HE800 and GY785 EPSs treated by ethylene oxide. Cells were cultured during 24, 48 and 72 h without (control) or with 100 µg of treated EPS or with Actinomycin-D (control for cytotoxicity) per well. Values are mean ± SD of 4 experiments.