Cory M Tschabrunn1, Sébastien Roujol2, Reza Nezafat2, Beverly Faulkner-Jones3, Alfred E Buxton1, Mark E Josephson1, Elad Anter4. 1. Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine. 2. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine. 3. Surgical Pathology Division, Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine. Electronic address: eanter@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction usually occurs because of subendocardial reentrant circuits originating in scar tissue that borders surviving myocardial bundles. Several preclinical large animal models have been used to further study postinfarct reentrant VT, but with varied experimental methodologies and limited evaluation of the underlying substrate or induced arrhythmia mechanism. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and characterize a swine model of scar-related reentrant VT. METHODS: Thirty-five Yorkshire swine underwent 180-minute occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Thirty-one animals (89%) survived the 6-8-week survival period. These animals underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging followed by electrophysiology study, detailed electroanatomic mapping, and histopathological analysis. RESULTS: Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction measured using CMR imaging was 36% ± 6.6% with anteroseptal wall motion abnormality and late gadolinium enhancement across 12.5% ± 4.1% of the LV surface area. Low voltage measured using endocardial electroanatomic mapping encompassed 11.1% ± 3.5% of the LV surface area (bipolar voltage ≤1.5 mV) with anterior, anteroseptal, and anterolateral involvement. Reentrant circuits mapped were largely determined by functional rather than fix anatomical barriers, consistent with "pseudo-block" due to anisotropic conduction. Sustained monomorphic VT was induced in 28 of 31 swine (90%) (67 VTs; 2.4 ± 1.1; range 1-4) and characterized as reentry. VT circuits were subendocardial, with an arrhythmogenic substrate characterized by transmural anterior scar with varying degrees of fibrosis and myocardial fiber disarray on the septal and lateral borders. CONCLUSION: This is a well-characterized swine model of scar-related subendocardial reentrant VT. This model can serve as the basis for further investigation in the physiology and therapeutics of humanlike postinfarction reentrant VT.
BACKGROUND:Humanventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction usually occurs because of subendocardial reentrant circuits originating in scar tissue that borders surviving myocardial bundles. Several preclinical large animal models have been used to further study postinfarct reentrant VT, but with varied experimental methodologies and limited evaluation of the underlying substrate or induced arrhythmia mechanism. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and characterize a swine model of scar-related reentrant VT. METHODS: Thirty-five Yorkshire swine underwent 180-minute occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Thirty-one animals (89%) survived the 6-8-week survival period. These animals underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging followed by electrophysiology study, detailed electroanatomic mapping, and histopathological analysis. RESULTS: Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction measured using CMR imaging was 36% ± 6.6% with anteroseptal wall motion abnormality and late gadolinium enhancement across 12.5% ± 4.1% of the LV surface area. Low voltage measured using endocardial electroanatomic mapping encompassed 11.1% ± 3.5% of the LV surface area (bipolar voltage ≤1.5 mV) with anterior, anteroseptal, and anterolateral involvement. Reentrant circuits mapped were largely determined by functional rather than fix anatomical barriers, consistent with "pseudo-block" due to anisotropic conduction. Sustained monomorphic VT was induced in 28 of 31 swine (90%) (67 VTs; 2.4 ± 1.1; range 1-4) and characterized as reentry. VT circuits were subendocardial, with an arrhythmogenic substrate characterized by transmural anterior scar with varying degrees of fibrosis and myocardial fiber disarray on the septal and lateral borders. CONCLUSION: This is a well-characterized swine model of scar-related subendocardial reentrant VT. This model can serve as the basis for further investigation in the physiology and therapeutics of humanlike postinfarction reentrant VT.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M B Simson; W J Untereker; S R Spielman; L N Horowitz; N H Marcus; R A Falcone; A H Harken; M E Josephson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1983-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Farhad Pashakhanloo; Daniel A Herzka; Henry Halperin; Elliot R McVeigh; Natalia A Trayanova Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2018-06
Authors: Susumu Tao; Michael A Guttman; Sarah Fink; Hassan Elahi; Kaustubha D Patil; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Aravindan D Kolandaivelu; Ronald D Berger; Marc K Halushka; Ehud J Schmidt; Daniel A Herzka; Henry R Halperin Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2018-12-26
Authors: Kuo Zhang; Wenyao Wang; Shihua Zhao; Stuart D Katz; Giorgio Iervasi; A Martin Gerdes; Yi-Da Tang Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Samantha D Francis Stuart; Nicole M De Jesus; Merry L Lindsey; Crystal M Ripplinger Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 5.000