Literature DB >> 21548127

Balanced information about Down syndrome: what is essential?

Kathryn B Sheets1, Robert G Best, Campbell K Brasington, Madeleine C Will.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of genetic counselors and parents of children with Down syndrome to define essential information for the initial discussion of a new diagnosis. We compared information given in both prenatal and postnatal settings, and also aimed to distinguish differences between the informational needs of parents and the information genetic counselors provide. Online surveys were distributed to members of the National Down Syndrome Congress, National Down Syndrome Society, and National Society of Genetic Counselors. Participants included 993 parents of children with Down syndrome and 389 genetic counselors. Participants rated 100 informational features about Down syndrome as Essential, Important, or Not Too Important for inclusion in the first discussion of the diagnosis. Responses identified 34 essential informational items for the initial discussion of Down syndrome, including clinical features, developmental abilities, a range of prognostications, and informational resources. Healthcare providers should consider incorporating these items in their initial discussion of a diagnosis in both prenatal and postnatal settings. Statistically significant differences between parent and genetic counselor responses illustrate that information is valued differently and that parents appreciate information about the abilities and potential of people with Down syndrome, as opposed to clinical details. Balancing clinical information with other aspects of the condition, as well as a better understanding of the information parents consider most important, may enable healthcare professionals to more effectively satisfy families' informational needs following a new diagnosis of Down syndrome.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21548127     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  12 in total

1.  Effects of a genetic counseling model on mothers of children with down syndrome: a Brazilian pilot study.

Authors:  Marcos Ricardo Datti Micheletto; Nelson Iguimar Valerio; Agnes Cristina Fett-Conte
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Practice guidelines for communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Kathryn B Sheets; Blythe G Crissman; Cori D Feist; Susan L Sell; Lisa R Johnson; Kelly C Donahue; Diane Masser-Frye; Gail S Brookshire; Amanda M Carre; Danielle Lagrave; Campbell K Brasington
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Prenatal testing for intellectual disability: misperceptions and reality with lessons from Down syndrome.

Authors:  Kruti Acharya
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2011

4.  Impact of the increased adoption of prenatal cfDNA screening on non-profit patient advocacy organizations in the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie Meredith; Christopher Kaposy; Victoria J Miller; Megan Allyse; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Marsha Michie
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  What is a "balanced" description? Insight from parents of individuals with down syndrome.

Authors:  Catriona Hippman; Angela Inglis; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Women's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about Down syndrome: a qualitative research study.

Authors:  Denise M Levis; Shelly Harris; Nedra Whitehead; Rebecca Moultrie; Kara Duwe; Sonja A Rasmussen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Presenting life with cystic fibrosis: a Q-methodological approach to developing balanced, experience-based prenatal screening information.

Authors:  Katherine F Wright; Louise D Bryant; Stephen Morley; Jenny Hewison; Alistair J A Duff; Daniel Peckham
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening: An assessment of written materials.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; Stephanie A Kraft; Mollie A Minear; Roberta R Ryan; Megan A Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13

10.  Changing Needs for Information and Support in an Online System for Parents of Children With Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Maury Pinsk; David Nicholas
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2017-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.