Literature DB >> 21541173

Observing behavior and atypically restricted stimulus control.

William V Dube1, Chata A Dickson, Lyn M Balsamo, Kristin Lombard O'Donnell, Gerson Y Tomanari, Kevin M Farren, Emily E Wheeler, William J McIlvane.   

Abstract

Restricted stimulus control refers to discrimination learning with atypical limitations in the range of controlling stimuli or stimulus features. In the study reported here, 4 normally capable individuals and 10 individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) performed two-sample delayed matching to sample. Sample-stimulus observing was recorded with an eye-tracking apparatus. High accuracy scores indicated stimulus control by both sample stimuli for the 4 nondisabled participants and 4 participants with ID, and eye tracking data showed reliable observing of all stimuli. Intermediate accuracy scores indicated restricted stimulus control for the remaining 6 participants. Their eye-tracking data showed that errors were related to failures to observe sample stimuli and relatively brief observing durations. Five of these participants were then given interventions designed to improve observing behavior. For 4 participants, the interventions resulted initially in elimination of observing failures, increased observing durations, and increased accuracy. For 2 of these participants, contingencies sufficient to maintain adequate observing were not always sufficient to maintain high accuracy; subsequent procedure modifications restored it, however. For the 5th participant, initial improvements in observing were not accompanied by improved accuracy, an apparent instance of observing without attending; accuracy improved only after an additional intervention that imposed contingencies on observing behavior. Thus, interventions that control observing behavior seem necessary but may not always be sufficient for the remediation of restricted stimulus control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  humans; matching to sample; observing behavior; restricted stimulus control; stimulus overselectivity; touchscreen

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21541173      PMCID: PMC2972782          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  Restricted stimulus control and inferred attentional deficits in autistic and retarded children.

Authors:  A J Litrownik; E T McInnis; A M Wetzel-Pritchard; D L Filipelli
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1978-10

2.  Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children.

Authors:  L Schreibman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1975

Review 3.  Systematic review of early intensive behavioral interventions for children with autism.

Authors:  Patricia Howlin; Iliana Magiati; Tony Charman
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2009-01

Review 4.  The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimulus overselectivity in autism: a review of research.

Authors:  O I Lovaas; R L Koegel; L Schreibman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Reading and auditory-visual equivalences.

Authors:  M Sidman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-03

7.  Verbal self-reports about matching to sample: effects of the number of elements in a compound sample stimulus.

Authors:  T S Critchfield; M Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Endogenous and exogenous control of visual selection.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  High-probability stimulus control topographies with delayed S+ onset in a simultaneous discrimination procedure.

Authors:  William J McIlvane; Joanne B Kledaras; T C Callahan; William V Dube
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Functional anatomy of impaired selective attention and compensatory processing in autism.

Authors:  Matthew K Belmonte; Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Relational discrimination by pigeons in a go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli: a methodological note.

Authors:  Heloísa Cursi Campos; Paula Debert; Romariz da Silva Barros; William J McIlvane
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.

Authors:  Stephanie Gomes-Ng; Douglas Elliffe; Sarah Cowie
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Eye tracking research to answer questions about augmentative and alternative communication assessment and intervention.

Authors:  Krista M Wilkinson; Teresa Mitchell
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Reducing overselective stimulus control with differential observing responses.

Authors:  Rachel S Farber; Chata A Dickson; William V Dube
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2016-11-11

Review 5.  The potential influence of stimulus overselectivity in AAC: information from eye tracking and behavioral studies of attention with individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  William V Dube; Krista M Wilkinson
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Investigating Gaze Behaviour of Children Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Classroom Setting.

Authors:  Aideen McParland; Stephen Gallagher; Mickey Keenan
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-02-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.