Literature DB >> 21559776

Infertility treatment in a population-based sample: 2004-2005.

Sara E Simonsen1, Laurie Baksh, Joseph B Stanford.   

Abstract

To describe the characteristics of women seeking infertility treatment and the types of fertility treatment sought within a population-based sample. We analyzed data from the cross-sectional Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) of women with a live birth using data from seven states. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with infertility treatment utilization. Infertility treatment was reported by 10.5% of women who were trying to become pregnant. The most common treatment reported was fertility enhancing drugs (29%), followed by assisted reproductive technology including in vitro fertilization (21%), and artificial insemination together with fertility enhancing drugs (15%). Some women reported using other types of treatment (23%). The PRAMS data provide insights into the use of infertility treatment among women giving birth in the United States. Further research is needed to understand the true prevalence of infertility, factors that influence treatment choices, and the longitudinal impact of infertility treatment on outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21559776     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0809-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  25 in total

1.  Cumulative pregnancy probabilities among couples with subfertility: effects of varying treatments.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Courtney D Lynch; Sara E Simonsen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Laura A Schieve; Susan F Meikle; Cynthia Ferre; Herbert B Peterson; Gary Jeng; Lynne S Wilcox
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care.

Authors:  Jacky Boivin; Laura Bunting; John A Collins; Karl G Nygren
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Causes of infertility as predictors of subsequent cancer risk.

Authors:  Louise A Brinton; Carolyn L Westhoff; Bert Scoccia; Emmet J Lamb; Michelle D Althuis; Jerome E Mabie; Kamran S Moghissi
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states.

Authors:  B C Gilbert; H B Shulman; L A Fischer; M M Rogers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12

6.  Pregnancy chances on an IVF/ICSI waiting list: a national prospective cohort study.

Authors:  M J C Eijkemans; A M E Lintsen; C C Hunault; C A M Bouwmans; L Hakkaart; D D M Braat; J D F Habbema
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Gladys M Martinez; William D Mosher; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2005-12

8.  Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk for myocardial infarction. Evaluated from a risk factor model based on a prospective population study of women.

Authors:  E Dahlgren; P O Janson; S Johansson; L Lapidus; A Odén
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  [Assisted reproductive technoloy: indications and perceptions among couples presenting for infertility at Dakar University Hospital].

Authors:  P Moreira; C Fall; T Dieng; A Fall; A Diouf; J C Moreau
Journal:  Mali Med       Date:  2008

10.  Treatment-related and treatment-independent deliveries among infertile couples, a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  I Sundström; A Ildgruben; U Högberg
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  8 in total

1.  Use of assisted reproductive technology treatment as reported by mothers in comparison with registry data: the Upstate KIDS Study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Charlotte Druschel; Erin Bell; Judy E Stern; Barbara Luke; Alexander McLain; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Edwina Yeung
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Fertility Treatment, Use of in Vitro Fertilization, and Time to Live Birth Based on Initial Provider Type.

Authors:  Mandy W Boltz; Jessica N Sanders; Sara E Simonsen; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Infertility patients' knowledge of the effects of obesity on reproductive health outcomes.

Authors:  Eden R Cardozo; Lisa M Neff; Maureen E Brocks; Geraldine E Ekpo; Tanaka J Dune; Randall B Barnes; Erica E Marsh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Methods for a Retrospective Population-based and Clinic-based Subfertility Cohort Study: the Fertility Experiences Study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Jessica N Sanders; Sara E Simonsen; Ahmad Hammoud; Mark Gibson; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Methodology for establishing a population-based birth cohort focusing on couple fertility and children's development, the Upstate KIDS Study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; Erin M Bell; Christopher A Kus; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Alexander C McLain; Edwina Yeung; Elaine A Hills; Marie E Thoma; Charlotte M Druschel
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Fertility treatments and the risk of preterm birth among women with subfertility: a linked-data retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jessica N Sanders; Sara E Simonsen; Christina A Porucznik; Ahmad O Hammoud; Ken R Smith; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.355

7.  Use of fertility treatments in relation to the duration of pregnancy attempt among women who were trying to become pregnant and experienced a live birth.

Authors:  Jessica Sanders; Sara Simonsen; Christina A Porucznik; Laurie Baksh; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-01

Review 8.  On estimating the prevalence of use of medically assisted reproduction in developed countries: a critical review of recent literature.

Authors:  Jasmin Passet-Wittig; Arthur L Greil
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.