Literature DB >> 25055272

MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroid treatment: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Chung Y Kong1, Lesley Meng, Zehra B Omer, J Shannon Swan, Serene Srouji, G Scott Gazelle, Fiona M Fennessy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of a treatment strategy for symptomatic uterine fibroids that uses MRI-guided focused ultrasound as a first-line therapy relative to uterine artery embolization (UAE) or hysterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We developed a decision-analytic model to compare the cost effectiveness of three first-line treatment strategies: MRI-guided focused ultrasound, UAE, and hysterectomy. Treatment-specific short- and long-term utilities, lifetime costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were incorporated, allowing us to conduct an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, using a societal willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY to designate a strategy as cost effective. Sensitivity analyses were subsequently performed on all key parameters. RESULTS. In the base-case analysis, UAE as a first-line treatment of symptomatic fibroids was the most effective and expensive strategy (22.75 QALYs; $22,968), followed by MRI-guided focused ultrasound (22.73 QALYs; $20,252) and hysterectomy (22.54 QALYs; $11,253). MRI-guided focused ultrasound was cost effective relative to hysterectomy, with an associated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $47,891/QALY. The ICER of UAE relative to MRI-guided focused ultrasound was $234,565/QALY, exceeding the WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY, therefore rendering MRI-guided focused ultrasound also cost effective relative to UAE. In sensitivity analyses, results were robust to changes in most parameters but were sensitive to changes in probabilities of recurrence, symptom relief, and quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSION. First-line treatment of eligible women with MRI-guided focused ultra-sound is a cost-effective noninvasive strategy. For those not eligible for MRI-guided focused ultra-sound, UAE remains a cost-effective option. These recommendations integrate both the short- and long-term decrements in quality of life associated with the specific treatment modalities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI-guided focused ultrasound; cost effectiveness; hysterectomy; uterine fibroids

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25055272      PMCID: PMC4321860          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  40 in total

1.  MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Clare M C Tempany; Elizabeth A Stewart; Nathan McDannold; Bradley J Quade; Ferenc A Jolesz; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Cost-effectiveness of uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy for uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Molly T Beinfeld; Johanna L Bosch; Keith B Isaacson; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  FDA approves ultrasound fibroid therapy.

Authors:  Sarah Ringold
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Cost-effectiveness in a flat world--can ICDs help the United States get rhythm?

Authors:  Lee Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome.

Authors:  V Mais; S Ajossa; S Guerriero; M Mascia; E Solla; G B Melis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Outcome and resource use associated with myomectomy.

Authors:  S Subramanian; M A Clark; K Isaacson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health-state quality factors.

Authors:  D G Fryback; E J Dasbach; R Klein; B E Klein; N Dorn; K Peterson; P A Martin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Wladyslaw M W Gedroyc; Clare M C Tempany; Bradley J Quade; Yael Inbar; Tilman Ehrenstein; Asher Shushan; Jonathan T Hindley; Robert D Goldin; Matthias David; Miri Sklair; Jaron Rabinovici
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Pregnancy outcome after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for conservative treatment of uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Jaron Rabinovici; Matthias David; Hidenobu Fukunishi; Yutaka Morita; Bobbie S Gostout; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  16 in total

1.  Focused Ultrasound: An Emerging Therapeutic Modality for Neurologic Disease.

Authors:  Paul S Fishman; Victor Frenkel
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Urological complications of uterine leiomyoma: a review of literature.

Authors:  Gautam Dagur; Yiji Suh; Kelly Warren; Navjot Singh; John Fitzgerald; Sardar A Khan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Non-invasive Renal Denervation: Update on External Ultrasound Approaches.

Authors:  Roland E Schmieder; Christian Ott; Peter Bramlage
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Emerging non-cancer applications of therapeutic ultrasound.

Authors:  Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.914

5.  Uterine artery embolisation versus myomectomy for premenopausal women with uterine fibroids wishing to avoid hysterectomy: the FEMME RCT.

Authors:  Jane Daniels; Lee J Middleton; Versha Cheed; William McKinnon; Dikshyanta Rana; Fusun Sirkeci; Isaac Manyonda; Anna-Maria Belli; Mary Ann Lumsden; Jonathan Moss; Olivia Wu; Klim McPherson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 4.106

Review 6.  Potential of minimally invasive procedures in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a focus on magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Krisztina Fischer; Nathan J McDannold; Clare M Tempany; Ferenc A Jolesz; Fiona M Fennessy
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-13

7.  A comparative study on the effects of MRI- and CT-guided interventional therapies on uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Yongxu Mu; Ruiqiang Yan; Junfeng He; Xiaoyan Hu; Qiming Li; Haiyan Liu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Cost and Distribution of Hysterectomy and Uterine Artery Embolization in the United States: Regional/Rural/Urban Disparities.

Authors:  Marquisette Glass Lewis; Olúgbémiga T Ekúndayò
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-16

Review 9.  Focused Ultrasound for Essential Tremor: Review of the Evidence and Discussion of Current Hurdles.

Authors:  Mohammad Rohani; Alfonso Fasano
Journal:  Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)       Date:  2017-05-05

Review 10.  Treatment of Movement Disorders With Focused Ultrasound.

Authors:  Paul S Fishman; Victor Frenkel
Journal:  J Cent Nerv Syst Dis       Date:  2017-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.