Literature DB >> 21561101

Ligand Identification Scoring Algorithm (LISA).

Zheng Zheng1, Kenneth M Merz.   

Abstract

A central problem in de novo drug design is determining the binding affinity of a ligand with a receptor. A new scoring algorithm is presented that estimates the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex given a three-dimensional structure. The method, LISA (Ligand Identification Scoring Algorithm), uses an empirical scoring function to describe the binding free energy. Interaction terms have been designed to account for van der Waals (VDW) contacts, hydrogen bonding, desolvation effects, and metal chelation to model the dissociation equilibrium constants using a linear model. Atom types have been introduced to differentiate the parameters for VDW, H-bonding interactions, and metal chelation between different atom pairs. A training set of 492 protein-ligand complexes was selected for the fitting process. Different test sets have been examined to evaluate its ability to predict experimentally measured binding affinities. By comparing with other well-known scoring functions, the results show that LISA has advantages over many existing scoring functions in simulating protein-ligand binding affinity, especially metalloprotein-ligand binding affinity. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was also used in order to demonstrate that the energy terms in LISA are well designed and do not require extra cross terms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21561101      PMCID: PMC3124579          DOI: 10.1021/ci2000665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  34 in total

1.  SMall Molecule Growth 2001 (SMoG2001): an improved knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Alexey V Ishchenko; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Xueliang Fang; Yipin Lu; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Yipin Lu; Xueliang Fang; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

6.  The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Xueliang Fang; Yipin Lu; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  N-H...O, O-H...O, and C-H...O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes: strong and weak interactions in molecular recognition.

Authors:  Sanjay Sarkhel; Gautam R Desiraju
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-02-01
View more
  7 in total

1.  Prediction of trypsin/molecular fragment binding affinities by free energy decomposition and empirical scores.

Authors:  Mark L Benson; John C Faver; Melek N Ucisik; Danial S Dashti; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  TopologyNet: Topology based deep convolutional and multi-task neural networks for biomolecular property predictions.

Authors:  Zixuan Cang; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  AGL-Score: Algebraic Graph Learning Score for Protein-Ligand Binding Scoring, Ranking, Docking, and Screening.

Authors:  Duc Duy Nguyen; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Development of the knowledge-based and empirical combined scoring algorithm (KECSA) to score protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  The Movable Type Method Applied to Protein-Ligand Binding.

Authors:  Zheng Zheng; Melek N Ucisik; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Enrichment of chemical libraries docked to protein conformational ensembles and application to aldehyde dehydrogenase 2.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Cameron D Buchman; Liwei Li; Thomas D Hurley; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 7.  Empirical Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Virtual Screening: Applications, Critical Aspects, and Challenges.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Felipe S S Pereira; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.