Literature DB >> 25572193

Urine aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 differentiate renal carcinomas from other imaged renal masses and bladder and prostate cancer.

Jeremiah J Morrissey1, Jonathan Mobley2, R Sherburne Figenshau3, Joel Vetter2, Sam Bhayani3, Evan D Kharasch4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of urine aquaporin 1 (AQP1) and perilipin 2 (PLIN2) concentrations to diagnose clear cell or papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by comparing urine concentrations of these unique biomarkers in patients with RCC, noncancer renal masses, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer.
METHODS: From February 1, 2012, through October 31, 2012, preoperative urine samples were obtained from patients with a presumptive diagnosis of RCC based on an imaged renal mass, prostate cancer, or transitional cell bladder cancer. Imaged renal masses were diagnosed postnephrectomy—as malignant or benign—by histology. Urine AQP1 and PLIN2 concentrations were measured by using a sensitive and specific Western blot and normalized to urine creatinine concentration.
RESULTS: Median concentrations of urine AQP1 and PLIN2 in patients with clear cell and papillary RCC (n=47) were 29 and 36 relative absorbance units/mg urine creatinine, respectively. In contrast, median concentrations in patients with bladder cancer (n=22) and prostate cancer (n=27), patients with chromophobe tumors (n=7), and patients with benign renal oncocytomas (n=9) and angiomyolipomas (n=7) were all less than 10 relative absorbance units/mg urine creatinine (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<.001 vs RCC for both biomarkers) and comparable with those in healthy controls. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.99 to 1.00 for both biomarkers.
CONCLUSION: These results support the specificity and sensitivity of urine AQP1 and PLIN2 concentrations for RCC. These novel tumor-specific proteins have high clinical validity and high potential as specific screening biomarkers for clear cell and papillary RCC as well as in the differential diagnosis of imaged renal masses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00851994.
Copyright © 2015 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25572193      PMCID: PMC4317334          DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  34 in total

Review 1.  From the RSNA refresher courses: a practical approach to the cystic renal mass.

Authors:  David S Hartman; Peter L Choyke; Matthew S Hartman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Evidence of clinical utility: an unmet need in molecular diagnostics for patients with cancer.

Authors:  David R Parkinson; Robert T McCormack; Susan M Keating; Steven I Gutman; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth A Mansfield; Margaret A Piper; Patricia Deverka; Felix W Frueh; J Milburn Jessup; Lisa M McShane; Sean R Tunis; Caroline C Sigman; Gary J Kelloff
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Role of percutaneous needle biopsy for renal masses.

Authors:  Elaine M Caoili; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge; Antonio Finelli; John R Kachura; Andrew Evans; Hannah Chung; Daniel A Shiff; Kimberly Fernandes; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Urinary biomarkers for the early diagnosis of kidney cancer.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Morrissey; Amy N London; Jingqin Luo; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology.

Authors:  Bruce Schlomer; Robert S Figenshau; Yan Yan; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Prognostic models and algorithms in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian R Lane; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 9.  Histopathology of surgically managed renal tumors: analysis of a contemporary series.

Authors:  David A Duchene; Yair Lotan; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Kenneth S Koeneman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Net reclassification indices for evaluating risk prediction instruments: a critical review.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Zheyu Wang; Holly Janes; Robyn L McClelland; Bruce M Psaty; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Should Small Renal Masses Be Biopsied?

Authors:  Ricardo R N Leão; Ardalan E Ahmad; Patrick O Richard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Evaluation of Urine Aquaporin-1 and Perilipin-2 Concentrations as Biomarkers to Screen for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Morrissey; Vincent M Mellnick; Jingqin Luo; Marilyn J Siegel; R Sherburne Figenshau; Sam Bhayani; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Potential Susceptibility Loci Identified for Renal Cell Carcinoma by Targeting Obesity-Related Genes.

Authors:  Xiang Shu; Mark P Purdue; Yuanqing Ye; Huakang Tu; Christopher G Wood; Nizar M Tannir; Zhaoming Wang; Demetrius Albanes; Susan M Gapstur; Victoria L Stevens; Nathaniel Rothman; Stephen J Chanock; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Aquaporin-graphene interface: relevance to point-of-care device for renal cell carcinoma and desalination.

Authors:  Jakub Jakowiecki; Agnieszka Sztyler; Slawomir Filipek; Pingzuo Li; Karthik Raman; Natarajan Barathiraja; Seeram Ramakrishna; Jairam R Eswara; Ali Altaee; Adel O Sharif; Pulickel M Ajayan; Venkatesan Renugopalakrishnan
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Urinary aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2: Can these novel markers accurately characterize small renal masses and help guide patient management?

Authors:  Joseph B Song; Jeremiah J Morrissey; Jonathan M Mobley; Karen G Figenshau; Joel M Vetter; Sam B Bhayani; Evan D Kharasch; Robert Sherburne Figenshau
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  Effect of selective inhibition of aquaporin 1 on chemotherapy sensitivity of J82 human bladder cancer cells.

Authors:  Xuefeng Zhang; Yun Chen; Liming Dong; Benkang Shi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Research Gaps in the Evaluation and Management of Localized Renal Masses.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Emmanuel Iyoha; Phillip M Pierorazio; Stephen M Sozio; Michael H Johnson; Ritu Sharma; Eric B Bass; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  The kidney cancer research priority-setting partnership: Identifying the top 10 research priorities as defined by patients, caregivers, and expert clinicians.

Authors:  Jennifer Jones; Jaimin Bhatt; Jonathan Avery; Andreas Laupacis; Katherine Cowan; Naveen Basappa; Joan Basiuk; Christina Canil; Sohaib Al-Asaaed; Daniel Heng; Lori Wood; Dawn Stacey; Christian Kollmannsberger; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Bioplasmonic paper-based assay for perilipin-2 non-invasively detects renal cancer.

Authors:  Rong Hu; Rohit Gupta; Zheyu Wang; Congzhou Wang; Hongcheng Sun; Srikanth Singamaneni; Evan D Kharasch; Jeremiah J Morrissey
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 10.  Decision-making in active surveillance in kidney cancer: current trends and future urine and tissue markers.

Authors:  Sunil H Patel; Nirmish Singla; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.