Literature DB >> 9044163

Bioequivalence assessment of etoposide phosphate and etoposide using pharmacodynamic and traditional pharmacokinetic parameters.

V Mummaneni1, S Kaul, L N Igwemezie, D R Newell, D Porter, H Thomas, A H Calvert, B Winograd, R H Barbhaiya.   

Abstract

The bioequivalence of etoposide phosphate, a prodrug of etoposide, to etoposide was assessed in a randomized, crossover study in 29 patients with histologically established solid tumors that had failed conventional treatment. Cohorts of patients received one treatment course each of etoposide and etoposide phosphate which consisted of a 100 mg/m2 per day etoposide equivalent dose infused i.v. over 1 hr on a Day 1 to 5 schedule of treatment. The second course was administered 21 days later or on recovery of blood cell counts. Plasma and urine samples were collected over 24 hr on Day 1 of each course and assayed for etoposide content by a validated HPLC/UV method. Resulting data were subjected to noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. Hematology profiles were obtained by collecting blood samples prior to the first course and twice a week after each course. The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of etoposide were virtually identical after the two treatments. The point estimates (90% confidence intervals) for nadir WBC, granulocytes, hemoglobin, and platelets expressed as % decrease from the baseline, and for the pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, and AUC0 infinity, after intravenous etoposide phosphate relative to etoposide were 100% (96%, 105%), 97% (91%, 103%), 95% (82%, 109%), 95% (84%, 106%), 107% (101%, 113%), and 113% (107%, 119%), respectively. Therefore, etoposide phosphate is bioequivalent to etoposide based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9044163     DOI: 10.1007/bf02353515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  17 in total

1.  Cracking of ABS plastic devices used to infuse undiluted etoposide injection.

Authors:  T L Schwinghammer; M Reilly; C S Rosenfeld
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1988-06

2.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

3.  A general model of metabolite kinetics following intravenous and oral administration of the parent drug.

Authors:  M Weiss
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.627

4.  Clinical equivalence of two tablet formulations of felodipine. A placebo-controlled study of 24-hour blood pressure control and tolerability.

Authors:  B P McGrath; R W Watts; D B Elmfeldt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of etoposide following intravenous administration of etoposide phosphate and etoposide in patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  S Kaul; L N Igwemezie; D J Stewart; S Z Fields; M Kosty; N Levithan; R Bukowski; D Gandara; G Goss; P O'Dwyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Phase I evaluation of a water-soluble etoposide prodrug, etoposide phosphate, given as a 5-minute infusion on days 1, 3, and 5 in patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  D R Budman; L N Igwemezie; S Kaul; J Behr; S Lichtman; P Schulman; V Vinciguerra; S L Allen; J Kolitz; K Hock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Assessment of toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics following intravenous administration of etoposide phosphate in beagle dogs.

Authors:  L N Igwemezie; S Kaul; R H Barbhaiya
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusion makes high-dose etoposide a safe outpatient regimen that is effective in lymphoma and myeloma patients.

Authors:  A M Gianni; M Bregni; S Siena; M Magni; M Di Nicola; F Lombardi; C Tarella; A Pileri; G Bonadonna
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Autologous bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia using busulfan plus etoposide as a preparative regimen.

Authors:  C A Linker; C A Ries; L E Damon; H S Rugo; J L Wolf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Busulfan/etoposide--initial experience with a new preparatory regimen for autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  N J Chao; A S Stein; G D Long; R S Negrin; M D Amylon; R M Wong; S J Forman; K G Blume
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.