BACKGROUND: Fibrosis is associated with various cardiac pathologies and dysfunction. Current quantification methods are time-consuming and laborious. We describe a semi-automated quantification technique for myocardial fibrosis and validated this using traditional methods. METHODS: Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) was induced in adult Wistar rats by subcutaneous monocrotaline (MCT) injection(40 mg/kg). Cryosections of myocardial tissue (5 μm) of PH rats (n = 9) and controls (n = 9) were stained using Picrosirius red and scanned with a digital microscopic MIRAX slide scanner. From these sections 21 images were taken randomly of each heart. Using ImageJ software a macro for automated image analysis of the amount of fibrosis was developed. For comparison, fibrosis was quantified using traditional polarisation microscopy. Both methods were correlated and validated against stereology as the gold standard. Furthermore, the method was tested in paraffin-embedded human tissues. RESULTS: Automated analysis showed a significant increase of fibrosis in PH hearts vs. control. Automated analysis correlated with traditional polarisation and stereology analysis (r(2) = 0.92 and r(2) = 0.95 respectively). In human heart, lungs, kidney, and liver, a similar correlation with stereology (r(2) = 0.91) was observed. Time required for automated analysis was 22% and 33% of the time needed for stereology and polarisation analysis respectively. CONCLUSION: Automated quantification of fibrosis is feasible, objective, and time-efficient.
BACKGROUND:Fibrosis is associated with various cardiac pathologies and dysfunction. Current quantification methods are time-consuming and laborious. We describe a semi-automated quantification technique for myocardial fibrosis and validated this using traditional methods. METHODS:Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) was induced in adult Wistar rats by subcutaneous monocrotaline (MCT) injection(40 mg/kg). Cryosections of myocardial tissue (5 μm) of PH rats (n = 9) and controls (n = 9) were stained using Picrosirius red and scanned with a digital microscopic MIRAX slide scanner. From these sections 21 images were taken randomly of each heart. Using ImageJ software a macro for automated image analysis of the amount of fibrosis was developed. For comparison, fibrosis was quantified using traditional polarisation microscopy. Both methods were correlated and validated against stereology as the gold standard. Furthermore, the method was tested in paraffin-embedded human tissues. RESULTS: Automated analysis showed a significant increase of fibrosis in PH hearts vs. control. Automated analysis correlated with traditional polarisation and stereology analysis (r(2) = 0.92 and r(2) = 0.95 respectively). In human heart, lungs, kidney, and liver, a similar correlation with stereology (r(2) = 0.91) was observed. Time required for automated analysis was 22% and 33% of the time needed for stereology and polarisation analysis respectively. CONCLUSION: Automated quantification of fibrosis is feasible, objective, and time-efficient.
Authors: Attila Borbély; Jolanda van der Velden; Zoltán Papp; Jean G F Bronzwaer; Istvan Edes; Ger J M Stienen; Walter J Paulus Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vera M C Salemi; Angelina M B Bilate; Félix J A Ramires; Michael H Picard; Daniel M Gregio; Jorge Kalil; Edécio Cunha Neto; Charles Mady Journal: Eur J Echocardiogr Date: 2005-01
Authors: Maxim Hardziyenka; Maria E Campian; H A C M Rianne de Bruin-Bon; Martin C Michel; Hanno L Tan Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Ute Seeland; Simina Selejan; Stefan Engelhardt; Patrick Müller; Martin J Lohse; Michael Böhm Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2006-11-24 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Reza Avazmohammadi; Emilio A Mendiola; João S Soares; David S Li; Zhiqiang Chen; Samer Merchant; Edward W Hsu; Peter Vanderslice; Richard A F Dixon; Michael S Sacks Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: S R Roof; J Boslett; D Russell; C del Rio; J Alecusan; J L Zweier; M T Ziolo; R Hamlin; P J Mohler; J Curran Journal: Acta Physiol (Oxf) Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 6.311
Authors: Nawal M Al-Rasheed; Nouf M Al-Rasheed; Yieldez A Bassiouni; Iman H Hasan; Maha A Al-Amin; Hanaa N Al-Ajmi; Raeesa A Mohamad Journal: J Physiol Biochem Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 4.158
Authors: M C Della Vedova; F M Soler Garcia; M D Muñoz; M W Fornes; Sandra E Gomez Mejiba; N N Gómez; Dario C Ramirez Journal: Inflammation Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.092
Authors: N Schlabritz-Loutsevitch; K Apostolakis-Kyrus; R Krutilina; G Hubbard; M Kocak; Z Janjetovic; S Sathanandam; A T Slominski; G Mari; E Dick Journal: J Med Primatol Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 0.667