Literature DB >> 26858511

Talker-specificity and adaptation in quantifier interpretation.

Ilker Yildirim1, Judith Degen2, Michael K Tanenhaus3, T Florian Jaeger4.   

Abstract

Linguistic meaning has long been recognized to be highly context-dependent. Quantifiers like many and some provide a particularly clear example of context-dependence. For example, the interpretation of quantifiers requires listeners to determine the relevant domain and scale. We focus on another type of context-dependence that quantifiers share with other lexical items: talker variability. Different talkers might use quantifiers with different interpretations in mind. We used a web-based crowdsourcing paradigm to study participants' expectations about the use of many and some based on recent exposure. We first established that the mapping of some and many onto quantities (candies in a bowl) is variable both within and between participants. We then examined whether and how listeners' expectations about quantifier use adapts with exposure to talkers who use quantifiers in different ways. The results demonstrate that listeners can adapt to talker-specific biases in both how often and with what intended meaning many and some are used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; pragmatics; quantifiers; semantics; talker-specificity

Year:  2016        PMID: 26858511      PMCID: PMC4742339          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  31 in total

1.  Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension.

Authors:  Holly P Branigan; Martin J Pickering; Janet F McLean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension.

Authors:  Manabu Arai; Roger P G van Gompel; Christoph Scheepers
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James L McClelland; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

5.  A context-sensitive representation of word meanings.

Authors:  H M Halff; A Ortony; R C Anderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-07

6.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.

Authors:  S E Brennan; H H Clark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Alex B Fine; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-01-30

Review 9.  Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science.

Authors:  Andy Clark
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 12.579

10.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis.

Authors:  Douglas Roland; Frederic Dick; Jeffrey L Elman
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  6 in total

1.  Incremental implicit learning of bundles of statistical patterns.

Authors:  Ting Qian; T Florian Jaeger; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-09-15

2.  Learning Additional Languages as Hierarchical Probabilistic Inference: Insights From First Language Processing.

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Alex B Fine; Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Learn       Date:  2016-03-14

Review 3.  Re-examining selective adaptation: Fatiguing feature detectors, or distributional learning?

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

4.  Readers generalize adaptation to newly-encountered dialectal structures to other unfamiliar structures.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Speaker-Specific Cues Influence Semantic Disambiguation.

Authors:  Catherine Davies; Vincent Porretta; Kremena Koleva; Ekaterini Klepousniotou
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2022-05-12

6.  The co-creation of meaningful action: bridging enaction and interactional sociology.

Authors:  Hanne De Jaegher; Anssi Peräkylä; Melisa Stevanovic
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.