Literature DB >> 21539832

Lineage mapping the pre-implantation mouse embryo by two-photon microscopy, new insights into the segregation of cell fates.

Katie McDole1, Yuan Xiong, Pablo A Iglesias, Yixian Zheng.   

Abstract

The first lineage segregation in the pre-implantation mouse embryo gives rise to cells of the inner cell mass and the trophectoderm. Segregation into these two lineages during the 8-cell to 32-cell stages is accompanied by a significant amount of cell displacement, and as such it has been difficult to accurately track cellular behavior using conventional imaging techniques. Consequently, how cellular behaviors correlate with cell fate choices is still not fully understood. To achieve the high spatial and temporal resolution necessary for tracking individual cell lineages, we utilized two-photon light-scanning microscopy (TPLSM) to visualize and follow every cell in the embryo using fluorescent markers. We found that cells undergoing asymmetric cell fate divisions originate from a unique population of cells that have been previously classified as either outer or inner cells. This imaging technique coupled with a tracking algorithm we developed allows us to show that these cells, which we refer to as intermediate cells, share features of inner cells but exhibit different dynamic behaviors and a tendency to expose their cell surface in the mouse embryo between the fourth and fifth cleavages. We provide an accurate description of the correlation between cell division order and cell fate, and demonstrate that cell cleavage angle is a more accurate indicator of cellular polarity than cell fate. Our studies demonstrate the utility of two-photon imaging in answering questions in the pre-implantation field that have previously been difficult or impossible to address. Our studies provide a framework for the future use of specific markers to track cell fate molecularly and with high accuracy.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21539832      PMCID: PMC3119919          DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  21 in total

1.  Long-term two-photon fluorescence imaging of mammalian embryos without compromising viability.

Authors:  J M Squirrell; D L Wokosin; J G White; B D Bavister
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Lineage allocation and cell polarity during mouse embryogenesis.

Authors:  Martin H Johnson; Josie M L McConnell
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 3.  Cell and molecular regulation of the mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  Yojiro Yamanaka; Amy Ralston; Robert O Stephenson; Janet Rossant
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation.

Authors:  Hitoshi Niwa; Yayoi Toyooka; Daisuke Shimosato; Dan Strumpf; Kadue Takahashi; Rika Yagi; Janet Rossant
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass.

Authors:  Noriyuki Nishioka; Ken-ichi Inoue; Kenjiro Adachi; Hiroshi Kiyonari; Mitsunori Ota; Amy Ralston; Norikazu Yabuta; Shino Hirahara; Robert O Stephenson; Narumi Ogonuki; Ryosuke Makita; Hiroki Kurihara; Elizabeth M Morin-Kensicki; Hiroshi Nojima; Janet Rossant; Kazuki Nakao; Hitoshi Niwa; Hiroshi Sasaki
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Blastomeres of the mouse embryo lose totipotency after the fifth cleavage division: expression of Cdx2 and Oct4 and developmental potential of inner and outer blastomeres of 16- and 32-cell embryos.

Authors:  Aneta Suwińska; Renata Czołowska; Wacław Ozdzeński; Andrzej K Tarkowski
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 7.  Establishment of trophectoderm and inner cell mass lineages in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Yusuke Marikawa; Vernadeth B Alarcón
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.609

8.  Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo.

Authors:  Jens-Erik Dietrich; Takashi Hiiragi
Journal:  Development       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Origin and formation of the first two distinct cell types of the inner cell mass in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Samantha A Morris; Roy T Y Teo; Huiliang Li; Paul Robson; David M Glover; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Inactivation of aPKClambda reveals a context dependent allocation of cell lineages in preimplantation mouse embryos.

Authors:  Nicolas Dard; Tran Le; Bernard Maro; Sophie Louvet-Vallée
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  31 in total

1.  Totipotency: what it is and what it is not.

Authors:  Maureen L Condic
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 2.  Building quantitative, three-dimensional atlases of gene expression and morphology at cellular resolution.

Authors:  David W Knowles; Mark D Biggin
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.814

Review 3.  Primitive endoderm differentiation: from specification to epithelium formation.

Authors:  Stéphanie Hermitte; Claire Chazaud
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Single cells get together: High-resolution approaches to study the dynamics of early mouse development.

Authors:  Néstor Saiz; Berenika Plusa; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 7.727

5.  Generation and live imaging of an endogenous Cdx2 reporter mouse line.

Authors:  Katie McDole; Yixian Zheng
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 6.  Advances in whole-embryo imaging: a quantitative transition is underway.

Authors:  Periklis Pantazis; Willy Supatto
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Coordination between patterning and morphogenesis ensures robustness during mouse development.

Authors:  Néstor Saiz; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Live imaging fluorescent proteins in early mouse embryos.

Authors:  Panagiotis Xenopoulos; Sonja Nowotschin; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 9.  Cytoskeletal control of early mammalian development.

Authors:  Hui Yi Grace Lim; Nicolas Plachta
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  Inverted light-sheet microscope for imaging mouse pre-implantation development.

Authors:  Petr Strnad; Stefan Gunther; Judith Reichmann; Uros Krzic; Balint Balazs; Gustavo de Medeiros; Nils Norlin; Takashi Hiiragi; Lars Hufnagel; Jan Ellenberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.