K J Neis1, W Zubke2, T Römer3, K Schwerdtfeger4, T Schollmeyer5, S Rimbach6, B Holthaus7, E Solomayer1, B Bojahr8, F Neis2, C Reisenauer2, B Gabriel9, H Dieterich10, I B Runnenbaum11, W Kleine12, A Strauss13, M Menton14, I Mylonas15, M David16, L-C Horn17, D Schmidt18, P Gaß19, A T Teichmann20, P Brandner21, W Stummvoll22, A Kuhn23, M Müller23, M Fehr24, K Tamussino25. 1. Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin der Universitätsklinik des Saarlandes. 2. Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikum Tübingen. 3. Evangelisches Krankenhaus Köln-Weyertal. 4. Klinik für Neurochirurgie der Universitätsklinik des Saarlandes. 5. Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein. 6. Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Krankenhaus Agatharied GmbH. 7. Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe St. Elisabeth Krankenhaus Damme. 8. Klinik für MIC Minimal Invasive Chirurgie am Ev. Krankenhaus Hubertus in Berlin. 9. Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden. 10. Privates Brustzentrum Rheinfelden. 11. Universitätsklinikum Jena Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe. 12. Universitätsklinikum Mannheim Klink für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe. 13. Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel. 14. Dysplasiezentrum Reutlingen. 15. Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Klinikum der Universität München. 16. Campus Virchow-Klinikum Charité Klinik für Gynäkologie. 17. Institut für Pathologie Universitätsklinikum Leipzig. 18. Institut für Pathologie Mannheim. 19. Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Frauenklinik. 20. Frauenklinik Aschaffenburg. 21. Frauenärzte-West Saarbrücken. 22. Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Linz. 23. Inselspital Bern. 24. Kantonsspital Frauenfeld. 25. Universitäts-Frauenklinik Graz.
Abstract
Background: Official guideline "indications and methods of hysterectomy" to assign indications for the different methods published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) and the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). Besides vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy, three additional techniques have been implemented due to the introduction of laparoscopy. Organ-sparing alternatives were also integrated. Methods: The guideline group consisted of 26 experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Recommendations were developed using a structured consensus process and independent moderation. A systematic literature search and quality appraisal of benefits and harms of the therapeutic alternatives for symptomatic fibroids, dysfunctional bleeding and adenomyosis was done through MEDLINE up to 6/2014 focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Results: All types of hysterectomy led in studies to high rates of patient satisfaction. If possible, vaginal instead of abdominal hysterectomy should preferably be done. If a vaginal hysterectomy is not feasible, the possibility of a laparoscopic hysterectomy should be considered. An abdominal hysterectomy should only be done with a special indication. Organ-sparing interventions also led to high patient satisfaction rates, but contain the risk of symptom recurrence. Conclusion: As an aim, patients should be enabled to choose that therapeutic intervention for their benign disease of the uterus that convenes best to them and their personal life situation.
Background: Official guideline "indications and methods of hysterectomy" to assign indications for the different methods published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) and the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). Besides vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy, three additional techniques have been implemented due to the introduction of laparoscopy. Organ-sparing alternatives were also integrated. Methods: The guideline group consisted of 26 experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Recommendations were developed using a structured consensus process and independent moderation. A systematic literature search and quality appraisal of benefits and harms of the therapeutic alternatives for symptomatic fibroids, dysfunctional bleeding and adenomyosis was done through MEDLINE up to 6/2014 focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Results: All types of hysterectomy led in studies to high rates of patient satisfaction. If possible, vaginal instead of abdominal hysterectomy should preferably be done. If a vaginal hysterectomy is not feasible, the possibility of a laparoscopic hysterectomy should be considered. An abdominal hysterectomy should only be done with a special indication. Organ-sparing interventions also led to high patient satisfaction rates, but contain the risk of symptom recurrence. Conclusion: As an aim, patients should be enabled to choose that therapeutic intervention for their benign disease of the uterus that convenes best to them and their personal life situation.
Authors: Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Beri Ridgeway; Amy J Park; J Eric Jelovsek; Matthew D Barber; Tommaso Falcone; Jon I Einarsson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Eefje N de Vries; Hubert A Prins; Rogier M P H Crolla; Adriaan J den Outer; George van Andel; Sven H van Helden; Wolfgang S Schlack; M Agnès van Putten; Dirk J Gouma; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Susanne M Smorenburg; Marja A Boermeester Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lee A Learman; Robert L Summitt; R Edward Varner; S Gene McNeeley; Deborah Goodman-Gruen; Holly E Richter; Feng Lin; Jonathan Showstack; Christine C Ireland; Eric Vittinghoff; Stephen B Hulley; A Eugene Washington Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Katharina Maria Edler; Karl Tamussino; Gerhard Fülöp; Evi Reinstadler; Walter Neunteufel; Philipp Reif; Rene Laky; Thomas Aigmüller Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Nina Stoller; Maria M Wertli; Tabea M Zaugg; Alan G Haynes; Arnaud Chiolero; Nicolas Rodondi; Radoslaw Panczak; Drahomir Aujesky Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Felix Neis; Christl Reisenauer; Bernhard Kraemer; Philipp Wagner; Sara Brucker Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2021-08-28 Impact factor: 2.344