Literature DB >> 24535920

The Movable Type Method Applied to Protein-Ligand Binding.

Zheng Zheng1, Melek N Ucisik1, Kenneth M Merz1.   

Abstract

Accurately computing the free energy for biological processes like protein folding or protein-ligand association remains a challenging problem. Both describing the complex intermolecular forces involved and sampling the requisite configuration space make understanding these processes innately difficult. Herein, we address the sampling problem using a novel methodology we term "movable type". Conceptually it can be understood by analogy with the evolution of printing and, hence, the name movable type. For example, a common approach to the study of protein-ligand complexation involves taking a database of intact drug-like molecules and exhaustively docking them into a binding pocket. This is reminiscent of early woodblock printing where each page had to be laboriously created prior to printing a book. However, printing evolved to an approach where a database of symbols (letters, numerals, etc.) was created and then assembled using a movable type system, which allowed for the creation of all possible combinations of symbols on a given page, thereby, revolutionizing the dissemination of knowledge. Our movable type (MT) method involves the identification of all atom pairs seen in protein-ligand complexes and then creating two databases: one with their associated pairwise distant dependent energies and another associated with the probability of how these pairs can combine in terms of bonds, angles, dihedrals and non-bonded interactions. Combining these two databases coupled with the principles of statistical mechanics allows us to accurately estimate binding free energies as well as the pose of a ligand in a receptor. This method, by its mathematical construction, samples all of configuration space of a selected region (the protein active site here) in one shot without resorting to brute force sampling schemes involving Monte Carlo, genetic algorithms or molecular dynamics simulations making the methodology extremely efficient. Importantly, this method explores the free energy surface eliminating the need to estimate the enthalpy and entropy components individually. Finally, low free energy structures can be obtained via a free energy minimization procedure yielding all low free energy poses on a given free energy surface. Besides revolutionizing the protein-ligand docking and scoring problem this approach can be utilized in a wide range of applications in computational biology which involve the computation of free energies for systems with extensive phase spaces including protein folding, protein-protein docking and protein design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knowledge-based scoring function; drug design; exhaustive sampling; protein ligand docking; protein-ligand binding free energy calculation

Year:  2013        PMID: 24535920      PMCID: PMC3924725          DOI: 10.1021/ct4005992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  42 in total

Review 1.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods.

Authors:  R D Taylor; P J Jewsbury; J W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Statistics-based model for basis set superposition error correction in large biomolecules.

Authors:  John C Faver; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical pKa Predictions.

Authors:  Mats H M Olsson; Chresten R Søndergaard; Michal Rostkowski; Jan H Jensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Method for computing protein binding affinity.

Authors:  Charles F F Karney; Jason E Ferrara; Stephan Brunner
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 7.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2007

8.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 9.  Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function.

Authors:  John L Klepeis; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Graphical analysis of pH-dependent properties of proteins predicted using PROPKA.

Authors:  Michał Rostkowski; Mats H M Olsson; Chresten R Søndergaard; Jan H Jensen
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2011-01-26
View more
  11 in total

1.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Binding Thermodynamics of Host-Guest Systems with SMIRNOFF99Frosst 1.0.5 from the Open Force Field Initiative.

Authors:  David R Slochower; Niel M Henriksen; Lee-Ping Wang; John D Chodera; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  TopologyNet: Topology based deep convolutional and multi-task neural networks for biomolecular property predictions.

Authors:  Zixuan Cang; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Juyong Lee; Florentina Tofoleanu; Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Ana Damjanović; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  KECSA-Movable Type Implicit Solvation Model (KMTISM).

Authors:  Zheng Zheng; Ting Wang; Pengfei Li; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Application of the Movable Type Free Energy Method to the Caspase-Inhibitor BindingAffinity Study.

Authors:  Song Xue; Hao Liu; Zheng Zheng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Recent Progress in Treating Protein-Ligand Interactions with Quantum-Mechanical Methods.

Authors:  Nusret Duygu Yilmazer; Martin Korth
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The critical role of QM/MM X-ray refinement and accurate tautomer/protomer determination in structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Oleg Y Borbulevych; Roger I Martin; Lance M Westerhoff
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.