Literature DB >> 14696187

N-H...O, O-H...O, and C-H...O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes: strong and weak interactions in molecular recognition.

Sanjay Sarkhel1, Gautam R Desiraju.   

Abstract

The characteristics of N-H...O, O-H...O, and C-H...O hydrogen bonds are examined in a group of 28 high-resolution crystal structures of protein-ligand complexes from the Protein Data Bank and compared with interactions found in small-molecule crystal structures from the Cambridge Structural Database. It is found that both strong and weak hydrogen bonds are involved in ligand binding. Because of the prevalence of multifurcation, the restrictive geometrical criteria set up for hydrogen bonds in small-molecule crystal structures may need to be relaxed in macromolecular structures. For example, there are definite deviations from linearity for the hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes. The formation of C-H...O hydrogen bonds is influenced by the activation of the C(alpha)-H atoms and by the flexibility of the side-chain atoms. In contrast to small-molecule structures, anticooperative geometries are common in the macromolecular structures studied here, and there is a gradual lengthening as the extent of furcation increases. C-H...O bonds formed by Gly, Phe, and Tyr residues are noteworthy. The numbers of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors agree with Lipinski's "rule of five" that predicts drug-like properties. Hydrogen bonds formed by water are also seen to be relevant in ligand binding. Ligand C-H...O(w) interactions are abundant when compared to N-H...O(w) and O-H...O(w). This suggests that ligands prefer to use their stronger hydrogen bond capabilities for use with the protein residues, leaving the weaker interactions to bind with water. In summary, the interplay between strong and weak interactions in ligand binding possibly leads to a satisfactory enthalpy-entropy balance. The implications of these results to crystallographic refinement and molecular dynamics software are discussed. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14696187     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  47 in total

1.  Minimizing frustration by folding in an aqueous environment.

Authors:  Carla Mattos; A Clay Clark
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 4.013

2.  An NMR strategy to detect conformational differences in a protein complexed with highly analogous inhibitors in solution.

Authors:  John D Persons; Shahid N Khan; Rieko Ishima
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Unconventional N-H…N Hydrogen Bonds Involving Proline Backbone Nitrogen in Protein Structures.

Authors:  R N V Krishna Deepak; Ramasubbu Sankararamakrishnan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The environment of amide groups in protein-ligand complexes: H-bonds and beyond.

Authors:  Simona Cotesta; Martin Stahl
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  High-resolution neutron crystallographic studies of the hydration of the coenzyme cob(II)alamin.

Authors:  Gerwald Jogl; Xiaoping Wang; Sax A Mason; Andrey Kovalevsky; Marat Mustyakimov; Zöe Fisher; Christina Hoffman; Christoph Kratky; Paul Langan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-05-19

6.  Probing the Hydrogen Bonding of the Ferrous-NO Heme Center of nNOS by Pulsed Electron Paramagnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Andrei V Astashkin; Li Chen; Bradley O Elmore; Deepak Kunwar; Yubin Miao; Huiying Li; Thomas L Poulos; Linda J Roman; Changjian Feng
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Ligand Identification Scoring Algorithm (LISA).

Authors:  Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Strong and weak hydrogen bonds in drug-DNA complexes: a statistical analysis.

Authors:  Sunil K Panigrahi; Gautam R Desiraju
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Effects of tryptophan residue fluorination on streptavidin stability and biotin-streptavidin interactions via molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Jarosław J Panek; Thomas R Ward; Aneta Jezierska; Marjana Novic
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 10.  A medicinal chemist's guide to molecular interactions.

Authors:  Caterina Bissantz; Bernd Kuhn; Martin Stahl
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.