Literature DB >> 21565662

What do cigarette pack colors communicate to smokers in the U.S.?

Maansi Bansal-Travers1, Richard O'Connor, Brian V Fix, K Michael Cummings.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New legislation in the U.S. prohibits tobacco companies from labeling cigarette packs with terms such as light, mild, or low after June 2010. However, experience from countries that have removed these descriptors suggests that different terms, colors, or numbers communicating the same messages may replace them.
PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to examine how cigarette pack colors are perceived by smokers to correspond to different descriptive terms.
METHODS: Newspaper advertisements and CraigsList.org postings directed interested current smokers to a survey website. Eligible participants were shown an array of six cigarette packages (altered to remove all descriptive terms) and asked to link package images with their corresponding descriptive terms. Participants were then asked to identify which pack in the array they would choose if they were concerned with health, tar, nicotine, image, and taste.
RESULTS: A total of 193 participants completed the survey from February to March 2008 (data were analyzed from May 2008 through November 2010). Participants were more accurate in matching descriptors to pack images for Marlboro brand cigarettes than for unfamiliar Peter Jackson brand (sold in Australia). Smokers overwhelmingly chose the "whitest" pack if they were concerned about health, tar, and nicotine.
CONCLUSIONS: Smokers in the U.S. associate brand descriptors with colors. Further, white packaging appears to most influence perceptions of safety. Removal of descriptor terms but not the associated colors will be insufficient in eliminating misperceptions about the risks from smoking communicated to smokers through packaging.
Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21565662      PMCID: PMC3124844          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  13 in total

1.  The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  M Wakefield; C Morley; J K Horan; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact.

Authors:  R W Pollay; T Dewhirst
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents.

Authors:  K M Cummings; C P Morley; J K Horan; C Steger; N-R Leavell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  What was "light" and "mild" is now "smooth" and "fine": new labelling of Australian cigarettes.

Authors:  B King; R Borland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  How do different cigarette design features influence the standard tar yields of popular cigarette brands sold in different countries?

Authors:  R J O'Connor; D Hammond; A McNeill; B King; L T Kozlowski; G A Giovino; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth.

Authors:  David Hammond; Martin Dockrell; Deborah Arnott; Alex Lee; Ann McNeill
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  The pack as advertisement.

Authors:  J Slade
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Measuring the heaviness of smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; W Rickert; J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1989-07

Review 9.  The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products.

Authors:  Becky Freeman; Simon Chapman; Matthew Rimmer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 10.  Implications of the federal court order banning the terms "light" and "mild": what difference could it make?

Authors:  Stacey J Anderson; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  39 in total

1.  U.S. adult perceptions of the harmfulness of tobacco products: descriptive findings from the 2013-14 baseline wave 1 of the path study.

Authors:  Geoffrey T Fong; Tara Elton-Marshall; Pete Driezen; Annette R Kaufman; K Michael Cummings; Kelvin Choi; Jonathan Kwan; Amber Koblitz; Andrew Hyland; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Charles Carusi; Mary E Thompson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Awareness of FDA-mandated cigarette packaging changes among smokers of 'light' cigarettes.

Authors:  M Falcone; M Bansal-Travers; P M Sanborn; K Z Tang; A A Strasser
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-12-08

3.  Population use, sales, and design: a multidimensional assessment of "light" cigarettes in the United States, 2009.

Authors:  Ilan Behm; Natasha A Sokol; Ryan David Kennedy; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Use of imagery and text that could convey reduced harm in American Spirit advertisements.

Authors:  Meghan Bridgid Moran; John P Pierce; Caitlin Weiger; Mary C Cunningham; James D Sargent
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: promotion, packaging, price and place.

Authors:  Lisa Henriksen
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  US Smokers' Beliefs, Experiences and Perceptions of Different Cigarette Variants Before and After the FSPTCA Ban on Misleading Descriptors Such as "Light," "Mild," or "Low".

Authors:  Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Eric N Lindblom; Lin Li; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Richard J O'Connor; Tara Elton-Marshall; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Mary E Thompson; Timea R Partos
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 7.  Cigarette Filter Ventilation and its Relationship to Increasing Rates of Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Min-Ae Song; Neal L Benowitz; Micah Berman; Theodore M Brasky; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Catalin Marian; Richard O'Connor; Vaughan W Rees; Casper Woroszylo; Peter G Shields
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  "The Packaging Is Very Inviting and Makes Smokers Feel Like They're More Safe": The Meanings of Natural American Spirit Cigarette Pack Design to Adult Smokers.

Authors:  Anna E Epperson; Paige E Averett; Tiffany Blanchflower; Kyle R Gregory; Joseph G L Lee
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2019-01-04

9.  Adolescent and adult perceptions of traditional and novel smokeless tobacco products and packaging in rural Ohio.

Authors:  Sherry T Liu; Julianna M Nemeth; Elizabeth G Klein; Amy K Ferketich; Mei-Po Kwan; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Cigarette packaging and health warnings: the impact of plain packaging and message framing on young smokers.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Raymond S Niaura; W Douglas Evans; David Hammond; George Luta; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.