Literature DB >> 27667852

Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)

K J Neis1, W Zubke2, T Römer3, K Schwerdtfeger4, T Schollmeyer5, S Rimbach6, B Holthaus7, E Solomayer1, B Bojahr8, F Neis2, C Reisenauer2, B Gabriel9, H Dieterich10, I B Runnenbaum11, W Kleine12, A Strauss13, M Menton14, I Mylonas15, M David16, L-C Horn17, D Schmidt18, P Gaß19, A T Teichmann20, P Brandner21, W Stummvoll22, A Kuhn23, M Müller23, M Fehr24, K Tamussino25.   

Abstract

Background: Official guideline "indications and methods of hysterectomy" to assign indications for the different methods published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) and the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). Besides vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy, three additional techniques have been implemented due to the introduction of laparoscopy. Organ-sparing alternatives were also integrated.
Methods: The guideline group consisted of 26 experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Recommendations were developed using a structured consensus process and independent moderation. A systematic literature search and quality appraisal of benefits and harms of the therapeutic alternatives for symptomatic fibroids, dysfunctional bleeding and adenomyosis was done through MEDLINE up to 6/2014 focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
Results: All types of hysterectomy led in studies to high rates of patient satisfaction. If possible, vaginal instead of abdominal hysterectomy should preferably be done. If a vaginal hysterectomy is not feasible, the possibility of a laparoscopic hysterectomy should be considered. An abdominal hysterectomy should only be done with a special indication. Organ-sparing interventions also led to high patient satisfaction rates, but contain the risk of symptom recurrence.
Conclusion: As an aim, patients should be enabled to choose that therapeutic intervention for their benign disease of the uterus that convenes best to them and their personal life situation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bleeding disorders; endometriosis; guideline; hysterectomy; uterine myomas

Year:  2016        PMID: 27667852      PMCID: PMC5031283          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-104288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  51 in total

Review 1.  Supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sari Kives; Guylaine Lefebvre
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2010-01

2.  Prevalence of low-risk and high-risk types of human papillomavirus and other risk factors for HPV infection in Germany within different age groups in women up to 30 years of age: an epidemiological observational study.

Authors:  Thomas Iftner; Sonja Eberle; Angelika Iftner; Barbara Holz; Norbert Banik; Wim Quint; Anja-Natascha Straube
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches.

Authors:  Laurie B Landeen; Maria C Bell; Helen B Hubert; Larissa Y Bennis; Siri S Knutsen-Larson; Usha Seshadri-Kreaden
Journal:  S D Med       Date:  2011-06

4.  A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Beri Ridgeway; Amy J Park; J Eric Jelovsek; Matthew D Barber; Tommaso Falcone; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Pre-operative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids.

Authors:  A Lethaby; B Vollenhoven; M Sowter
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

6.  The quality of life in women suffering from gynecological disorders is improved by means of hysterectomy. Absolute and relative differences between pre- and postoperative measures.

Authors:  T Rannestad; O J Eikeland; H Helland; U Qvarnström
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 7.  The use of recombinant activated FVII in postpartum hemorrhage.

Authors:  Massimo Franchini; Massimo Franchi; Valentino Bergamini; Martina Montagnana; Gian Luca Salvagno; Giovanni Targher; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.190

8.  Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Lavonne Kots; Nebojsa Stevanovic; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Eefje N de Vries; Hubert A Prins; Rogier M P H Crolla; Adriaan J den Outer; George van Andel; Sven H van Helden; Wolfgang S Schlack; M Agnès van Putten; Dirk J Gouma; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Susanne M Smorenburg; Marja A Boermeester
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Lee A Learman; Robert L Summitt; R Edward Varner; S Gene McNeeley; Deborah Goodman-Gruen; Holly E Richter; Feng Lin; Jonathan Showstack; Christine C Ireland; Eric Vittinghoff; Stephen B Hulley; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  5 in total

1.  Incidental (Prophylactic) Salpingectomy at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and Cesarean Section: a Survey of Practice in Austria.

Authors:  F L Potz; G Tomasch; S Polterauer; R Laky; C Marth; K Tamussino
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Rates and Routes of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications in Austria 2002 - 2014.

Authors:  Katharina Maria Edler; Karl Tamussino; Gerhard Fülöp; Evi Reinstadler; Walter Neunteufel; Philipp Reif; Rene Laky; Thomas Aigmüller
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Regional variation of hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases in Switzerland.

Authors:  Nina Stoller; Maria M Wertli; Tabea M Zaugg; Alan G Haynes; Arnaud Chiolero; Nicolas Rodondi; Radoslaw Panczak; Drahomir Aujesky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?

Authors:  Felix Neis; Christl Reisenauer; Bernhard Kraemer; Philipp Wagner; Sara Brucker
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 5.  Current Role of Hysterectomy in Pelvic Floor Surgery: Time for Reappraisal? A Review of Current Literature and Expert Discussion.

Authors:  Guenter K Noé; Annelize Barnard; Sven Schiermeier; Michael Anapolski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.