Literature DB >> 21564266

A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming.

David Reitter1, Frank Keller, Johanna D Moore.   

Abstract

The psycholinguistic literature has identified two syntactic adaptation effects in language production: rapidly decaying short-term priming and long-lasting adaptation. To explain both effects, we present an ACT-R model of syntactic priming based on a wide-coverage, lexicalized syntactic theory that explains priming as facilitation of lexical access. In this model, two well-established ACT-R mechanisms, base-level learning and spreading activation, account for long-term adaptation and short-term priming, respectively. Our model simulates incremental language production and in a series of modeling studies, we show that it accounts for (a) the inverse frequency interaction; (b) the absence of a decay in long-term priming; and (c) the cumulativity of long-term adaptation. The model also explains the lexical boost effect and the fact that it only applies to short-term priming. We also present corpus data that verify a prediction of the model, that is, that the lexical boost affects all lexical material, rather than just heads.
Copyright © 2011 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21564266     DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01165.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  26 in total

1.  Writing nonsense: the interaction between lexical and sublexical knowledge in the priming of nonword spelling.

Authors:  Daisy H Martin; Christopher Barry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Changes in task-extrinsic context do not affect the persistence of long-term cumulative structural priming.

Authors:  Timothy J Kutta; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-10-25

3.  Long and Short Term Cumulative Structural Priming Effects.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Timothy J Kutta; Jacqueline M Coyle
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Effects of Verb Overlap on Structural Priming in Dialogue: Implications for Syntactic Learning in Aphasia.

Authors:  Grace Man; Sarah Meehan; Nadine Martin; Holly Branigan; Jiyeon Lee
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Aligning sentence structures in dialogue: evidence from aphasia.

Authors:  Jiyeon Lee; Grace Man; Victor Ferreira; Nicholas Gruberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Structural priming as implicit learning: cumulative priming effects and individual differences.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Timothy J Kutta; John L Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

7.  Talker-specificity and adaptation in quantifier interpretation.

Authors:  Ilker Yildirim; Judith Degen; Michael K Tanenhaus; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Implicit learning of structure occurs in parallel with lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Kristen M Tooley; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Neal E Snider
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-01-23

10.  The role of explicit memory in syntactic persistence: Effects of lexical cueing and load on sentence memory and sentence production.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Sarah Bernolet; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.