Literature DB >> 21540244

FINHYST, a prospective study of 5279 hysterectomies: complications and their risk factors.

Tea H I Brummer1, Jyrki Jalkanen, Jaana Fraser, Anna-Mari Heikkinen, Minna Kauko, Juha Mäkinen, Tomi Seppälä, Jari Sjöberg, Eija Tomás, Päivi Härkki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hysterectomy guidelines highlight an increase in urinary tract injuries with laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). This national survey analyses complications of LH, abdominal hysterectomy (AH) and vaginal hysterectomy (VH).
METHODS: A prospective cohort undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications during 2006 was drawn from 53 hospitals in Finland; all communal hospitals participated. Detailed questionnaires covered surgical data and intra- and post-operative major and minor complications, for which risk factors were analysed by a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for surgical data and patient characteristics.
RESULTS: Major complications rates in AH (n= 1255, 24%), LH (1679, 32%) and VH (2345, 44%) were 4.0, 4.3 and 2.6%, and total complications rates were 19.2, 15.4 and 11.7%, respectively. Logistic regression showed no statistically significant differences between approaches for any organ injuries or other major complications. Most bladder and bowel injuries (88 and 83%), but not ureter injuries (10%), were recognized intra-operatively. The ureter injury rate was low after LH (0.3%), as it was after other types of hysterectomy. Compared with LH, AH increased the odds of wound infection, and was an independent risk factor for urinary infections and febrile events. Compared with AH, LH and VH both presented a higher risk for pelvic infection; surgically treated equally often regardless of the type of hysterectomy. No differences in complications emerged between LH and VH. Obesity was a risk factor for many infections. Surgical adhesiolysis [odds ratio (OR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-4.21] was the strongest single risk factor for major complications as a whole. Bladder injury was associated with a history of caesarean section (OR 4.01, 95% CI 2.06-7.83) and with a large uterus ≥500 g (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.05-7.90), while bowel injury was associated with adhesiolysis (OR 29.07, 95% CI 7.17-117.88).
CONCLUSIONS: FINHYST is a large prospective hysterectomy study illustrating actual complications. Whenever possible, hysterectomy should be minimally invasive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21540244     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  42 in total

Review 1.  A call for new standard of care in perioperative gynecologic oncology practice: Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs.

Authors:  Ester Miralpeix; Alpa M Nick; Larissa A Meyer; Juan Cata; Javier Lasala; Gabriel E Mena; Vijaya Gottumukkala; Maria Iniesta-Donate; Gloria Salvo; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Emerging Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Pros and Cons.

Authors:  P Marco Fisichella; Steven R DeMeester; Eric Hungness; Silvana Perretta; Nathaniel J Soper; Alexander Rosemurgy; Alfonso Torquati; Ajit K Sachdeva; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Rates and Routes of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications in Austria 2002 - 2014.

Authors:  Katharina Maria Edler; Karl Tamussino; Gerhard Fülöp; Evi Reinstadler; Walter Neunteufel; Philipp Reif; Rene Laky; Thomas Aigmüller
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic ureter injuries: an analysis of 31 cases during laparoscopic hysterectomy in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Petra F Janssen; Hans A M Brölmann; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Vesicoureteral Injury during Benign Hysterectomy: Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy.

Authors:  Erica J Chang; Rachel S Mandelbaum; David J Nusbaum; Caroline J Violette; Kazuhide Matsushima; Maximilian Klar; Shinya Matsuzaki; Hiroko Machida; Hiroyuki Kanao; Lynda D Roman; Koji Matsuo
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)

Authors:  K J Neis; W Zubke; T Römer; K Schwerdtfeger; T Schollmeyer; S Rimbach; B Holthaus; E Solomayer; B Bojahr; F Neis; C Reisenauer; B Gabriel; H Dieterich; I B Runnenbaum; W Kleine; A Strauss; M Menton; I Mylonas; M David; L-C Horn; D Schmidt; P Gaß; A T Teichmann; P Brandner; W Stummvoll; A Kuhn; M Müller; M Fehr; K Tamussino
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  The limited utility of currently available venous thromboembolism risk assessment tools in gynecological oncology patients.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The effect of adenomyosis on the outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ali Yavuzcan; Alper Başbuğ; Merve Baştan; Mete Çağlar; İsmail Özdemir
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-09-01

9.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroid treatment: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Chung Y Kong; Lesley Meng; Zehra B Omer; J Shannon Swan; Serene Srouji; G Scott Gazelle; Fiona M Fennessy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Iatrogenic lower urinary tract injury at the time of pelvic reconstructive surgery: does previous pelvic surgery increase the risk?

Authors:  Docile Saguan; Gina Northington; Orawee Chinthakanan; Catherine Hudson; Deborah Karp
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.