Literature DB >> 28379830

Fertility Treatment, Use of in Vitro Fertilization, and Time to Live Birth Based on Initial Provider Type.

Mandy W Boltz1, Jessica N Sanders1, Sara E Simonsen1, Joseph B Stanford2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between the type of clinician (generalist vs subspecialist) initially seen by infertile women, the treatment received, and the time to pregnancy.
METHODS: We analyzed mixed-mode questionnaire data from 867 women with primary infertility enrolled into a retrospective cohort through population- and fertility clinic-based sampling. We compared women presenting first to generalist providers with women presenting first to fertility subspecialists, with the main outcomes of receiving in vitro fertilization (IVF), time to pregnancy, and live birth.
RESULTS: The first contact for most (84%) women with infertility was a generalist provider. Only 8% of women sought care first from a fertility subspecialist, and these women were older and had been trying longer to conceive. Women who presented first to a generalist provider were less likely to receive IVF (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.82), were equally likely to achieve pregnancy, and had similar times to pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.53) compared with women who presented first to a subspecialist.
CONCLUSIONS: Generalist providers are frequently the first point of care for women with difficulty conceiving and are uniquely positioned to promote the balanced management of infertility. © Copyright 2017 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Female; Live Birth; Point-of-Care Systems; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time-to-Pregnancy; Fertilization; Fertilization in Vitro; Infertility

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28379830      PMCID: PMC5533589          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  24 in total

1.  International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009.

Authors:  F Zegers-Hochschild; G D Adamson; J de Mouzon; O Ishihara; R Mansour; K Nygren; E Sullivan; S Vanderpoel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  More Comprehensive Care Among Family Physicians is Associated with Lower Costs and Fewer Hospitalizations.

Authors:  Andrew Bazemore; Stephen Petterson; Lars E Peterson; Robert L Phillips
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.

Authors:  Nanette Okun; Sony Sierra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2014-01

4.  Variation in distress among women with infertility: evidence from a population-based sample.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Karina M Shreffler; Lone Schmidt; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Reassured or fobbed off? Perspectives on infertility consultations in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lisa Hinton; Jenny J Kurinczuk; Sue Ziebland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Infertility treatment in a population-based sample: 2004-2005.

Authors:  Sara E Simonsen; Laurie Baksh; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-05

7.  Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982-2010.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Casey E Copen; Elizabeth Hervey Stephen
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2014-01-22

8.  Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Gladys M Martinez; William D Mosher; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2005-12

Review 9.  Are children born after assisted reproductive technology at increased risk for adverse health outcomes?

Authors:  Laura A Schieve; Sonja A Rasmussen; Germaine M Buck; Diana E Schendel; Meredith A Reynolds; Victoria C Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Infertility and reproductive disorders: impact of hormonal and inflammatory mechanisms on pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Silvia Vannuccini; Vicki L Clifton; Ian S Fraser; Hugh S Taylor; Hilary Critchley; Linda C Giudice; Felice Petraglia
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  4 in total

1.  Positive Effect of Acupuncture and Cupping in Infertility Treatment.

Authors:  Jun-Xiang Wang; Yang Yang; Yue Song; Liang-Xiao Ma
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2018-04-01

2.  Time as an outcome measure in fertility-related clinical studies: long-awaited.

Authors:  Sesh K Sunkara; Wenjing Zheng; Thomas D'Hooghe; Salvatore Longobardi; Jacky Boivin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  International Natural Procreative Technology Evaluation and Surveillance of Treatment for Subfertility (iNEST): enrollment and methods.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Tracey Parnell; Kristi Kantor; Matthew R Reeder; Shahpar Najmabadi; Karen Johnson; Iris Musso; Hanna Hartman; Elizabeth Tham; Ira Winter; Krzysztof Galczynski; Anne Carus; Amy Sherlock; Jean Golden Tevald; Maciej Barczentewicz; Barbara Meier; Paul Carpentier; Karen Poehailos; Robert Chasuk; Peter Danis; Lewis Lipscomb
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-08-09

4.  Restorative reproductive medicine for infertility in two family medicine clinics in New England, an observational study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Paul A Carpentier; Barbara L Meier; Mark Rollo; Benjamin Tingey
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.