Literature DB >> 27861843

Reducing overselective stimulus control with differential observing responses.

Rachel S Farber1, Chata A Dickson2, William V Dube1.   

Abstract

Overselective stimulus control refers to discriminative control in which the number of controlling stimuli is too limited for effective behavior. Experiment 1 included 22 special-education students who exhibited overselective stimulus control on a two-sample delayed matching task. An intervention added a compound identity matching opportunity within the sample observation period of the matching trials. The compound matching functioned as a differential observing response (DOR) in that high accuracy verified observation and discrimination of both sample stimuli. Nineteen participants learned to perform the DOR and two-sample delayed matching accuracy increased substantially for 16 of them. When the DOR was completely withdrawn after 10 sessions, accuracy declined. In Experiment 2, a more gradual withdrawal of DOR requirements showed that highly accurate performance could be maintained with the DOR on only a proportion of trials for most participants. The results show that DOR training may lead to a general improvement in observing behavior.
© 2016 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  differential observing responses; intellectual disabilities; matching to sample; overselective stimulus control

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27861843      PMCID: PMC5235982          DOI: 10.1002/jaba.363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  20 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus overselectivity four decades later: a review of the literature and its implications for current research in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Bertram O Ploog
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2010-11

2.  Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence.

Authors:  M R Markham; M J Dougher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Matching-to-sample assessment of stimulus overselectivity in students with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Chata A Dickson; Curtis K Deutsch; Sharon S Wang; William V Dube
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2006-11

4.  Use of a differential observing response to expand restricted stimulus control.

Authors:  Carrie Wallace Walpole; Eileen M Roscoe; William V Dube
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

5.  An evaluation of persistence of treatment effects during long-term treatment of destructive behavior.

Authors:  David P Wacker; Jay W Harding; Wendy K Berg; John F Lee; Kelly M Schieltz; Yaniz C Padilla; John A Nevin; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The Discrimination of Printed Words by Prereading Children.

Authors:  J Helen Yoo; Kathryn J Saunders
Journal:  Eur J Behav Anal       Date:  2014

7.  Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input.

Authors:  O I Lovaas; L Schreibman; R Koegel; R Rehm
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1971-06

Review 8.  The potential influence of stimulus overselectivity in AAC: information from eye tracking and behavioral studies of attention with individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  William V Dube; Krista M Wilkinson
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Stimulus Overselectivity in Autism, Down Syndrome, and Typical Development.

Authors:  William V Dube; Rachel S Farber; Marlana R Mueller; Eileen Grant; Lucy Lorin; Curtis K Deutsch
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2016-05

10.  Conditional relations with compound abstract stimuli using a go/no-go procedure.

Authors:  Paula Debert; Maria Amelia Matos; William McIlvane
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Algorithmic analysis of relational learning processes in instructional technology: Some implications for basic, translational, and applied research.

Authors:  William J McIlvane; Joanne B Kledaras; Christophe J Gerard; Lorin Wilde; David Smelson
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.