Literature DB >> 19328479

Cumulative pregnancy probabilities among couples with subfertility: effects of varying treatments.

Joseph B Stanford1, Rafael T Mikolajczyk, Courtney D Lynch, Sara E Simonsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To model the cumulative probability of pregnancy among couples with subfertility without a definitive diagnosis, according to different treatment strategies.
DESIGN: A beta distribution of fecundity was fitted that reproduced the cumulative probability of pregnancy in prospective studies of natural fertility, and this distribution was applied to simulated cohorts starting with one million couples each. Probabilities of pregnancy were generated for each cycle of each couple.
SETTING: Simulation study. PATIENT(S): Hypothetic subfertile population. INTERVENTION(S): After 2 or 4 years of attempting pregnancy and diagnostic evaluation to exclude anovulation, tubal obstruction, and severe male factor, simulated treatments were applied to the remaining nonpregnant couples, with treatment effects based on published literature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Simulated cumulative probability of pregnancy. RESULT(S): Initially, the cumulative probability of pregnancy was highest for early treatment with IVF, but over time, conservative treatment or frequent intercourse approached the same cumulative probability. CONCLUSION(S): In couples without clear indications for IVF, the main benefit of early IVF may be to shorten time to pregnancy, a benefit that must be weighed against costs and potential adverse outcomes. Couples should be encouraged to maintain regular intercourse to maximize chances of pregnancy, even after unsuccessful treatment attempts. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19328479     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Differences in cumulus cells gene expression between modified natural and stimulated in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Tanja Burnik Papler; Eda Vrtačnik Bokal; Klementina Fon Tacer; Peter Juvan; Irma Virant Klun; Rok Devjak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Natural procreative technology for infertility and recurrent miscarriage: outcomes in a Canadian family practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tham; Karen Schliep; Joseph Stanford
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A Survey on Main Semen Parameters in Natural Pregnancy and Intrauterine Insemination: Are There Any Significant Differences?

Authors:  Roshanak Aboutorabi; Soudabeh Zamani; Yasaman Zarrin; Fatemeh Sadat Mostafavi
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-05-04

4.  Fertility Treatment, Use of in Vitro Fertilization, and Time to Live Birth Based on Initial Provider Type.

Authors:  Mandy W Boltz; Jessica N Sanders; Sara E Simonsen; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Infertility treatment in a population-based sample: 2004-2005.

Authors:  Sara E Simonsen; Laurie Baksh; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-05

6.  Methods for a Retrospective Population-based and Clinic-based Subfertility Cohort Study: the Fertility Experiences Study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Jessica N Sanders; Sara E Simonsen; Ahmad Hammoud; Mark Gibson; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 7.  'Fertility Awareness-Based Methods' and subfertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Thijssen; A Meier; K Panis; W Ombelet
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014

8.  Use of fertility treatments in relation to the duration of pregnancy attempt among women who were trying to become pregnant and experienced a live birth.

Authors:  Jessica Sanders; Sara Simonsen; Christina A Porucznik; Laurie Baksh; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-01

9.  Restorative reproductive medicine for infertility in two family medicine clinics in New England, an observational study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Paul A Carpentier; Barbara L Meier; Mark Rollo; Benjamin Tingey
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Efficacy of sperm motility after processing and incubation to predict pregnancy after intrauterine insemination in normospermic individuals.

Authors:  Lígia F P de Araújo; Edilberto de Araújo Filho; Cássio L Fácio; Márcia C O Bossoni; Ligiane A Machado-Paula; José E Corrente; Mário Cavagna; Paulo C S Matheus; Anaglória Pontes
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.