Literature DB >> 11882728

Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology.

Laura A Schieve1, Susan F Meikle, Cynthia Ferre, Herbert B Peterson, Gary Jeng, Lynne S Wilcox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increased risk of low birth weight associated with the use of assisted reproductive technology has been attributed largely to the higher rate of multiple gestations associated with such technology. It is uncertain, however, whether singleton infants conceived with the use of assisted reproductive technology may also have a higher risk of low birth weight than those who are conceived spontaneously.
METHODS: We used population-based data to compare the rates of low birth weight (less-than-or-equal 2500 g) and very low birth weight (<1500 g) among infants conceived with assisted reproductive technology with the rates in the general population.
RESULTS: We studied 42,463 infants who were born in 1996 and 1997 and conceived with assisted reproductive technology and used as a comparison group 3,389,098 infants born in the United States in 1997. Among singleton infants born at 37 weeks of gestation or later, those conceived with assisted reproductive technology had a risk of low birth weight that was 2.6 times that in the general population (95 percent confidence interval, 2.4 to 2.7). The use of assisted reproductive technology was associated with an increased rate of multiple gestations; however, its use was not associated with a further increase in the risk of low birth weight in multiple births. Among twins, the ratio of the rate of low birth weight after the use of assisted reproductive technology to the rate in the general population was 1.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.1). Infants conceived with assisted reproductive technology accounted for 0.6 percent of all infants born to mothers who were 20 years of age or older in 1997, but for 3.5 percent of low-birth-weight and 4.3 percent of very-low-birth-weight infants.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of assisted reproductive technology accounts for a disproportionate number of low-birth-weight and very-low-birth-weight infants in the United States, in part because of absolute increases in multiple gestations and in part because of higher rates of low birth weight among singleton infants conceived with this technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11882728     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  199 in total

1.  Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Suleena Kansal Kalra; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Christos Coutifaris; Thomas Molinaro; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Health risks in babies born after assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Alastair G Sutcliffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-20

3.  Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation.

Authors:  Emily L Niemitz; Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  In vitro culture of mouse embryos reduces differential gene expression between inner cell mass and trophectoderm.

Authors:  G Giritharan; L Delle Piane; A Donjacour; F J Esteban; J A Horcajadas; E Maltepe; P Rinaudo
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Changing trends in low birth weight rates among non-Hispanic black infants in the United States, 1991-2004.

Authors:  Cynthia Ferré; Arden Handler; Jason Hsia; Wanda Barfield; James W Collins
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-01

6.  Outlier DNA methylation levels as an indicator of environmental exposure and risk of undesirable birth outcome.

Authors:  Jayashri Ghosh; Monica Mainigi; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 7.  A Molecular Perspective on Procedures and Outcomes with Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Monica A Mainigi; Carmen Sapienza; Samantha Butts; Christos Coutifaris
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

8.  Signaling through FSH receptors on human umbilical vein endothelial cells promotes angiogenesis.

Authors:  Julie A Stilley; Rongbin Guan; Diane M Duffy; Deborah L Segaloff
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Abnormal implantation after fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Erica T Wang; Anupama S Q Kathiresan; Catherine Bresee; Naomi Greene; Carolyn Alexander; Margareta D Pisarska
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Co-bedding as a Comfort measure For Twins undergoing painful procedures (CComForT Trial).

Authors:  Marsha L Campbell-Yeo; C Celeste Johnston; Ks Joseph; Nancy L Feeley; Christine T Chambers; Keith J Barrington
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.