Literature DB >> 22544646

Women's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about Down syndrome: a qualitative research study.

Denise M Levis1, Shelly Harris, Nedra Whitehead, Rebecca Moultrie, Kara Duwe, Sonja A Rasmussen.   

Abstract

Women who are or may become pregnant need up-to-date information about Down syndrome (DS). Asking women about their knowledge, opinions, resources, and information needs on the topic of DS is an important precursor to develop effective strategies for education. We conducted 24 focus groups (N = 111) in two US cities with women who were recently pregnant (who had a child ≤ 3 years old without DS) and women who planned to have a child in the next year. Groups were further segmented by age and race-ethnicity. Questions explored women's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about DS; resources used to obtain information about health and DS; and information needs on the topic of DS. All participants reported having some knowledge of DS: facial features, chromosomal condition, and maternal age as a risk factor. Many participants had misconceptions, including the life expectancy for persons with DS, other maternal and paternal risk factors, and the idea that having a child with DS would disrupt their lives. Participants requested stories to help illustrate what life is like for families with DS. Many Hispanic and African American participants said they only saw or knew of Caucasian persons with DS and requested culturally diverse educational materials about DS. Participants said they would seek information on DS from the Internet and from their health care providers. Results suggest that women need tailored materials that contain clinical information about DS as well as information about living with a child with DS. Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22544646      PMCID: PMC4706760          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  21 in total

1.  Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006.

Authors:  Samantha E Parker; Cara T Mai; Mark A Canfield; Russel Rickard; Ying Wang; Robert E Meyer; Patrick Anderson; Craig A Mason; Julianne S Collins; Russell S Kirby; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2010-09-28

2.  Setting a public health research agenda for Down syndrome: summary of a meeting sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Down Syndrome Society.

Authors:  Sonja A Rasmussen; Nedra Whitehead; Sarah A Collier; Jaime L Frías
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: how best to deliver the news.

Authors:  Brian G Skotko; Priya S Kishnani; George T Capone
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21 by sequencing of DNA in maternal blood: a study in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Mathias Ehrich; Cosmin Deciu; Tricia Zwiefelhofer; John A Tynan; Lesley Cagasan; Roger Tim; Vivian Lu; Ron McCullough; Erin McCarthy; Anders O H Nygren; Jarrod Dean; Lin Tang; Don Hutchison; Tim Lu; Huiquan Wang; Vach Angkachatchai; Paul Oeth; Charles R Cantor; Allan Bombard; Dirk van den Boom
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Fetal-specific DNA methylation ratio permits noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21.

Authors:  Elisavet A Papageorgiou; Alex Karagrigoriou; Evdokia Tsaliki; Voula Velissariou; Nigel P Carter; Philippos C Patsalis
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Maternal decision to terminate pregnancy in case of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Marijke J Korenromp; Godelieve C M L Page-Christiaens; Jan van den Bout; Eduard J H Mulder; Gerard H A Visser
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Balanced information about Down syndrome: what is essential?

Authors:  Kathryn B Sheets; Robert G Best; Campbell K Brasington; Madeleine C Will
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Understanding attitudes toward people with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Jill E Pace; Mikyong Shin; Sonja A Rasmussen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study.

Authors:  Rossa W K Chiu; Ranjit Akolekar; Yama W L Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Hao Sun; K C Allen Chan; Fiona M F Lun; Attie T J I Go; Elizabeth T Lau; William W K To; Wing C Leung; Rebecca Y K Tang; Sidney K C Au-Yeung; Helena Lam; Yu Y Kung; Xiuqing Zhang; John M G van Vugt; Ryoko Minekawa; Mary H Y Tang; Jun Wang; Cees B M Oudejans; Tze K Lau; Kypros H Nicolaides; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-01-11

10.  Divorce in families of children with Down syndrome: a population-based study.

Authors:  Richard C Urbano; Robert M Hodapp
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2007-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Knowledge of birth defects among nursing mothers in a developing country.

Authors:  Taiwo Akeem Lawal; Oyindamola Bidemi Yusuf; Akinola Ayoola Fatiregun
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Impact of the increased adoption of prenatal cfDNA screening on non-profit patient advocacy organizations in the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie Meredith; Christopher Kaposy; Victoria J Miller; Megan Allyse; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Marsha Michie
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening: An assessment of written materials.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; Stephanie A Kraft; Mollie A Minear; Roberta R Ryan; Megan A Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13

5.  Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review.

Authors:  Valérie Labonté; Dima Alsaid; Britta Lang; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.